5 Amendments of Monika BEŇOVÁ related to 2017/0225(COD)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) It is recognised that, since the adoption of the 2013 EU Cybersecurity Strategy and the last revision of the Agency’s mandate, the overall policy context has changed significantly, also in relation to a more uncertain and less secure global environment. In this context and within the framework of the new Union cybersecurity policy, it is necessary to review the mandate of ENISA to define its role in the changed cybersecurity ecosystem and ensure it contributesundertakes a leading role which will effectively toimprove the Union’s response to cybersecurity challenges emanating from this radically transformed threat landscape, for which, as recognised by the evaluation of the Agency, the current mandate is not sufficient.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Within the framework of Decision 2004/97/EC, Euratom, adopted at the meeting of the European Council on 13 December 2003, the representatives of the Member States decided that ENISA would have its seat in a town in Greece to be determined by the Greek Government. The Agency’s host Member State should ensure the best possible conditions for the smooth and efficient operation of the Agency. It is imperative for the proper and efficient performance of its tasks, for staff recruitment and retention and to enhance the efficiency of networking activities that the Agency be based in an appropriate location, among other things providing appropriate transport connections and facilities for spouses and children accompanying members of staff of the Agency. The necessary arrangements should be laid down in that the agency concludes an agreement between the Agency and the host Member State after obtaining the approval of the Management Board of the Agency. This agreement should include provisions that ensure proper and efficient performance of its tasks, upon the due process and full discussion by the Man agreement betweenBoard of the Aagency and othe host Member State concluded after obtaining the approval of the Management Board of the Agencyr relevant stakeholder within the agency a request for auxiliary support, duties to be upheld by the host state may be ratified into the agreement.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Given the increasing cybersecurity challenges the Union is facing, the financial and human resources allocated to the Agency should be increased to reflect its enhanced role and tasks, and its critical position in the ecosystem of organisations defending the European digital ecosystem. Due regards should be given to further enhancement of capacity of the Agency.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The Agency should develop and maintain a high level of expertise and operate as a point of reference establishing trust and confidence in the single market by virtue of its independence, the quality of the advice it delivers and the information it disseminates, the transparency of its procedures and methods of operation, and its diligence in carrying out its tasks. The Agency should proactively contribute to national and Union efforts while carrying out its tasks in full cooperation with the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and the Member States. In addition, the Agency should build on input from and cooperation with the private sector as well as other relevant stakeholders. A set of tasks should establish how the Agency is to accomplish its objectives while allowing flexibility in its operationsclear agenda and a set of tasks an objectives which the Agency is to accomplish should be clearly defined while giving due consideration to the necessary flexibility of its operations. Where possible, highest degree of transparency and dissemination of information should be maintained.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The agency shall seek to identify critical vulnerabilities of the Unions cyber security network as a whole as well as those of individual Member States. In case the agency deems it necessary such vulnerabilities should be reported to the European Parliament.