BETA

4 Amendments of István SZENT-IVÁNYI related to 2008/2055(INI)

Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that a distinction should be made between the review of certain programmes within the current MFF based on: - the mid-term evaluation of legislation to take place in 2010-2011 -, the existing challenges resulting from the insufficient financing of heading 4 and heading 1a, and the new challenges such as energy and climate change and other policies linked to the new competences provided by the Treaty of Lisbon and the preparation of the new MFF;
2009/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that headings 1a and 4 are already under-financed in the current MFF; stresses that additional policies should not change the balance between the main categories of the current MFF nor jeopardise the existing priorities; stresses also and that, should the Member States continue to insist on a "1 % approach", there will be no budgetary alternative, in order to finance new priorities, but to also contribute from the two main policies of heading 1b and heading 2;
2009/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Considers that providing the Union with the means to fulfil its political ambition in the areas of foreign policy, energy security and fight against climate change should be part of a short-term review, independent of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon; is ready to examine the possibility of the creation of a specific fund for that purpose;
2009/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that heading 4 "The EU as a global partnlayer" remains chronically underfinanced; asks the Commission to make proposals for a long-term perspective financing for CFSP/ESDP in order to secure the means dedicated to this policy area and to avoid recurrent and endless negotiations with the Council during the annual budgetary procedures; is in favour of providing additional means for Defence Policy;
2009/02/16
Committee: BUDG