4 Amendments of Fabienne KELLER related to 2020/2018(INL)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that digital services and their underlying algorithms need to fully respect fundamental rights, especially the protection of privacy and personal data, non-discrimination, the protection of intellectual property rights and the freedom of speech and information, as enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental rights of the European Union; calls therefore on the Commission to implement an obligation of transparency and explainability of algorithms, and the possibility of human intervention, as well as other measures, such as independent audits and specific stress tests to assist and enforce compliance;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the rapid development of digital services requires strong legislation to protect privacy and a reasonable duty of care to ensure digital dignitycitizens' digital security, which is essential in order to comply with the principle of the free movement of digital services; stresses therefore in this regard that all digital services need to fully respect Union data protection law, namely Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (GDPR)1 and Directive (EC) 2002/58 of the European Parliament and of the Council (ePrivacy)2, currently under revision, and the freedom of expression; _________________ 1Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). 2 Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers it essential to better protect citizens and consumers from the dissemination of illegal or harmful content, which impinges on the fundamental rights of individuals and democracy; deems it necessary to make online platforms more responsible by implementing a common framework to effectively detect and remove illegal content; considers, in particular, that a harmonised EU framework should be based on due diligence obligations so that platforms implement proactive and effective measures, in addition to the obligations regarding transparency and information; considers it important to conduct "notification and action" procedures to identify new content, via the obligation to monitor content that has already been deemed illegal and removed, in order to prevent it from reappearing online;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Deems it necessary, with regard to the increasing fragmentation of national laws concerning the fight against illegal or harmful content, to strengthen cooperation between the Member States, in particular with the support of the Commission and the EU agencies; underlines the importance of such a dialogue, in particular as regards the differing opinions among Member States on whether content is illegal or not and its potential impact;