7 Amendments of Panayiotis DEMETRIOU related to 2008/0804(CNS)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) It is important to ensure appropriate protection for all types of personal data and for all kinds of personal data filing systems, whether automated or manual, used by Eurojust1. In this respect, the Rules of Procedure on the processing and protection of personal data at Eurojust should apply to automated and structured files as well as to case-related manual files compiled by national members or assistants. _____________ 1 OJ C 68, 19.3.2005, p. 1.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Recital 8 b (new)
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) The rights of the defendant need to be taken into account in determining which Member State is best placed to prosecute or take other law enforcement action.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Recital 8 c (new)
Recital 8 c (new)
(8c) Adequate procedural safeguards, both during and after the investigations, , are a necessary condition for mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Recital 8 d (new)
Recital 8 d (new)
(8d) The Member States shall ensure judicial redress when the investigation was carried out at the request of Eurojust based on manifestly insufficient grounds.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2002/187/JHA
Article 5a – paragraph 3
Article 5a – paragraph 3
3. When in urgent cases a request for judicial cooperation needs to be executed in several Member States, the competent authority may forward it to the ECC through the representative of its Member State in the ECC. The representative of the Member State concerned in the ECC shall transmit the request to the competent authorities of the relevant Member States for execution. Where nois not possible to identify a competent national authority has been identified or it is not possible to identify it in a timely manner, the member of the ECC shall have the power to execute the request himself. In such a case, the ECC member concerned shall inform the College in writing without delay of the steps taken and the reasons for the failure to identify a competent national authority in a timely manner.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Article 1 – point 7 – point c
Article 1 – point 7 – point c
Decision 2002/187/JHA
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
(b) registers, other than those in (a), of his Member State containing information that is necessary for him to be able of his or her Member State, other than those in point (a), containing information that he or she deems necessary to fulfil his or her tasks.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision – amending act
Article 1 – point 8
Article 1 – point 8
Decision 2002/187/JHA
Article 9a – paragraph 3
Article 9a – paragraph 3
3. National members may, in urgent cases and where no competent national authority has been identified or it is not possible to identify ita competent national authority in a timely manner, be able to authorise and coordinate controlled deliveries. In such a case the national member concerned shall inform the College in writing without delay of the steps taken and the reasons for the failure to identify the competent national authority in a timely manner.