BETA

7 Amendments of Karolin BRAUNSBERGER-REINHOLD related to 2022/0398(COD)

Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) The effective application of Union restrictive measures calls for common criminal definitions of conduct infringing Union restrictive measures. Member States should ensure that this conduct constitutes a criminal offence when committed with intent as well as with seriougross negligence, in case the natural or legal person knew or should have known, that their conduct would infringe Union restrictive measures.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) Legal professionals, as defined by the Member States, should be subject to this Directive, including the obligation to report the violation of Union restrictive measures, when providing services in the context of professional activities, such as legal, financial and trade services. Experience shows that there is a clear risk of the services of those legal professionals being misused for the purpose of violating Union restrictive measures. There should, however, be exemptions from any obligation to report information which is obtained in strict connection with judicial, administrative or arbitral proceedings, whether before, during or after judicial proceedings, or in the course of ascertaining the legal position of a client. Therefore, legal advice in those circumstances should remain subject to the obligation of professional secrecy, except where the legal professional is taking part in the violation of Union restrictive measures, or the legal advice is provided for the purposes of violating Union restrictive measures, or the legal professional knows that the client is seeking legal advice for the purposes of violating Union restrictive measures. Knowledge can be inferred from objective factual circumstances.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
(3) The conduct referred to in paragraph 2, points (a) to (g) shall constitute a criminal offence also if committed with seriougross negligence.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5
(5) Nothing in paragraph 2 shall be understood as imposing an obligation on legal professionals to report information which is obtained in strict connection with judicial, administrative or arbitral proceedings, whether before, during or after judicial proceedings, or in the course of ascertaining the legal position of a client. Legal advice in those circumstances shall be protected by professional secrecy, except where the legal professional is taking part in the violation of Union restrictive measures, or the legal advice is provided for the purposes of violating Union restrictive measures, or the legal professional knows that the client is seeking legal advice for the purposes of violating Union restrictive measures.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
(3) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the criminal offences referred to in Article 3(2), points (h)(iii), (iv) and (v), are punishable by a maximum penalty of at least one year of imprisonment when they involve funds or economic resources of a value of at least EUR 1 000 000. Member States shall ensure that the threshold of EUR 1 000 000 or more may also be met through a series of linked offences referred to in Article 3(2), points (h)(iii), (iv) and (v), when committed by the same offender.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4
(4) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the criminal offences referred to in Article 3(2), points (a) to (g), (h)(i) and (ii), and point (i), are punishable by a maximum penalty of at least five years of imprisonment when they involve funds or economic resources of a value of at least EUR 1 000 000. Member States shall ensure that the threshold of EUR 1 000 000 or more may also be met through a series of linked offences referred to in Article 3(2), points (a) to (g), (h)(i) and (ii), and point (i), by the same offender.
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
(5) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that natural persons who have committed the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 may be subject to additional penalties. Those additional penalties shall include fines. The maximum fines shall amount to at least EUR 10 000 000 where those offences involve funds or economic resources of a value of at least EUR 1 000 000
2023/05/30
Committee: LIBE