BETA

95 Amendments of Ana MIRANDA related to 2011/0195(COD)

Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) At the World Summit on Sustainable Development at Johannesburg in 2002, the Union and its Member States committed to act against the continued decline of many fish stocks. Therefore, the Union should improve its Common Fisheries Policy to ensure that as a matter of priority exploitation levels of marine biological resources stocks are restored and maintained at levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yields from the populations of harvested stocks by 2015, wherever possible and tailored to each fishery. Where less scientific information is available, this may require applying proxies to maximum sustainable yield.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) An ecosystem and maritime spatial planning based approach to fisheries management needs to be implemented, environmental impacts ofthe impacts of non-sustainable fishing activities should be limited, pollution and the negative impact of urban development and tourism on the marine environment should be reduced and unwanted catches should be minimised and progressively eliminated.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) It is important that the management of the Common Fisheries Policy is guided by principles of good governance. Those principles include decision-making based on best available scientific advice, broad stakeholder involvement in shared management and shared responsibility and a long-term perspective. The successful management of the Common Fisheries Policy also depends on a clear definition of responsibilities at Union, national, regional and local levels and on the mutual compatibility and consistency of the measures taken with other Union policies.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The Common Fisheries Policy should recognize, value and protect the role of women in fishing, both in activities dependent on small-scale coastal fishing and shellfishing, such as making and repairing fishing nets, processing and marketing activities, and in other activities providing logistical support to the fisheries sector, ensuring compliance with the principle of equality between men and women.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Rules in place restricting access to resources within the 12 nautical mile zones of Member States have operated satisfactorily benefiting conservation by restricting fishing effort in the most sensitive part of Union waters. Those rules have also preserved traditional fishing activities on which the social and economic development of certain coastal communities is highly dependent. Those rules should therefore continue to apply, reserving the 12 nautical miles for small- scale fishing in areas where this is possible.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The objective of sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources is more effectively achieved through a multi-annual approach to fisheries management, establishing as a priority multi-annual plans reflecting the biological specificities of different fisheriespecies and the special characteristics of each fishery. In order to develop the management plans, it is essential first of all to compile an atlas of existing fisheries that identifies these and existing fishing areas; an inventory then needs to be drawn up of existing management systems and the last step is to define the specific management units in order to produce final management plans.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In view of the precarious economic state of the fishing industry and the dependence of certain coastal communities on fishing activities, it is necessary to ensure the relative stability of fishing activities by allocating fishing opportunities among Member States, based on a predictable share of stocks for each Member Statand the fact that the principle of relative stability has caused a significant discrepancy between the quotas allocated to the Member States and the actual needs and uses of their fleets, making it inappropriate for the allocation of fisheries at present, and thus provides no guarantee that fishing rights still belong to the corresponding coastal communities, it is necessary to abolish the principle of relative stability since it has lost its original meaning and should not prevail over the provisions of the Treaties, in order to avoid harming Member States that are discriminated against by the application of this principle.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Member States should be in a position to present substantiated requests to the Commission to draw up measures under the Common Fisheries Policy for measures identified by Member States as necessary to comply with obligations as regards Special Protection Areas pursuant to Article 4 of Council Directive 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, Special Areas of Conservation pursuant to Article 6 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora and marine protected areas pursuant to Article 13(4) of Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). The creation of a ‘Network of Marine Protected Areas’ will be proposed at European level for adoption on the basis of the intensity of fishing effort and the vulnerability of the species considered, as well as consistency with the different uses of the marine environment.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The Commission should be able to adopt temporary measures in the event of a serious threat, requiring immediate action, to the conservation of marine biological resources or to the marine ecosystem resulting from overfishing activities, the impact of certain urban projects on the marine environment, and pollution and climate effects. Should fishing activity be suspended or abandoned as a result of any of these temporary measures, social plans should be in place to compensate operators or encourage them to continue, as a priority measure, across the whole production process in the fishing sector.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) A system of transferable fishing concessions for the majority of managed stocks under the Common Fisheries Policy shouldmay be implemented no later than 31 December 2013on a voluntary basis for all vessels of 125 meteres’ length or over and all other vessels fishing with towed gears. Member States may exclude vessels up to 125 meteres’ length other than vessels using towed gear from transferable fishing concessions. Such a system should contribute to industry- induced fleet reductions and improved economic performance while at the same time creating legally secure and exclusive transferable fishing concession of a Member State’s annual fishing opportunities. Since marine biological resources are a common good, transferable fishing concessions should only establish user entitlements to a Member State’s part of annual fishing opportunities which may be recalled according to established rules.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Fishing concessions should be transferable and leasable in order to decentralise management of fishing opportunities towards the fishing industry and ensuring that fishers leaving the industry will not need to rely on public financial assistance under the Common Fisheries Policy.deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) SThe specific characteristics and socio- economic vulnerability of some small-scale fleets justify the limitation of the mandatory system of transferable fishing concessions to large vessels. The system of transferable fishing concessions should apply to stocks for which fishing opportunities are allocatedisheries and shellfishing justify their exclusion from the system of transferable fishing concessions and the need to lay down differentiated arrangements for small-scale fishing and shellfishing. To that end, the future financial instrument should earmark a specific percentage for small-scale fisheries, shellfishing, and extensive aquaculture, and a specific support programme should be established for small-scale fisheries, aimed at coastal communities which depend on fishing and giving priority, as regards access to the resources concerned, to those who fish and gather shellfish in the environmentally and socially most sustainable way.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Fisheries management based on the best available scientific advice requires harmonised, reliable and accurate data sets. Therefore Member sStates should collect data on fleets and their fishing activities, in particular biological data on catches, including discards, survey information on fish stocks and on the potential environmental impact of fishing activities on the marine ecosystemand make them available to end-users and the general public.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Data collection should include data which facilitate the economic assessment of undertakings active in the fisheries sector, in aquaculture and in the processing of fisheries and aquaculture products and of employment trends in these industries, and data on the impact on fishing communities.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
(36) Member States should manage and make available to end-users of scientific- data the collected data, on the basis of a multi-annual Union programme. Member States should also cooperate with each other on every tier of decision-taking and legislative power to coordinate data collection activities. Where relevant, Member States should also cooperate with third countries within the same sea basin regarding data collection.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Policy-oriented fisheries science should be reinforced by means of nationally-adopted fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programsmes adopted at State and sub-State level, taking into account the different tiers of legislative power, in coordination with other Member States as well as by Union research and innovation framework tools, thereby establishing a common research and innovation programme for the Union fisheries sector.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) Sustainable fisheries agreements concluded with third countries should ensure that Union fishing activities in third country waters are based on the best available scientific advice, ensuring a sustainable exploitation of the marine biological resources. Those agreements, which provide for access rights in exchange for a financial contribution from the Union, should contribute to the establishment of a high -quality governance framework to ensure in particular efficient monitoring, control and surveillance measures, as well as co-development, pursued jointly with third countries, and the economic viability of the European fleet.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) Aquaculture shouldProvided that the type of aquaculture promoted is sustainable or extensive, aquaculture can contribute to the preservation of the food production potential on a sustainable basis throughout the Union so as to guarantee long-term food security for European citizens and to contribute to the growing world aquatic food demand.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
(45) Aquaculture activities in the Union are influenced by different conditions across national borders, including as regards authorisations for the operators, Union strategic guidelines for national strategic plans should be developed to improve the competitiveness of thextensive aquaculture industry, supporting its development and innovation, and encouraging economic activity, diversification and improving the quality of life in coastal and rural areas, as well as mechanisms to exchange among Member States information and best practices through an open method of coordination of national measures concerning business security, and access to Union waters and space, and administrative simplification of licensing.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
(46) The specific nature of aquaculture requires an Advisory Council for stakeholder consultation on elements of Union policies which could affect extensive and intensive aquaculture.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) There is a need to strengthen the competitiveness of the Union fishery and aquaculture sector, and a call for simplification in support of better management of production and marketing activities of the sector; the Common Market Organisation for fishery and aquaculture products should ensure a level- playing field for all fishing and aquaculture products marketed in the Union, should enable consumers to make better informed choices based on traceability and support responsible consumption, and should improve the economic knowledge and understanding of the Union markets along the supply chain.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
(50) To ensure the involvement and shared responsibility of concerned operators in the Union system for control, inspection, and enforcement, Member States should be able to require the holders of a fishing licence of Union fishing vessels of 125 meters length over all or more flying their flag to contribute proportionally to the costs of that system.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53
(53) Dialogue with stakeholders has proven essential for the achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy. Taking into account the diverse conditions throughout Union waters and increased regionalisation of the Common Fisheries Policy, Advisory Councils should be strengthened by including the fisheries sector, the different governing authorities and the scientific sector, in order to enable the Common Fisheries Policy to benefit from the knowledge and experience of all stakeholders.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 59
(59) To achieve the basic objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, namely to provide long-term sustainable environmental, economic and social conditions for the fishing and aquaculture sectors, and to contribute to the availability of food supplies, it is necessary and appropriate to lay down rules on the conservation and exploitation of marine biological resources, as well as rules that ensure the economic and social sustainability of the European Union fishing and shell-fishing sector.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the social and economic viability of fishing activities, with adequate social protection and protection of human health, combating social exclusion and training workers and operators in the fishing and shell-fishing sector.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities provide long-term sustainable environmental, economic and social conditions and contribute to the creation and maintenance of employment in the fisheries sector and the availability of food supplies.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2
2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and shall aim to ensure, by 2015 where possible by species and fishery, and at all events by 2020, that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Common Fisheries Policy shall implement the ecosystem-based approach coupled with the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) to fisheries management, in order to ensure that the impacts of fishing activities onare consistent with the marine ecosystem are limited.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 4
4. The Common Fisheries Policy shall integrate the Union environmental legislation requirements, without prejudice to its economic and social objectives.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) reduce, with a medium-term objective of eliminateing, unwanted catches of commercial stocks and gradually ensure that all catches of such stocks are landed;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) eliminate unwanted catches of commercial and non-commercial stocks and gradually ensure that all catches of such stocks are landed;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) provide conditions for sustainable and efficient fishing and shellfishing activities within an economically viable, profitable and competitive fishing industry in which access to resources is based on fair and transparent criteria that ensure the full implementation of the Single Market;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) promote the development of sustainable Union aquaculture activities to contribute to food security and, including free-range cultivation areas and shell fishing on foot in general, so as to contribute to employment in coastal and rural areas and to food security;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) contribute to a fairdecent and appropriate standard of living for those who depend ondirectly and indirectly on fishing and shell fishing activities, especially in areas where there is no possibility of economic diversification away from fishing activities;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) take into account the interests of seafarers, be they self-employed or employees, and of consumers;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ensure systematic, regular and harmonised data collection and management of scientific, environmental, economic and social data.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) maintain a regional balance via the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP);
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
(fb) foster the promotion of decent work that complies scrupulously with European and international labour law, the improvement of living and working conditions, adequate social protection, social dialogue, the combating of social exclusion and the achievement of gender equality.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) broad involvco-management ofby stakeholders at all stages from conception to implementation of the measures;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) consistence with the integrated maritime policy, and the policy on economic, social and territorial cohesion and with other European Union policies.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 20
– 'aquaculture' means the rearing or cultivation of aquatic organisms using techniques designed to increase the production of the organisms in question beyond the natural capacity of the environment, where the organisms remain the property of a natural or legal person throughout the rearing and culture stage, up to and including harvesting, differentiating between 'extensive aquaculture' and 'industrial or intensive aquaculture';
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 23 a (new)
- 'small-scale fishing' means the activity of harvesting living aquatic organisms in their natural environment, or the intentional use of means that enable them to be harvested or caught, on the coast or in adjacent inland or maritime fishing grounds by fishing vessels less than 15 metres in length, which are operated by self-employed fishermen or by family businesses and use selective fishing gear and which do not remain at sea for more than 36 hours at a time;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 971 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 29
– 'aquaculture products' mean the aquatic organisms at any stage of their life cycle resulting from any aquaculture activity, differentiating between the products of extensive aquaculture and those of industrial or intensive aquaculture;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1074 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) establishing incentives, including those of an economic nature, to promote more selective or low impact fishing, including incentives to operators who already engage in sustainable fishing;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1152 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) other technical measures aimed at protecting marine biodiversity, in line with the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP).
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4
4. Multiannual plans shall be based on the precautionary and ecosystem-oriented approach to fisheries management and shall, in line with the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), and takeing into account the current limitations of the available data and assessment methods and all quantified sources of uncertainty in a scientifically valid manner, favouring a method scientifically validated by EU-recognised scientific bodies.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Multiannual plans shall provide for adaptations of the fishing mortality rate, resulting in a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains all stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield by 2015, where possible, for each species and fishery, and in all cases by 2020.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) a social and economic impact study;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 1
1. In special areas of conservation within the meaning of Article 6 of Directive 92/43/EEC, of Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC and of Article 13(4) of Directive 2008/56/EC, fishing activities shall be conducted by Member States in such a way so as to alleviate the impact from fishing activities in such special areas of conservation. The installation of industrial aquaculture projects that affect the conservation and protection of these protected areas shall be restricted in these protected zones.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1410 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 1
1. On the basis of evidence of a serious threat to the conservation of marine biological resources, or to the marine eco- system and requiring immediate action, the Commission, upon a reasoned request of a Member State or on its own initiative, may decide on temporary measures to alleviate the threat. These measures shall include economic compensation for the fishing industry affected by a temporary or permanent cessation of activity.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1444 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) contribute to maintaining or restoring fish stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yibiologically safe levelds through improvements in size-selection and where appropriate species selection;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1461 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) establish the minimum sizes referred to in Article 15(2).
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1466 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) require minimum conservation sizes for imports of fish and of aquaculture products from third countries;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1467 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new)
(dc) take account of the socio-economic repercussions of the adoption of such measures.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1598 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Fishing opportunities allocated to Member States shall ensure each Member State relative stability of fishing activities for each fish stock or fishery. In all circumstances, fishing opportunities must be proportional to the size and structure of the fishing fleet of each of the Member States at the time. The interests of each Member State shall be taken into account when new fishing opportunities are allocated.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1609 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2
2. BFishing opportunities must be balanced for multispecies fisheries and, where necessary, by-catch fishing opportunities may be reserved underadapted within the total fishing opportunities.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1643 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1
1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11 Member States may be authorised to adopt measures, in accordance with that multiannual plan, which specify the conservation measures applicable to vessels flying their flag in relation to stocks in Union waters for which they have been allocated fishing opportunities. The measures established in the multiannual plans must be approved without the objection of any of the Member States directly affected by the conservation measures.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1789 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 26 – title
Member State measures within the 12 nautical mile zone or, in cases where territorial waters do not extend to the 12- mile limit, within those waters
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1818 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each Member State shalls which establish a voluntary system of transferable fishing concessions no later than 31 December 2013 forshall exclude
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1827 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) all fishing vessels ofvessels less than 125 meters length over all or more; andres in length which fish on the coast or in adjacent inland or maritime fishing grounds, are operated by self-employed fishermen or by family businesses, use selective fishing gear and do not remain at sea for more than 36 hours at a time;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1837 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) all fishing vessels under 125 meters length overall fishing with towed gear.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1846 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may extend the system of transferable fishing concessions to fishing vessels of less than 125 meters length overall and deploying other types of gear than towed gear and shall inform the Commission thereof.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1852 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28
1. A transferable fishing concession shall establish an entitlement to use the individual fishing opportunities allocated in accordance with Article 29(1). 2. Each Member State shall allocate transferable fishing concessions on the basis of transparent criteria, for each stock or group of stocks for which fishing opportunities are allocated in accordance with Article 16, excluding fishing opportunities obtained under sustainable fisheries agreements. 3. For the allocation of transferable fishing concessions pertaining to mixed fisheries, Member States shall take account of the likely catch composition of vessels participating in such fisheries. 4. Transferable fishing concessions may only be allocated by a Member State to an owner of a fishing vessel flying the flag of that Member State, or to legal or natural persons for the purpose of being used on such a vessel. Transferable fishing concessions may be pooled together for collective management by legal or natural persons or recognized producer organisations. Member States may limit eligibility for receiving transferable fishing concessions on the basis of transparent and objective criteria. 5. Member States may limit the period of validity of transferable fishing concessions to a period of at least 15 years, for the purpose of reallocating such concessions. Where Member States have not limited the period of validity of the transferable fishing concessions, they may recall such concessions with a notice of at least 15 years. 6. Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions with a shorter notice in the event of an established serious infringement committed by the holder of the concessions. Such recalls shall be operated in a manner which gives full effect to the Common Fisheries Policy, the proportionality principle and, whenever necessary, with immediate effect. 7. Notwithstanding paragraph 5 and 6, Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions that have not been used on a fishing vessel for a period of three consecutive years.Article 28 deleted Allocation of transferable fishing concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1909 #
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1963 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 30 – paragraph 1
Member States shall establish and maintain a register of transferable fishing concessnsure that the register, and the details of the conditions aund individualer which fishing opportunities have been distributed, are available to the public.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1964 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 31
1. Transferable fishing concessions may be fully or partially transferred within a Member State among eligible holders of such concessions. 2. A Member State may authorise transfer of transferable fishing concessions to and from other Member States. 3. Member States may regulate the transfer of transferable fishing concessions by providing for conditions for their transfer on the basis of transparent and objective criteria.Article 31 deleted Transfer of transferable fishing concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 1995 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 32
Leasing of individual fishing 1. Individual fishing opportunities may be fully or partially leased within a Member State. 2. A Member State may authorise the leasing of individual fishing opportunities to and from other Member States.Article 32 deleted opportunities
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2010 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 33
Allocation of fishing opportunities not subject to a system of transferable fishing 1. Each Member State shall decide how fishing opportunities assigned to it in accordance with Article 16, and which are not subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions, may be allocated to vessels flying its flag. It shall inform the Commission of the allocation method.Article 33 deleted concessions
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2033 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shallmay put in place measures to adjust the fishing capacity of their fleets in order to achieve an effective balance between such fishing capacity and their fishing opportunities, with a view to achieving the objective of more sustainable and more profitable fishing.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2099 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall collect biological, technical, environmental and socio- economic data necessary for ecosystem based fisheries and aquaculture management, manage them and make them available to end users of scientific data and the general public, including bodies designated by the Commission. Those data shall in particular enable the assessment of:
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the level of fishing and the impact that fishing activitiesextensive fishing and aquaculture activities – particularly on an industrial scale – have on the marine biological resources and on the marine eco- systems, and
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2112 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the socio-economic performance of the fisheries, extensive and intensive aquaculture and processing sectors within and outside Union waters.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2155 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt national fisheries and aquaculture scientific data collection, research and innovation programmes. They shall coordinate their fisheries data collection, research and innovation activities with other Member States and Union research and innovation frameworks, which must espouse a policy supporting research and innovation in the EU fisheries and aquaculture sector.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. The positions of the UnUnion, in drawing up its positions in international organisations dealing with fisheries and RFMOs must consult with, on the basis of good governance principles, fisheries management authorities, the fisheries sector, consultation bodies and the scientific community; these positions shall be based on the best available scientific advice to ensure that fishery resources are maintained above or restored above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 3
3. The Union shall actively contribute to and support the development of scientific knowledge and advice in RFMOs and international organisations with a mandate to participate formally in the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI), the only global intergovernmental forum where major international fisheries and aquaculture problems and issues are examined and recommendations addressed to governments, regional fishery bodies, NGOs, fishworkers, the FAO and the international community, periodically on a worldwide basis.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) defend the interests of the EU fleets;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With a view to promoting sustainability and contributing to food security, growth and employment, non-binding Union strategic guidelines on common priorities and targets for the development of sustainable aquaculture activities shall be established by the Commission by 2013. Such strategic guidelines shall take account of the relative starting positions and different circumstances throughout the Union, shall form the basis for multiannual national strategic plans and shall aim at:
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) improving the competitiveness of the sustainable aquaculture industry and supporting its development and innovation;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) economic diversification within the fishing industry and improvement of the quality of life in coastal and rural areas;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2279 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a level-playing field for aquaculture operators in relation to access to waters and space.deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2313 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) administrative simplification, in particular regarding licenses;deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) certainty for aquaculture operators in relation to access to waters and space;deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) given the lack of indicators, draw up indicators for environmental, economic and social sustainability;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2333 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new)
(da) Ensure access to Union funding for the sustainable or extensive aquaculture sector which co-exists with fishing activities and does not exclude them, as these forms of aquaculture have less of an impact than industrial aquaculture and thereby contribute to environmental, economic and social sustainability;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2348 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 44 – paragraph 1
An Advisory Council on aquaculture shall be established in accordance with Article 53 and shall ensure that all forms of aquaculture existing in the Union are represented.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2368 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) contributeestablish preferential conditions for European products, given that the cost of imported products barely reflects carbon dioxide emissions, carbon footprint and other costs, and under equal market conditions, would place EU products at a disadvantage. A prior obligation to ensure equal or equivalent production and market access conditions should be established, before establishing equal market conditions contributing to ensuring a level playing field for all products marketed in the Union by promoting sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2380 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) organisation of the industry including market stabilization measures and import control;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2384 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) standards relating to the traceability of fishery and aquaculture products, by creating a specific label for fishery products from small-scale fishing and shellfish gathering or extensive aquaculture, in order to promote equal market conditions for these products.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the development of a culture of co- responsibility and compliance among operators;
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2465 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 52 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning amendments to that AnnexDecisions to change the areas of competence, to create new areas of competence for Advisory Councils or to create new Advisory Councils must be adopted via legislative codecision.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2477 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) submit recommendations and suggestionproposals on matters relating to fisheries management and aquaculture, as well as aspects of fisheries conservation and socio-economic issues to the Commission or to the Member State concerned;.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2489 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) cooperate in the joint management of fisheries resources.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2511 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. Advisory Councils shall be composed of organizsations representing the fisheries operators, the fisheries authorities of the Member States – depending on their legislative powers – the scientific community, representatives of maritime workers and other interest groups affected by the Common Fisheries Policy.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2524 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning the composition and the functioning of Advisory Councils shall be decided by codecision.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH
Amendment 2533 #
Proposal for a regulation
Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 12(3), 15(4), 20(1) and (2), 24(1) and (2), 35(3), 36(4), 37(7), 47(2), 52(2), 54(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2012/06/25
Committee: PECH