Activities of Paul RÜBIG related to 2012/2218(DEC)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2011 PDF (164 KB) DOC (83 KB)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’s budget for the financial year 2011;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Grants the Executive Director of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking discharge in respect of the implementation of the Joint Undertaking’'s budget for the financial year 2011;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the relatively low implementation rate for operational payment appropriations standing at 86 %, 53 % and 18 % for the 2008, 2009 and 2010 call for proposals,; notes the delays at the level of the Member States in signing the national grant agreements; is concerned about the low implementation rate of the budget and, moreover, about the underlying activities of the Joint Undertaking; calls for a detailed progress report on these shortcomings which makes specific proposals for a gradual improvement in the implementation rate;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Takes noteCondemns the fact that Greece is using Union Structural Funds to cover its national contributions to the Greek beneficiaries of the Artemis projects instead of providing national funding and that the Joint Undertaking acknowledged the continuation of Greek participation in Artemis projects but provides no funding to the Greek beneficiaries as an expenditure co-financed by Union Structural Funds shall not receive assistance from another Union financial instrument in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7 a (new)
Subheading 7 a (new)
Possible merger with ENIAC Considers that cost benefit analysis of a merger with ENIAC should be undertaken and that the European Parliament should be notified about the results of this assessment. This report should highlight the possible advantages and disadvantages of such a merger.