BETA

Activities of Mathieu GROSCH related to 2010/0253(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Single European railway area (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0253(COD)
Single European railway area (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/0253(COD)

Amendments (14)

Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) The national regulatory bodies should create a network to enhance cross- border cooperation and improve market condition. This network should within five years after entry into force of this directive lead to the creation of a European regulatory body.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) The national regulatory bodies should create a network to enhance cross- border cooperation and improve market condition. This network should within five years after entry into force of this directive lead to the creation of a European regulatory body.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
(21 a) 'essential facility’ means a facility where the following conditions are cumulatively met: - the service is indispensable to the operator of a railway undertaking, in particularly for new competitors, in order to operate in an efficient way; - the company operating the service facility has the capacity and is technically able to provide access according to economical and social related conditions; - the refusal of the facility is likely to eliminate all competition because it is physically or economically impossible to replicate it.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
(21 a) 'essential facility’ means a facility where the following conditions are cumulatively met: - the service is indispensable to the operator of a railway undertaking, in particularly for new competitors, in order to operate in an efficient way; - the company operating the service facility has the capacity and is technically able to provide access according to economical and social related conditions; - the refusal of the facility is likely to eliminate all competition because it is physically or economically impossible to replicate it.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Having due regard to Articles 93, 107 and 108 of the Treaty, Member States mayshall also provide the infrastructure manager with financing consistent with its tasks, the size of the infrastructure and financial requirements, in particular in order to cover new investments.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Having due regard to Articles 93, 107 and 108 of the Treaty, Member States mayshall also provide the infrastructure manager with financing consistent with its tasks, the size of the infrastructure and financial requirements, in particular in order to cover new investments.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The services referred to in Annex III, point 2, shall be supplied by all operators of service facilities in a non-discriminatory manner, since they are essential facilities according to Art. 3 (21a) (new).
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The services referred to in Annex III, point 2, shall be supplied by all operators of service facilities in a non-discriminatory manner, since they are essential facilities according to Art. 3 (21a) (new).
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Requests by railway undertakings for access to the service facility may only be rejected if there are viable and acceptable alternatives allowing them to operate the freight or passenger service concerned on the same route under economically acceptable conditions. The burden of proving for the existence of a viable alternative lies with the operator of the service facility.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Requests by railway undertakings for access to the service facility may only be rejected if there are viable and acceptable alternatives allowing them to operate the freight or passenger service concerned on the same route under economically acceptable conditions. The burden of proving for the existence of a viable alternative lies with the operator of the service facility.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The regulatory body has to be informed and have access to relevant documents concerning the requests and decisions according to Annex III point 1 and 2 in order to be able to ensure that these decisions are taken in a non- discriminatory way.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The regulatory body has to be informed and have access to relevant documents concerning the requests and decisions according to Annex III point 1 and 2 in order to be able to ensure that these decisions are taken in a non- discriminatory way.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Annex III may be amended in the light of experience in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 60.deleted
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. Annex III may be amended in the light of experience in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 60.deleted
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN