BETA

12 Amendments of Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA related to 2009/2155(INI)

Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the objective should be to reduce the costs of the CAP, both direct and indirect, simplification of the CAP should be chiefly designed to reduce the administrative burdens on Community producers and in particular to encourage new investment and young people's access to the farming sector,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas a new CAP should bethe main objective of the successive reforms of the common agricultural policy has been to make production more market-oriented, and focused on reducing the excessive protectionism that hinders competitionr that purpose aid has been decoupled and most of the management mechanisms have been dismantled,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the CAP to be outcome-driven rather than focused on regulation, withProposes that Member States offering more help and advice to farmers, and believes that, to that end, a telephone helpline should be instituted in all Member States to assist farmers;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for the CAP to be simpler, more transparent and more equitable; in this respect a single flat rate payment would be preferable;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that the simplification of the CAP need not result in less support for farmers and the dismantling of traditional market management instruments; calls for the European Union to introduce efficient mechanisms to curb price volatility with a view to the future;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that the future single payment should be based on a simplified flat rate basic support system based on uniform payments in order to make the CAP simpler, fairer and more transparent;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 188 #
Marketing standards for fruit and vegetables 26c. Regrets the near-total dismantling of the Community marketing rules in the fruit and vegetables sector; 26d. Considers that the reduction of fruit and vegetable marketing standards has not led to concrete simplification for operators; 26e. Considers that the wide disparity in implementing the new framework by Member States raises concerns about the proper functioning of the internal market; 26f. Looks forward to the results of the impact assessment in order to assess the value of fruit and vegetable marketing standards; 26g. Calls on the Member States and the Commission, therefore, to launch a detailed debate in order to ensure a solid Community framework which can boost the transparency of commercial operations and establish a common language for operators and consumer friendly quality criteria;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that the identification of animals should continue to be done using the producerholding number instead of the holding number order to ensure good health control of livestock;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that only one holding number should be issued per producer;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the number of registers should be limited, with batch registration combined with holding number being sufficient, and that there is no benefit in adding an individual register for each holding;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that double reporting on the movement of sheep and goats to the central data base should be abolished (slaughter report + holding registers); the forwarding of information to databases and the authorities should be simplified as much as possible, avoiding unnecessary duplication and using all available communication tools, in particular new technologies;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the use of handwritten ear tags should be allowed for sheep in the same way as for bovines;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI