8 Amendments of Hubert PIRKER related to 2011/0196(COD)
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to ensure coherence between the different exemptions set out in Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, and to reduce the administrative burden on transport undertakings, to reduce bureaucracy and to ensure that recording equipment continues to develop in line with practice, whilst respecting the objectives of that Regulation, the maximum permissible distances set out in its Articles 13(d), (f) and (p) should be revised.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) Differing rules for calculating daily driving times lead to a lack of uniformity in the application of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 and create legal uncertainty for international drivers and transport undertakings. In the interest of a clear, effective, proportionate and uniform implementation of social security rules in road transport it is essential that the Member States’ authorities apply the rules in a uniform manner.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) 3821/85
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point j
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) 3821/85
Article 5 – paragraph 7
Article 5 – paragraph 7
7. The competent control authority, on the basis of the data exchanged, may decide to carry out a check on the vehicle and the recording equipment. Fines or periodic penalty payments may, however, only be imposed on the driver or transport undertaking after the competent control authorities have carried out a physical check.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
(3) A transport undertaking shall be liable for infringements against this Regulation committed by drivers of the undertaking. Without prejudice to the right of Member States to hold transport undertakings fully liable, Member States may consider any evidence thatmake this liability of the transport undertaking cannot reasonably be held responsible for the infringement committeddependent on an infringement of the requirements set out in Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 concerning Regulation (EEC) No. 3281/85.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1
Article 1 – point 1
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
(1) Drivers shall use the record sheets or driver cards every day on which they are driving, starting from the moment they take over the vehicle. The record sheet or driver card shall not be withdrawn before the end of the daily workinguntil the beginning of the rest period unless its withdrawal is otherwise authorised. No record sheet or driver card may be used to cover a period longer than that for which it is intended.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – points d, f, p
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – points d, f, p
- The distance of ‘50 km’ referred to in points (d), (f) and (p) of Article 13(1) is replaced by ‘1050 km’.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 561/2006
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point q (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point q (new)
- The following new point (q) is added to Article 13(1): ‘vehicles used in construction traffic for the supply and delivery of building materials’.