4 Amendments of Agnes SCHIERHUBER related to 2008/2100(INI)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the establishmenta clear demarcation between the scope of the EAFRD and othe separation ofr non- agricultural funding from the scope of cohesion policy and a broader regional development perspective may result insuch as funding under cohesion policy is needed to reduce the risk of some objectives (e.g. environmental protection and education) being either duplicated or omitted altogether,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas, in view of budgetary constraints, there is a risk that funding available under the ERDF will be used to a large extent to boost economic competitiveness in larger urban centres or the most dynamic regions, while EAFRD financing will be focused on improving agricultural competitiveness, and that spending on support forthe diversification of non-agricultural activities and the development of SMEs in rural areas will fall in between both funds and not be covered by either,
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that rural development policy has a huge influencplays an important role oin territorial cohesion and that due consideration should be given to whether it is justifiablrural areas by targeting and addressing specific concerns in these areas and hence tohe separateion between rural development measures fromand cohesion and regional development policy is justified;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that including rural development policy withinand cohesion and regional development policy is only possible on the condition that rural development receives adequate funding, that this funding is used in line withmust be kept separate, as doing otherwise could lead to inadequate funding of the priorities set out for rural areas, and that rural development measures do not draand to a massive drop in resources intended for direct payments to farmers,