BETA

9 Amendments of Eva Maria POPTCHEVA related to 2022/2061(INI)

Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
J a. whereas crisis management remains fragmented across the EU and the BU, resulting in an unlevel playing field between banks and jurisdictions;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Encourages banks to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the European market for banking services; stresses the need to remove unnecessary obstacles to cross-border activities within the European Union;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that banks’ exposures to domestic sovereign debt remain high; recalls that one of the main objectives of the BU is to break the link between bank, in conjunction with unprecedented public financing needs since the Covid crisis; recalls that one of the main objectives of the BU is to break the bank-sovereign doom loop, through which bank failures translate to public debt and sovereign risks;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 239 #
16. Notes that crypto-assets create new challenges for banks; welcomes the forthcoming adoption of the regulation on markets in Crypto-assets in this regard; welcomes the recently published Basel prudential standard for banks' exposures to crypto assets, calls for the rapid implementation at EU level of this standard;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Points out the need to address the loopholes identified in the resolutioncrisis management framework; asks that the public interest assessment be further specified and harmonised, in a way that allows significantly broadening the scope of resolution, in order to foster better crisis preparedness of EU banks as well as less fragmented procedures to handle bank crises; calls for greater harmonisation of the treatment of small and medium-size banks, especially as regards external support by deposit guarantee schemes (DGS); stresses that the resolution framework and State aid rules should be consistent and allow for sufficient market discipline in order to protect taxpayers and erase implicit guarantees;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to put forward an ambitious and comprehensive review of the crisis management and deposit insurance framework; recalls that protecting taxpayer money is one of the main objectives of the resolutioncrisis management framework;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Takes note ofWelcomes the appointment of a new SRB Chair and of a new Board member; points out the lack of gender balance within the Board and across the SRB’s management positions; urges the SRB to address this issue and ensure a more balanced representation of genders in its management positions;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Encourages the SRB to move towards a further operationalisation of transfer strategies in resolution, building on existing best practices, for instance in the US or in Member States outside the BU;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Acknowledges the progress made regarding the reduction of risks in the banking sector; calls for a risk sharing mechanism through an EDIS, provided that an asset quality review be conducted beforehand and in parallel with further progress on integration both in terms of LSIs supervision and of capital and liquidity waivers, while continuing the risk reduction trend;
2023/02/20
Committee: ECON