BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

15 Amendments of András GYÜRK related to 2013/0340(NLE)

Amendment 92 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 3 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. 'accident conditions' are deviations from normal operation that are less frequent and more severe than anticipated operational occurrences, and which include design basis accidents and design extension conditions;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 98 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 3 – paragraph 14
14. 'design basis accident' means an accident causing accident conditions againstfor which an installation facility is designed in according toance with established design criteria, and for which the damage to the fuel and theconservative methodology, and for which releases of radioactive material are kept within authorisedcceptable limits;
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 99 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
15. 'beyond design basis accident' means an accident which is possible, but was not fully considered in the design because it was judged to be too unlikely;deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 101 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 3 – paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. 'design extension conditions' are accident conditions that are not considered for design basis accidents, but that are considered in the design process of the facility in accordance with best estimate methodology, and for which releases of radioactive material are kept within acceptable limits. Design extension conditions could include severe accident conditions.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 3 – paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. 'verification' means an investigation process while we make sure that products of the phase of system, system component, method, calculation tool, computer program, development and production meet all requirements of the previous phase.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 113 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2009/71/Euratom,
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Persons with executive responsibility within the competent regulatory authority shall be appointed according to clearly defined procedures and requirements for appointment. They may be relieved from office during their term especially if they do not comply with the requirements of independence set out in this Article or have been guilty of misconduct under national law. An appropriate cooling-off period for posts with a potential conflict of interest shall be defined.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 128 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The obligation established in the first subparagraph includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority and the licence holders, within their fields of responsibility, develop, publish and implement a transparency strategy covering, inter alia, information on normal operating condi significant cases such as siting, construction, extension, commissioning, operations, of nuclear installations, non-mandatory consultation activities with the workers and the general publicperation beyond design service life, final shutdown and decommunicatission in case of abnormal events and accidentsg.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 168 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall at least every ten years arrange for periodic self-assessments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities and invite an international peer review of relevant segments of their national framework and competent regulatory authorities with the aim of continuously improving nuclear safety. Outcomes of any peer review shall be reported to the Member States and the Commission, when available.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 172 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8 e – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States, with the support of the competent regulatory authorities, shall periodically arrange, and at least every six years, a system of topical peer reviews and agree on a time-frame and the modalities for implementation. For this purpose Member States shall: shall ensure that arrangements are in place for periodic self-assessment of the safety performance of the nuclear installations under their jurisdiction and invite international peer reviews for those installations with the aim of continuously improving nuclear safety. Each installation shall be reviewed at least every ten years.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) jointly and in close coordination with the Commission select one or more specific topics related to the nuclear safety of nuclear installations. Should Member States fail to jointly select at least a topic within the time frame specified in this paragraph, the Commission shall select the topics to be the subject of the peer reviews;deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 182 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
(b) based on these topics, perform in close collaboration with licence holders, national assessments and publish the results;deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 186 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) jointly define a methodology, arrange and carry out a peer review of the results of the national assessments referred to in point (b), to which the Commission is invited to participate;deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 191 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) publish the results of the peer reviews referred to in point (c).deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 197 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 3
3. Each Member State subject to the peer reviews referred to in paragraph 2 shall report the outcomes when available to the Member States and the Commission and arrange for the planning and mode of implementation on its territory of relevant technical recommendations resulting from the peer-review process and shall inform the Commission thereof.
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 201 #
András GYÜRK
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2009/71/Euratom
Article 8e – paragraph 4
4. Should the Commission identify substantial deviations or delays in the implementation of the technical recommendations resulting from the peer review process, the Commission shall invite the competent regulatory authorities of Member States not concerned to organise and carry out a verification mission to get a full picture of the situation and inform the Member State concerned about possible measures to remedy any identified shortcomings.deleted
2014/02/19
Committee: ITRE
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation