5 Amendments of Ian HUDGHTON related to 2017/2120(INI)
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, during the evaluation of the last CFP, the Commission found that whilst the CFP to date had ‘not worked well’ the coastal regime within the 12 nautical mile zone ‘has generally worked well’;
Amendment 59 #
Qa. whereas nonetheless, other than in relation to measures on markets and financial measures, freshwater biological resources lie outwith the scope of the CFP and accordingly any attempt to regulate freshwater biological resources at EU level would be ultra vires;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines the fact that, in keeping with the objectives of the CFP, any evaluation of the impact and significance of recreational fishing must include reference to the economic, social and employment benefits of recreational fishing activities;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recognises that recreational fishing has gone on for centuries across the EU and is an integral part of the culture, traditions and heritage of a great many coastal and island communities; notes that the different types of recreational fishing are as diverse as the cultures of the EU itself and that recognition must be given to this fact in any attempt to legislate in this area;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes that any such future regulation should fully respect the clear definition of responsibilities at the Union, regional, national and local levels, must fully respect the principles underpinning regionalisation, and must respect Member State competences within the 12 nautical mile zone;