Activities of Zita GURMAI related to 2011/2182(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
EU citizenship report 2010 (debate)
Amendments (12)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
– having regard to Part Two of the TFEU, entitled Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union, and Title III and Title V of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
– having regard to Articles 3, 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Lisbon Treaty enhanced the concept of EU citizenship and the rights derived therefromits derived rights and, inter alia, right of equality between men and women;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Invites Member States tothe Commission to examine the convenience for granting voting rights to EU citizens in regional elections when their regions are vested with legislative capacities;1 __________________ 1 When preparing the 3-yearly report on the EU Citizen rights, according to article 25 of TFEU.
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the issue of the deportation of Roma people by France in 2010 was controversial not only from the fundamental rights perspective, but also from the standpoint of the right to free movement and that of discrimination on the grounds of nationality, gender and racial and ethnic origin;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 17 – indent 1 (new)
Paragraph 17 – indent 1 (new)
– Calls on all stakeholders to use ICT resources to promote communication with the EU citizens
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to consider establishing European civic education to promote the role of the European Union among the young generation;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas several Member States have decided to introduce or to continue applying transitional arrangements which limit Romanian and Bulgarian nationals' access to their labour market; whereas such measures can lead to worker exploitation, illegal work and lack of access to social security benefits, which affect women more severely then men;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas a large number of petitions revealed problems in the field of accessing social security benefits, mainly involving a lack of cooperation on the part of national authorities, incorrect application of the principle of aggregation, gender equality, failure to provide correct information on the applicable rules or cumbersome administration of cases;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas the 21 July 2011 judgement of the ECJ[1] in addition to confirming the rights of EU citizens to move to another EU Member State and have the right to social security coverage, raises awareness on women's vulnerability in their access to social security rights;[1] See Lucy Stewart v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Case C 503/09.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to monitor the correct application by Member States of regulations on the coordination of social security systems, with a special focus on gender equality and the new aspects introduced by the Regulations 883/2004 and 987/2009, which came into force on 1 May 2010;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26 a. Considers that methodological and analytical support from the European Institute on Gender Equality (EIGE) is needed in order to examine the relevance of certain citizenship issues separately for women and men.