BETA

8 Amendments of Hubert PIRKER related to 2010/0253(COD)

Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. In order to ensure the independence of decision-making in the performance of essential functions under this paragraph, Member States shall ensure that, from the date of transposition of this directive, the staff responsible for the performance of essential functions must be: (a) legally or contractually independent from any railway undertaking or from a company controlling one or more railway companies, (b) located in separate premises of any railway undertaking, or of a company controlling one or more railway companies, (c) legally or contractually subject to respect for confidentiality of information relating to their functions;
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. In order to ensure the independence of decision-making in the performance of essential functions under this paragraph, Member States shall ensure that, from the date of transposition of this directive, the staff responsible for the performance of essential functions must be: (a) legally or contractually independent from any railway undertaking or from a company controlling one or more railway companies, (b) located in separate premises of any railway undertaking, or of a company controlling one or more railway companies, (c) legally or contractually subject to respect for confidentiality of information relating to their functions;
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
RA requests by a railway undertakings for access to the service facility may only be rejected if there are viable alternatives allowing them to operate the freight or passenger service concerned on the same route under economically acceptable conditions. The burden of proving for the existence of a viable alternative lies with the operator of the servIf a request is rejected, the operator of the service facility shall be required to justify that decision to the requestor and the regulatory body. The regulatory body shall examine the reasons given and, if necessary, take corrective action. Article facilit56(5)(2) shall apply to decisions by the regulatory body.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
RA requests by a railway undertakings for access to the service facility may only be rejected if there are viable alternatives allowing them to operate the freight or passenger service concerned on the same route under economically acceptable conditions. The burden of proving for the existence of a viable alternative lies with the operator of the servIf a request is rejected, the operator of the service facility shall be required to justify that decision to the requestor and the regulatory body. The regulatory body shall examine the reasons given and, if necessary, take corrective action. Article facilit56(5)(2) shall apply to decisions by the regulatory body.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the service facility has not been in use for at least two consecutive years its owner shall publicise the operation of the facility as being for lease or rent. , concession or rent for railway related activities. In case of non-allocation due to lack of appropriate requests, after an assessment on the public interest of the service by the regulatory body referred to in Article 55, it is possible to proceed with the disposal and sale of the service.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the service facility has not been in use for at least two consecutive years its owner shall publicise the operation of the facility as being for lease or rent. , concession or rent for railway related activities. In case of non-allocation due to lack of appropriate requests, after an assessment on the public interest of the service by the regulatory body referred to in Article 55, it is possible to proceed with the disposal and sale of the service.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
When charging for the cost of noise effects is allowed by Unational legislation for road freight transport in a Member State, the infrastructure charges in the Member State concerned shall be modified so as to take account of the cost of noise effects caused by the operation of the train in accordance with Annex VIII, point 2.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
When charging for the cost of noise effects is allowed by Unational legislation for road freight transport in a Member State, the infrastructure charges in the Member State concerned shall be modified so as to take account of the cost of noise effects caused by the operation of the train in accordance with Annex VIII, point 2.
2011/05/31
Committee: TRAN