[ParlTrack]

. ‒ The EU defines the key proposals on the labour market strategy for the Member States in the Employment Guidelines (EGs). The EGs are decided by the Council only, and therefore need to be reviewed each year. This year, the revised guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States have been amended to align the text with the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, with the overall aim to improve Europe’s competitiveness and make it a better place to invest, create jobs and foster social cohesion. Essentially the revised EG’s are the following: Guideline 5 - Boosting the demand for labour, Guideline 6 – Enhancing labour supply, the access to employment, skills and competences, Guideline 7 – Enhancing the functioning of labour markets and the effectiveness of social dialogue and, Guideline 8 – Promoting equal opportunities for all, fostering social inclusion and combatting poverty. I voted in favour of this report, as it is important that the EG is moderated to reflect the goals of the European Pillar of Social Rights.

2016/11/22

I voted against this report, as this legislation will have a massively negative impact on Irish road hauliers. Although I am not a member of the TRAN Committee, I have followed this file closely for the last 18 months. The Irish Road Haulage Association has always been advocating a reasonable Mobility Package. However, too many contradicting amendments went through the TRAN Committee filtering process (prior to the vote in Plenary) by a relatively small majority. Some of them encompass huge threats to the internal market. The Irish road haulage sector cannot afford these. I also voted to have these files taken off the agenda because it is possible that the next Parliament will take a more understanding position on posting, cabotage or driving and rest time. Unfortunately, the files remained on the agenda. With the ongoing issues surrounding Brexit, it is still possible that we will end up with a hard Brexit by accident; we now might end up with unaffordable social rules for Irish hauliers because these files passed through this Parliament.

2016/11/22

I voted against this report, as this legislation will have a massively negative impact on Irish road hauliers. Although I am not a member of the TRAN Committee, I have followed this file closely for the last 18 months. The Irish Road Haulage Association has always been advocating a reasonable Mobility Package. However, too many contradicting amendments went through the TRAN Committee filtering process (prior to the vote in Plenary) by a relatively small majority. Some of them encompass huge threats to the internal market. The Irish road haulage sector cannot afford these. I also voted to have these files taken off the agenda because it is possible that the next Parliament will have a more understanding position on posting, cabotage or driving and rest time. Unfortunately, the files remained on the agenda. With the ongoing issues surrounding Brexit, it is still possible that we will end up with a hard Brexit by accident; we now might end up with unaffordable social rules for Irish hauliers because these files passed through this Parliament.

2016/11/22

I voted against this report, as this legislation will have a massively negative impact on Irish road hauliers. Although I am not a member of the TRAN Committee, I have followed this file closely for the last 18 months. The Irish Road Haulage Association has always been advocating a reasonable Mobility Package. However, too many contradicting amendments went through the TRAN Committee filtering process (prior to the vote in Plenary) by a relatively small majority. Some of them encompass huge threats to the internal market. The Irish road haulage sector cannot afford these. I also voted to have these files taken off the agenda because it is possible that the next Parliament will have a more understanding position on posting, cabotage or driving and rest time. Unfortunately, the files remained on the agenda. With the ongoing issues surrounding Brexit, it is still possible that we will end up with a hard Brexit by accident; we now might end up with unaffordable social rules for Irish hauliers because these files passed through this Parliament.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The purpose of the Commission’s proposal is the establishment of the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) for the 2021-2027 period. The aim is to target funding from the Union budget to support the common fisheries policy (CFP), the Union’s maritime policy and its international commitments in the field of ocean governance. Such funding is a key enabler for sustainable fisheries and the conservation of marine biological resources, for food security through the supply of seafood products and for healthy, safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed seas and oceans.I voted in favour of a number of amendments that will strengthen the Commission’s proposal, including Amendment 269 allowing the EU to co-finance 85% of operations to the Irish islands under the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund. This amendment is important because, post Brexit, Ireland will be the most remote Member State in the EU, it will be hit hard and its rural areas, which already struggle, will be hit particularly hard. No other Member State will be so geographically and economically isolated. Furthermore, Irish islands are continually depopulating and suffer from a serious lack of investment. This amendment is a critical step in addressing those issues.

2016/11/22

This legislation aims to focus on targeting measures to address the under-representation of women in employment by improving the conditions of reconciling working and private duties, but also their unequal treatment and opportunities in the labour market. Furthermore, it encourages the strengthening of men’s roles as carers in the family, which will also benefit children. It is well documented that the use of work-life balance arrangements by fathers, has demonstrated that they have a positive impact in reducing the relative amount of unpaid family work undertaken by women and leaving them more time for paid employment. It thereby promotes non-discrimination and fostering gender equality.It seeks to introduce a number of new or higher minimum standards for parental, paternity and carers’ leave, which are geared at helping to address the anomalies that exist in achieving a work life balance for both parents and carers. Finally, that the availability of quality, accessible, and affordable childcare infrastructure has proven to be a crucial aspect to work-life balance policies in the Member States and facilitates the rapid return of women to work and their increased participation in the labour market.

2016/11/22

The objective of the proposal is to extend the Excise Movement and Control System to intra—EU movements of excise goods that are released for consumption, in order to simplify the procedure and allow for proper monitoring of such movements, and to provide a base for the governance of further automations of processes defined by Union excise legislation, where such automation is considered beneficial. In the absence of this proposal, the coordinated planning of the automation of the intra—EU movement of excise goods that are released for consumption will not be possible. I voted in favour.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this resolution on tax treatment of pension products, including the pan-European Personal Pension (PEPP). This resolution calls on the Council, with a view to enhance the uptake of the PEPP, to elaborate proposals regarding incentives for PEPP savers. The rapporteur makes a number of suggestions including analysing existing tax incentives for personal pension products and assessing their costs, effectiveness and redistributive effects, and, where applicable, addressing inefficiencies and regressive effects. Furthermore, it suggests granting the same tax relief to PEPP as that granted to national personal pension products, even in cases where PEPP features do not fully match all the national criteria. Finally, it suggests granting specific tax relief to PEPP, harmonised at Union level, to be laid down in a multilateral tax agreement between Member States. I also voted in favour of this resolution because added to these suggestions, the resolution stresses that tax is a Member State competence and that any decision to grant special tax relief to the PEPP therefore remains with each Member State.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Often isolated, and with generally poorer access to public services, the EU’s border regions face a unique set of challenges. This has been recognised under Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which provides that particular attention should be paid to cross-border regions when developing action to strengthen the EU’s economic, social and territorial cohesion. The aim is to create a mechanism for a common cross-border region in a given Member State to apply the legal provisions from the neighbouring Member State, if applying its own laws would present a legal obstacle to implementing a joint project.I voted in favour of this report, as it allows Member States to remove legal obstacles to the implementation of a joint project in cross-border regions. As this is a voluntary tool, which Member States may decide to activate themselves, it does not hinder Member States that wish to apply other mechanisms to cross-border challenges.

2016/11/22

Eurojust was created by a Council decision in 2002 to improve cooperation between Member States’ judicial authorities to help provide a pan-European response to fight organised crime. Decision 2002/187/JHA provides that Eurojust may conclude agreements with third countries and organisations. Such agreements may cover the exchange of information, including personal data, and the secondment of liaison officers or magistrates to Eurojust.To strengthen its capacity to work with Georgia, Eurojust has negotiated an agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and Georgia. Ireland, the United Kingdom and Denmark are participating in the adoption and implementation of the Decision. I voted in favour of this report as the cooperation will help the judicial authorities work together to fight cross-border organised crime. Together with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, it will improve the action taken to prosecute criminals who defraud the EU budget and EU taxpayers.

2016/11/22

Foreign direct investment contributes to the Union’s growth by enhancing its competitiveness, creating jobs and economies of scale, bringing in capital, technologies, innovation, expertise, and by opening new markets for the Union’s exports. It supports the objectives of the Investment Plan for Europe and contributes to other Union projects and programmes. The EU needs to and will remain open for foreign direct investment (FDI). A framework for screening FDI into the Union allows Member States to better coordinate and exchange information when necessary in relation to foreign investments that can affect national security or public order. It is important to underline that this framework is by no means a protectionist tool. Equally important to stress is that the final decision on whether to set up a screening mechanism or allow an investment rests with the Member State. On the other hand, to establish a framework and coordinate information in an expert group helps to raise awareness and keep an eye on our common EU project and programmes. I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ In July 2018, the Commission put forward a proposal that the existing rules of the European Fisheries Control Agency should go through codification and therefore circulated a draft codification regulation. Codification is the process in which one or more legislative acts and all their amendments are brought together in a new legally binding act. This would be without making any changes to the substance of the original acts and any of their amendments. The Consultative Working Group of Legal Services (including representatives from Parliament, the Council and the Commission), came to the conclusion in October 2018 that the Commission proposal encompassed an entirely straightforward process of codification with regard to the rules of the Fisheries Control Agency, with no change to the substance of the existing texts. Therefore, the Economic and Social Committee within Parliament accepted and endorsed the proposal in November 2018. The vote on this proposal was put to the entire Parliament then with no amendments tabled. I voted in favour of this proposal, as there were no issues of contention pointed out and the process was deemed to be uncomplicated.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal involves a Commission recasting of a previous Decision (No 1152/2003/EC) which founded the computerised system for the movement and surveillance of excise goods (Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS)). At present, this Decision only covers the movement of excise goods under excise duty suspension. The objective of this proposal is to extend the EMCS to cover intra—EU movements of excise goods which are released for consumption, particularly alcohol. The aim is to simplify the procedure and allow for the proper monitoring of these movements, as well as providing a base for the governance of further automation of processes defined by EU excise legislation. This proposal reaffirms that this computerised system is intended to permit the electronic transmission of any accompanying documents and improvement of checks, and improve how the internal market functions by simplifying the movement of excise goods between Member States. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it is necessary that the procedure for the movement of excise goods becomes simplified. As the Commission proposal simply updates the former legislation, it was not a contentious file within Parliament.

2016/11/22

. ‒ As part of the Capital Markets Union Plan, the Commission announced a number of targeted actions on the rules governing ownership of securities and third-party effects of the assignment of claims aimed at reducing legal uncertainties for cross-border transactions. The overall objective of the proposal is to remove barriers to cross-border investment and reduce the costs of funding through the adoption of uniform conflict-of-laws rules at the EU level. The assignment of claims is a source of liquidity for companies and is mainly used by the SME sector through factoring and collateralisation or by banks and larger companies through securitisation. In the transfer of claims, ensuring the acquisition of legal title is important for the purchaser or assignee to prevent a third party from claiming legal title over the same claim. This remains a complex and technical legal issue. I voted in favour of this text as I am supportive of the principle behind it, in that it will provide certainty for cross-border transactions.

2016/11/22

. ‒ In the context of the preparation of the next multiannual financial framework (MFF), the Commission proposes the establishment of the Pericles IV programme to prevent and combat counterfeiting and related fraud, thus enhancing the competitiveness of the Union’s economy and securing the sustainability of public finances. Throughout its existence, this proposal has appeared to be extremely uncontroversial, with only a few minor issues raised by Member States. These involve formatting issues with the documents and that the conditions for the co-financing rate be implemented for 90% instead of the standard 75%. Currently, the programme has been successful, including within Ireland, with its implementation considered a success throughout all Member States. Therefore, I voted in favour of this proposal as it does not represent any contentious changes to the as of now successful Pericles IV programme.

2016/11/22

I abstained on the final vote on the EU-Singapore Trade Deal. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However, I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection etc. These are very difficult decisions for me, as Ireland basically depends on trade and the EU also needs to be part of the trading system. Indeed many of the proposals in our trade deals are far from perfect, they are the most progressive globally. The EU can have a positive impact on world trade.

2016/11/22

I abstained on the final vote on the Singapore Trade Deal. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However, I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection etc. These are very difficult decisions for me, as Ireland basically depends on trade and the EU also needs to be part of the trading system. Indeed many of the proposals in our trade deals are far from perfect, they are the most progressive globally. The EU can have a positive impact on world trade.

2016/11/22

I voted against all the provisions on Investor Courts. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal, which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However, I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection, etc.

2016/11/22

I voted against all the provisions on Investor Courts. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal, which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However, I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection, etc.

2016/11/22

I abstained on the final vote on the Singapore Trade Deal. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection etc. These are very difficult decisions for me, as Ireland basically depends on trade and the EU also needs to be part of the trading system. Indeed many of the proposals in our trade deals are far from perfect, they are the most progressive globally. The EU can have a positive impact on world trade.

2016/11/22

I abstained on the final vote on the Singapore Trade Deal. There are positive aspects to the Singapore Trade Deal which for example will benefit our Agricultural Sector. However I could not in conscience support the deal because it contained the provisions on Investor Courts. I voted against the Canadian Trade Deal in its entirety because of Investor Courts. But once Ireland ratified that deal it now means we are in that system as it were and any companies in Canada or that set up in Canada can use that system. I support free and fair trade but I believe that Investor Courts are a relic of past times and no longer necessary and that the rights of investors should not have any special priority in comparison to workers’ rights environmental protection etc. These are very difficult decisions for me, as Ireland basically depends on trade and the EU also needs to be part of the trading system. Indeed many of the proposals in our trade deals are far from perfect, they are the most progressive globally. The EU can have a positive impact on world trade.

2016/11/22

On behalf of the European Union, the Commission negotiated the treaty which established the Transport Community between the EU Member States and Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia. This report concerned granting consent to the Commission to conclude this negotiated agreement, which strives to create a Transport Community in the areas of road, rail, inland waterway and maritime transport. In addition, it would contribute greatly to the development of the transport network between the European Union and the aforementioned South East European Parties. The Transport Community is another positive step in fostering the accession process in the Western Balkans. The initial extension of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) to these countries has already had a positive result in terms of regional cooperation, with the connectivity agenda becoming one of the highest priorities for the region. The establishment of this Transport Community will enable new investments in the transport infrastructure and actively facilitate people-to-people contact and reconciliation which will, in turn, contribute to the progressive integration of the transport markets of the Western Balkans into the EU transport market.

2016/11/22

This annual report details the progress of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in its application for EU membership. It details that Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs has particular concerns regarding the marked slowdown in the pace of EU reforms since 2017, with little progress achieved other than the adoption of national strategies concerning the environment, rural development and energy and specific amendments to the Law on Excise Duties. The report emphasised the importance that as the BiH authorities have committed to the EU accession process, they must illustrate a consistent level of the implementation of reforms. Ultimately, this vote reiterated the call for BiH to adopt a thorough countrywide strategy on the protection of human rights, with additional steps most definitely needed to reinforce the protection of minority rights. I voted in favour of this report, as it is imperative that the rights of all citizens be properly recognised, including those wishing not to identify with any of the three main ethic groups with BiH.

2016/11/22

The Commission issued a proposal surrounding potential reforms to the current justice programme, operational until 2020, in order to ensure the establishment of a stronger programme for the period 2021-2027, one which is dedicated to protecting and defending justice, rights and EU values in times of extremism, radicalism and societal divisions. This proposal lays down both the objectives of the programme and the budget for the set programming period. In addition, it outlines the forms of EU funding available and the rules for providing such funding. This programme also relates to the rights and values programme and will be part of the new justice, rights and values fund under the EU budget, which will strive to sustain the fundamental values of EU societies, namely that they are open, democratic, pluralist and inclusive. I voted in favour of this report, as a strong justice programme will facilitate citizens’ access to justice and promotes judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters. This programme, in coordination with the rights and values programme, will strengthen the capacity of the EU to protect judicial independence, impartiality of justice and the protection of European values.

2016/11/22

The debate on the future of Europe has been a regular feature of this parliamentary term, especially since the UK referendum to leave the EU in June 2016. Under the initiative, the European Parliament is hosting debates on the future of Europe as a democratic and open forum where heads of state or government can express their visions on the European project. The main trends that have appeared in these speeches include deepening and completing the economic, monetary and banking union, migration and the importance of solidarity amongst Member States, the European pillar of social rights and the creation of EU resources for the EU budget. This report therefore summarises and provides guidance and clarification on the various directions that European integration could take, both ahead and after the EU elections in May. The aim is to define the main challenges as identified during the debates and outline priorities that the new MEPs will have to address. I voted in favour of this report, as there is a definite need to promote civil participation in the European project and to foster a more pro-European message from Member States.

2016/11/22

The proposal aims to improve the smooth functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice, and of the internal market, by increasing the efficiency and speed of the cross-border taking of evidence. It will achieve this by adapting Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 in order to fully make use of the advantages of digitalisation and ensuring that more use is made of videoconferencing. The initiative increases legal certainty and thereby helps to avoid delays and undue costs for citizens, businesses and public administrations, and addresses shortcomings in the protection of parties’ procedural rights. The principal amendments proposed to this Regulation include the direct taking of evidence by videoconference, the taking of evidence by diplomatic officers or consular agents and the mutual recognition of digital evidence taken in a Member State. I voted in favour of this proposal as Ireland is already participating in the 2001 Regulation and the proposed amendments have the potential to be of assistance to Irish litigants who are involved in cross-border litigation which require evidence to be taken.

2016/11/22

The aim of the proposal is to streamline and modernise the arrangements for the service of documents between Member States, thus making them more effective and efficient. It proposes to do so by utilising, where possible, modern information and communications technology rather than existing paper-based systems. It also outlines that Member States have an obligation to assist in locating a person on whom a document is to be served. Under these recommendations the current provision concerning the rights of the addressee to refuse service of a document in certain circumstances will be strengthened and clarified in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice. In addition, it illustrates new provisions concerning electronic methods of service, whilst also ensuring that the existing provisions concerning the giving of a judgment in default of appearance are updated. I voted in favour of this report as maintaining and promoting coherence, efficiency and clarity of the legislative framework on the cross-border service of documents in civil and commercial proceedings is crucial for the proper functioning of the internal market. Legislation on judicial cooperation can have a real impact on the everyday lives of EU citizens, be it as private individuals or business operators.

2016/11/22

This proposal is part of the Contingency Action Plan presented by the Commission to prepare for the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU without an agreement. More specifically, the regulation proposes a set of temporary measures to avoid a total interruption of air traffic between the EU and the United Kingdom and to ensure basic connectivity, founded on the principles of reciprocity and fair competition. With this regulation, the air transport sector is prepared for the scenario of a no-deal Brexit. Should this ultimately be the case, the EU will allow flights between the UK and the EU to operate and connectivity to the UK will be maintained for the benefit of EU passengers and industry. We also set a clear timetable for our EU aviation sector to adjust to the new situation, without unnecessary losses and damages. Not least, we confirmed the urgent need for the Union as a whole to engage, as soon as possible, in negotiations with the UK to reach a mixed comprehensive air agreement. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it is essential that we, both as the EU and as Ireland, are making preparations in case the UK leaves without an agreement.

2016/11/22

This proposal is part of the Contingency Action Plan presented by the Commission to prepare for the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU without an agreement. It outlines the need to establish a mechanism to extend for nine months the validity of certain aviation safety certificates in order to allow the operators concerned and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) sufficient time to issue the necessary certificates, taking account of the United Kingdom’s status as a third country. I voted in favour of this important proposal, as it essential that we prevent the detrimental effects of the UK’s withdrawal from the Union for companies that build, maintain or operate aircraft and that they can continue their activities as much as possible. This is in the interest of the Union, but also of the UK. After all, for many of the components used in aircraft, there are a limited number of manufacturers worldwide, and the Union and the UK strongly depend on each other in this matter. In any case, a high and uniform level of aviation security in the Union must be maintained, even if the UK becomes a third country.

2016/11/22

This proposal is part of the Mobility Package III, which is designed to make European mobility safer, cleaner, more efficient and more accessible. The main objective of this proposal is to simplify permit-granting rules and other regulatory procedures with the aim of facilitating the completion of the Trans-European Transport Network. It also aims to bring greater clarity to the processes project promoters need to follow, particularly considering permit granting, public procurement and other procedures. This regulation has the potential to make a great contribution to the effective completion of Trans-European Transport Networks in the Union by reducing the risk of delays, increasing the level of certainty for project promoters and investors throughout the necessary procedure process, and encouraging further the participation of private investors. I voted in favour of this regulation as the effective completion of this network is vital for the functioning of the single market, the digitalisation of transport and the transition to low-carbon mobility.

2016/11/22

The first EU Directive on motor insurance was adopted in 1972 with the purpose of protecting victims of car accidents and facilitating free movement of vehicles between Member States. Action at EU level can best ensure the protection of ‘cross-border victims’ of motor vehicle accidents, the reduction of uninsured driving on European roads and a decrease of motor insurance premiums when moving to a different Member State.Every year, uninsured driving costs the EU EUR 870 million in claims and affects victims of accidents, insurers, guarantee funds and motor insurance policyholders. The new Directive establishes greater protection to motor vehicle victims through a rapid and adequate payment of compensation to victims, even where the motor insurer becomes insolvent, and through the establishment of a minimum amount of compensation all over the EU.I voted in favour of the Directive as it will help citizens move across borders and will facilitate switching to a new insurance provider without higher premiums based on nationality or place of residence.

2016/11/22

Under bilateral fisheries partnership agreements, the EU reaches agreements with non-EU countries in order for EU vessels to be authorised to fish in the third countries’ waters in exchange for a financial contribution. These agreements help to promote the goals of the common fisheries policy at international level by ensuring that the fishing activities of EU vessels outside EU waters remain rooted in the same standards and principles as those applicable in European waters. I voted in favour of this agreement, as, in addition to allowing for fishing opportunities for EU vessels in Côte d’Ivoire waters, it also outlines some important recommendations. These include the need to improve the quality and accuracy of scientific data on all catches, the pressing need to tighten up control and surveillance and the measures in place to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, the need to establish marine protected areas and a recommendation that organisations representing both men and women in the fishing industry should be enabled and reinforced, particularly those involved in artisanal fishing.

2016/11/22

I voted against the EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement. The European Court of Justice ruled on 27 February 2018 that the EU’s fisheries agreement with Morocco is valid, but only if it does not include the disputed Western Sahara territory. That followed a similar ruling by the ECJ in December 2016 that an EU trade agreement with Morocco did not apply to Western Sahara. However, this agreement continues to include Western Sahara, and this in turn would mean that the agreement is still contrary to certain rules of general international law. Furthermore, MEPs were advised by Human Rights Watch first to take the matter to the European Court of Justice, as the UN does not recognise Moroccoʼs claim to the territory. I voted in favour of a resolution which called upon Parliament to seek the advice of the ECJ as to the legality of the partnership agreement, but it was rejected.

2016/11/22

Commercial fishing has not been known to occur in the Central Arctic Ocean and is not expected to occur in the near future. However, given the impact of climate change on the climate conditions of the Arctic Ocean, the need to develop a legal framework has risen sharply in recent years. In March 2016, the European Council adopted negotiating directives that would authorise the Commission to open negotiations for an international agreement to prevent any unregulated fishing in the high seas located in the Central Arctic Ocean. The end agreement does not absolutely ban commercial fishing, but instead seeks to establish rules for future exploratory fishing. Despite this fact, this agreement is a progressive step towards ensuring the collection of scientific data before the authorisation of any commercial activity. I voted in favour of this agreement, as changes to the Arctic Ocean due to climate change are currently inevitable and therefore international action is required to provide safeguard measures against commercial fisheries. This agreement represents an opportunity for the European Union to promote better ocean governance worldwide.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This regulation seeks to formally establish an EU anti-fraud programme, therefore outlining the objectives of said programme, as well as the budget that will be allocated to this for the period of 2021-2027. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) will implement the programme, ensuring that its fundamental objectives focus on the protection of the financial interests of the Union and support mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States. In addition, Member States and the Commission will cooperate with one another to ensure that the law is applied correctly concerning customs and agricultural matters. The more specific objectives of this programme involve supporting the reporting of irregularities including fraud, providing tools for information exchange and assisting Member States and the EU in preventing and combatting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities which would affect the financial interests of the EU. I voted in favour of this regulation as fraud that affects these interests is a cross-border phenomenon affecting all EU Member States and it is incredibly important that we adopt a common approach which outlines specific targeted actions, whilst also increasing European cooperation in this area.

2016/11/22

. ‒ In 2012, the Commission identified the reuse of urban wastewater as an alternative water supply measure, which would have both a low environmental impact and be able to address the water scarcity affecting 11% of the EU population. In 2015, following the successful European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Right2Water’, the Parliament urged the Commission to propose legislative framework on water reuse. In the last few decades, EU water resources have been affected by numerous droughts brought on by climate change and increased water scarcity has negatively affected millions of EU citizens, farmers and businesses. Treated wastewater from urban wastewater treatment plants can provide a reliable alternative water supply. Agricultural irrigation is recognised for having the highest potential for an increased uptake of water reuse, with this report recommending that the preferred option for agricultural irrigation would be a legal instrument with a ‘fit for purpose’ approach than can provide a higher volume of treated wastewater at a lower cost than other options. I voted in favour of this report as it proposes to install streamlined rules across the EU allowing for easier and safer use of wastewater for agricultural irrigation, as well as alleviating pressures put on local freshwater water bodies.

2016/11/22

The internal market has to adapt continuously to a rapidly changing environment affected by the digital revolution and globalisation. In order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market in the future, the new proposed programme under the next Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 intends to bring together activities previously financed under five key areas. These include business competitiveness, consumer protection, customers in financial services, policy-making in financial services and the food chain. Combined, these activities aim to regulate, implement and enforce the activities and actors within the internal market. This programme will strengthen support for small enterprises in order to facilitate their access to markets. In addition, it aims to improve the business environment, the competitiveness of certain sectors, the modernisation of industry and the promotion of entrepreneurship. I voted in favour of this programme as it will strengthen the functioning of the internal market through a more efficient and improved application of the mutual recognition principle and public procurement rules. There are also recommendations to ensure that stakeholders will comply with European standards and that consumers will be afforded a high level of protection.

2016/11/22

The existing rules governing intra-community trade are over 25 years old, meaning that this current system is not able to adapt to the modern challenges the economies of the Member States face. These present such problems as vulnerability to fraud, high business compliance costs and a relatively heavy administrative burden for national authorities, as VAT is such an important source of revenue for Member States. This proposal is the second legislative sub-step in establishing a definitive VAT system package, detailing the technical provisions for the actual implementation of this system for the intra-Union trade of goods. Ultimately, it will amend 200 articles of the current VAT Directive. The main objectives of this proposal include widening the scope of the current system yet keeping it simple to use, reducing the VAT gap caused by fraud by around EUR 40 billion, taxing the sales of goods and services between EU Member States in the same way as domestic sales, and reducing business compliance costs. I voted in favour of this proposal for the above reasons, especially since business compliance costs have become much higher for cross-border transactions than for domestic sales.

2016/11/22

Under the Treaty of the European Union, every person who holds the nationality of a Member State is a citizen of the EU and is therefore entitled to EU citizenship in addition to their national citizenship. All European citizens are afforded a combination of rights and duties that are given to them through their citizenship of a Member State, namely political rights, freedom of movement and consular protection. However, the European Union has not utilised all at their disposal to ensure that EU citizens are fully aware of their rights. This report seeks to rectify that by outlining certain recommendations that the EU institutions could act on in order to improve the implementation, scope and effectiveness of European citizens. For example, the report emphasises the need to allocate more resources to the creation of programmes and/or initiatives dedicated to fostering a European public space to inform EU citizens of their rights and obligations. I voted in favour of this report as it is essential that EU citizenship is further developed citizens, to ensure that EU citizens are put back in the centre of the European Union where they should be.

2016/11/22

Enhanced cooperation has been a feature of the European Union since the beginning, yet it became more streamlined since the Treaty of Lisbon came into force, essentially allowing a group of a minimum of nine Member States to pursue greater cooperation in areas that the Union does not exercise exclusive competences. An example of such an area of cooperation would include PESCO. These projects of enhanced cooperation come about if the Council is unable to reach a unanimous decision in a particular area, and so some Member States feel the need to establish these particular measures and move forward on a legislative proposal ‘as a last resort’. This report details the difficulties of such situations as well as recommendations that could ensure more effective, enhanced cooperation in the future. One endorses that the Commission be involved in every stage of procedures establishing enhanced cooperation, given regular reports and expecting a follow-up from the relevant committee in the Parliament. Although there are beneficial recommendations in this report, there are also concerns surrounding the inclusion of regional entities to projects involving enhanced cooperation, as enhanced cooperation should always be between Member States. Therefore, I abstained in the vote on this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ For the 2014 elections, the Spitzenkadidaten process was adopted. This is a procedure whereby the European Parliament political parties, in preparation for the European elections, appoint lead candidates for the post of Commission President, with the presidency then going to the candidate who gains the most parliamentary support. However, it has led to a ‘politicisation’ of the new Commission.This report aims to assess Parliament’s methods of scrutinising the Commission since the adoption of the new process. Although Parliament has a right to oversee the executive, there is no complete definition for it, as the power of the executive is organised differently according to the policy area. This report highlights the instruments that Parliament can use for scrutiny and for calling the Commission to account. They include: a motion for censure, the right of inquiry, parliamentary scrutiny of delegated and implementing acts, parliamentary questions and legal proceedings. I voted in favour of the report as it identifies instruments that Parliament can use to hold the Commission to account, as well as instruments it can use in respect of possible oversights.

2016/11/22

. ‒ With the adoption of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as part of the European integration process, the EU morphed from an economic community into a Union based on the rule of law and human rights. Although EU institutions have made great strides by integrating the Charter into their legislative and decision-making processes, it remains ultimately undervalued, and tendency has developed of avoiding its violation rather than aiming to maximise its potential. This report outlines the areas where fundamental rights could be promoted more extensively.For example, in economic governance, the Charter is almost completely neglected. It could be given more attention in the field of Common Foreign and Security Policy, as well as in international trade agreements, perhaps by introducing specific human rights impact assessments before the conclusion of any trade negotiations. In addition, the report points out that the content of the Charter with regard to EU policies should be streamlined, especially considering relations with other EU institutions.I voted in favour of the report, as, in order to promote full implementation of the Charter at national level, it needs to be more consistently and straightforwardly applied at European level.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The role of the European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, and the first statute for the position was adopted in 1994. However, the last statue has not been adapted to the new legal framework of the Treaty of Lisbon. Therefore, this report outlines the regulations and general conditions of the duties of the Ombudsman. Only minor improvements to the role have been described, with the main aim of preserving the independence of the Ombudsman continually emphasised.One aspect the report focuses on is ensuring that the Ombudsman has access to all relevant documents for the performance of his/her duties, including classified information. In addition, it is imperative that the regulations in place encourage enhanced cooperation between the Ombudsman and both the equivalent national authorities in Member States and the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights. There is also a call for the Ombudsman to submit an annual report illustrating the outcome of inquiries.I voted in favour of this resolution as these small modifications aim to enhance the Ombudsman’s exercise of soft power and to reinforce his/her independence and ability to remain impartial.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are essential for future innovation, leading to new business models, and they already play a key role in transforming societies and digitising economies. AI and developments in automation will increase productivity and, therefore, increase output. This report focuses on the importance of promoting and maintaining public support for AI, especially within the sectors where EU industry has a great opportunity to become a major player at a global level.Potentially, increased innovation in AI and robotics could benefit areas important to the public interest, such as the public sector, health, energy, transport, agriculture and the food chain, cybersecurity and small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs). This report also details some concerns that remain regarding the future of AI, specifically whether it will be misused at the expense of fundamental rights. Therefore, it advocates that AI research must focus on the detection of any corrupted AI and robotics, with all AI decision-making systems being completely accountable and transparent.I voted in favour of the report as there is most definitely a need to facilitate the future development of AI and robotic technology and to ensure that all regions of the EU have access to these technologies.

2016/11/22

This Directive aims to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides in the EU by reducing both the risks and potential use on human health and the environment. It highlights the principles of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and of potential alternative techniques. This report details the key provisions of the directive and what actions Member States should be taking in order to uphold these provisions. The first is that Member States are obligated to outline quantitative targets, measures and timetables for the reduction of use and risk of pesticides in their national action plans. Secondly, the aerial spraying of pesticides is to be prohibited unless there is concretely no viable alternative. Thirdly, this report emphasises that training of providers and professional and non-professional users is incredibly important, not only on the proper way to apply pesticides but also in how to regularly inspect their equipment for doing so. Lastly, in areas of concern, such as Natura 2000 sites, pesticides may only be applied within strict risk management measures. I voted in favour of this report, as ensuring the sustainable use of pesticides and stressing the importance that Member States adhere to their obligations under this directive is incredibly important.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report analyses the shortcomings in the implementation of the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive, outlining recommendations for improvement. This Directive establishes a framework that allows EU citizens to access healthcare abroad, simultaneously facilitating closer cooperation in areas of medicine. Therefore, this Directive exists parallel to access to unplanned medical care offered by the Regulation on the coordination of social security systems under the European Health Insurance Card.The 2018 Commission report on the functioning of the Directive illustrates that patient mobility remains low, for three reasons: late implementation, administrative hurdles and that existing patients are unaware of their rights. This report outlines several recommendations on how to better facilitate cross-border access to healthcare and the overall operation of the Directive. The lack of information should be approached by providing user-friendly information for patients and professionals in the health sector through properly equipped National Contact Points. Additionally, administrative hurdles can be reduced by simplifying reimbursement procedures. I voted in favour of this report as it is essential that this Directive and ones similar to it, such as the coordination of social security systems, are not only simpler to use but that EU citizens have a greater awareness of their existence.

2016/11/22

The votes on this report are focused on four areas of the current Rules of Procedure within the European Parliament, namely; the Standards of Conduct, Transparency, Parliamentary Questions and European Political Parties and Foundations. The most contentious issue of this vote was increasing the transparency of meetings between Members of Parliament and lobbyists, particularly Amendment 20, which detailed that Members should be required to meet exclusively with lobbyist groups and their representatives who have registered on the Transparency Register. Any scheduled meetings should then be published online. I voted in favour of these amendments to increase transparency, as I believe it is important that the ability for big businesses to lobby Members for their own gain should be significantly reduced. Additionally, this legislation will provide mandatory guidelines for rapporteurs, shadows and chairs with regards to publishing meetings, as well as increased levels of transparency on the General Expenditure Allowance. It is incredibly important for all EU institutions to be continually committed to transparency and accountability across the EU.

2016/11/22

In the beginning of October 2018, the European Parliament accepted that the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano be included in the EU customs territory and in the territory of the Union to which the excise duty directive (Directive 2008-118-EC) applies. These territories were also voted to be excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive (Directive 2006/112/EC), to ensure that the economies of these territories are given an even playing field. This vote makes some technical amendments to the Union Customs Code (UCC) to ensure that the Code meets the objectives of improving the competitiveness of European businesses, specifically in this instance, to include these two territories within its scope and ensure that they are protected under the aforementioned Directives. The inclusion of these two territories in the customs territory of the Union will come into effect on the 1st of January 2020.

2016/11/22

With the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) set to run from 2021-2027, there have been some concerns regarding payments made to the current pillar during calendar year 2020, as some of the expenditure related to 2020 will be made in 2021. This vote was to ensure that European farmers can be continually supported during the years 2019 and 2020 in the run-up to the implementation of the new MFF in 2021. I voted in favour of this amendment, which will allow for this period of transition to be taken into account under the provisions in this regulation. Currently, flexibility between pillars provides for an optional transfer of funds between direct payments and rural development. This report underlines that transferring between pillars should remain possible in 2020 under the current conditions, so as to not abruptly cease payments into specific areas of, or projects involving, rural development. Not only will this ensure policy continuity in the final years of the present programming period, but it will also allow for a smooth transition into the next.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This vote concerns authorising Austria, Cyprus, Croatia, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania and the United Kingdom to formally accept the accession of the Dominican Republic to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, in the interests of the European Union. This will ensure that these EU Member States can cooperate with the Dominican Republic, fostering cooperation amongst the competent and relevant authorities which deal with securing the return of children. In addition, these Member States will recognise that the Dominican Republic accepts the international binding laws of this Convention with regard to cases involving child abduction.As the subject of international child abduction falls within the external competence of the European Union and because of this, in order for these specific countries to accept this accession, this decision needs to be made by the European Council. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it will allow the President of the Parliament to forward this position to the Council as well as the governments and parliaments of the respective Member States.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report, which outlines that Austria is authorised to accept the accession of both Ecuador and Ukraine to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. This will ensure that Austria can cooperate with both Ecuador and Ukraine, fostering cooperation amongst the competent and relevant authorities which deal with securing the return of children. In addition, these Member States will recognise that the Ecuador and Ukraine accept the international binding laws of this Convention with regard to cases involving child abduction. Parliament approved this proposal, in order to ensure that EU-wide protection is afforded to the children in question.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This vote concerns authorising Austria and Romania to formally accept the accession of Honduras to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, in the interests of the European Union. This will ensure that both Austria and Romania can cooperate with Honduras, fostering cooperation amongst the competent and relevant authorities which deal with securing the return of children. In addition, these Member States will recognise that Honduras accepts the international binding laws of this Convention with regard to cases involving child abduction.As the subject of international child abduction falls within the external competence of the European Union and because of this, in order for these specific countries to accept this accession, this decision needs to be made by the European Council. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it will allow the President of Parliament to forward this position to the Council as well as to the governments and parliaments of the respective Member States.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This vote concerns authorising Austria, Luxembourg and Romania to formally accept the accession of Belarus and Uzbekistan to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, in the interests of the European Union. This will ensure that Austria, Luxembourg and Romania can cooperate with both Belarus and Uzbekistan, fostering cooperation amongst the competent and relevant authorities which deal with securing the return of children. In addition, these Member States will recognise that Belarus and Uzbekistan accept the international binding laws of this Convention with regard to cases involving child abduction.As the subject of international child abduction falls within the external competence of the European Union and because of this, in order for these specific countries to accept this accession, this decision needs to be made by the European Council. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it will allow the President of Parliament to forward this position to the Council as well as to the governments and parliaments of the respective Member States.

2016/11/22

This report concerns amendments to the budget and objectives of the association of the overseas countries and territories (OCT) with the European Union. The OCTs are located in the Atlantic, Antarctic, Arctic, Caribbean, Indian Ocean and Pacific regions, and their relationships with the EU have wide-reaching autonomy, covering areas such as economic affairs, employment market, public health, home affairs and customs. The Commission has proposed that the association between the EU and the OCTs should contribute to the achievement of the sustainable goals, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. In addition, the EU will assist the OCTs in several of their challenges, such as strengthening their resilience and reducing their economic and environmental vulnerability. The finances for the programme for the 2021-2027 period will be raised to EUR 669 million from EUR 500 million, as proposed by the Commission, to focus on the improvement of territorial cooperation and regional cooperation. I voted in favour of this proposal as it is integral that this association continue to foster the development of the OCT nations, as well as promoting the fundamental principles of the EU within them, namely democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights.

2016/11/22

This report outlined that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2017 fell by 20.8% when compared with 2016. I voted in favour of this report as it recommends the need for closer cooperation between Member States regarding the exchange of information, which will significantly improve data collection and enhance the effectiveness of EU controls in this area. It also highlighted a number of measures for the Commission to take note of, which could potentially help in countering fraud and corruption within Member States. One of the most notable recommendations is that the Commission commence an in-depth evaluation of the anti-corruption policies currently adopted by each Member State and develop a systematic, whilst also proportionate, response to the difficult challenge of the ‘revolving door’ effect. In addition, the Parliament agreed that the Commission should report annually the amount recovered when combatting fraud and, following the recommendations then given by the European Anti-Fraud Office, clearly communicate the amounts which are still to be recovered.

2016/11/22

In May 2016, Bayer CropScience AG submitted an application to the Commission for the renewal of the market authorisation of certain products, including feed, containing or consisting of genetically modified oilseed rape Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 x Rf3. These genetically modified oilseed rape have been designed to resist the application of a specific herbicide - glufosinate. However, this herbicide is no longer authorised for use within the EU, classified as a substance which is toxic for reproduction. The Commission has found problems since the current GMO authorisation procedure was implemented and so the Parliament has had to consider whether the Commission’s implementing decisions in this area have been compatible with EU law. Due to these issues, I voted in favour of this objection, which calls on the Commission to withdraw its decision, not authorise the adding to market of genetically modified plants which have been made tolerant to glufosinate and to suspend implementing decisions in this area until the issues with the authorisation procedure have been revised and the shortcomings of the current procedure are remedied.

2016/11/22

The Parliament has previously voted against the Commission’s implementing decision to authorise products containing, or consisting of, genetically modified maize 5307. This particular modified maize produces a new insecticidal protein, eCry3.1Ab, which is toxic to some beetles and weevils. In 2015, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) could not complete risk assessment for the maize due to shortcomings in the 28-day toxicity study provided by the applicant. This objection discusses that there needs to be sufficient testing of the Bt toxin in order for thorough conclusions to be reached about its potential health impacts after consumption. The Commission has found problems since the current GMO authorisation procedure was implemented and so the Parliament has had to consider whether the Commission’s implementing decisions in this area have been compatible with EU law. Due to these issues, I voted in favour of this objection, which calls on the Commission to withdraw its decision and to suspend implementing decisions for GMP authorisations’ until the issues with the authorisation procedure have been revised and the shortcomings of the current procedure are remedied.

2016/11/22

Maize MON87403 has been genetically modified to increase the biomass and yield of the ears however, the outcome of field tests have shown only a small and inconsistent increased yield of the ears and increased biomass. In addition, the potential risks posed by this GM maize to human and animal health and the environment has not been adequately examined by the European Food Safety Authority GMO Panel. It is not appropriate the Commission to authorise the adding to the market of this maize based merely on an opinion by the EFSA and not backed-up by a sufficient study. The Commission has found problems since the current GMO authorisation procedure was implemented and so the Parliament has had to consider whether the Commission’s implementing decisions in this area have been compatible with EU law. Due to these issues, I voted in favour of this objection, which calls on the Commission to withdraw its decision and to suspend implementing decisions for GMP authorisations’ until the issues with the authorisation procedure have been revised and the shortcomings of the current procedure are remedied.

2016/11/22

In February 2011, Bayer CropScience AG submitted an application to the Commission for the renewal of the market authorisation of certain foods, including feed, containing or consisting of cotton GHB614 x LLCotton25 x MON 15985 and the sub-combination LLCotton25 x MON 15985. These genetically modified cottons have been designed to resist the application of a specific herbicide - glufosinate. However, this herbicide is no longer authorised for use within the EU, classified as a substance which is topic for reproduction. The Commission has found problems since the current GMO authorisation procedure was implemented and so the Parliament has had to consider whether the Commission’s implementing decisions in this area were compatible with EU law. Due to these issues, I voted in favour of this objection, which calls on the Commission to withdraw its decision, not authorise the adding to market of genetically modified plants which have been made tolerant to glufosinate and to suspend implementing decisions in this area until the issues with the authorisation procedure have been revised and the shortcomings of the current procedure are remedied.

2016/11/22

I abstained on the final vote for the Annual Report on Competition Policy. While I supported a number of amendments on this report, including an amendment which called for the Parliament to be given co-decision powers to shape the framework for competition rules, I abstained on this vote because I could not support particular paragraphs in this report, namely paragraphs 35 and 39.Paragraph 35 stresses that Europe needs a strong harmonised framework on reporting and corporate taxation for multinational companies and a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). I could not support this paragraph as Ireland’s ability to maintain its own corporate tax rate is a cornerstone to the Irish economy.Paragraph 39 acknowledges that taxation remains primarily a national competence given the unanimity threshold in the Council and that the choice of policy thereby depends on the political view and orientation of the Member States’ respective national governments and parliaments. The paragraph concludes that there is a need to ensure that national tax policies do not distort fair competition and thereby that tax and competition policy are applied consistently within the internal market. Again, Ireland’s ability to set its own corporate tax rate must remain with the Oireachtas.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report, which highlights that the settlement of commercial matters in the EU is far too slow than it could be, taking on average between three and four years. This leads to substantial losses for business. In the EU, we already have a very successful European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP), which provides a way of solving consumer and other cross-border disputes regarding small amounts within the Union in a swift and cost-effective way, while upholding protection for the rights of the parties. Therefore, this report calls for the adoption of a regulation similar to the ESCP, the European Expedited Civil Procedure (EECP), that would be applicable to cross-border commercial disputes. This would be the best way to address the long waiting times for commercial disputes in the Union and could potentially lead to great savings for European businesses.

2016/11/22

The Space Programme proposed by the European Commission recognises the important role of the European industry. The proposal merges in a single programme the existing Galileo, EGNOS and Copernicus and adds two new initiatives, which are SSA and Govsatcom. The report highlights that a fully integrated Space Programme will exploit synergies between the components, increasing effectiveness and cost efficiency. A single and coherent framework will encourage future investments, increase visibility and offer more flexibility. The new space programme will create innovation partnerships to develop and purchase innovative products and services, facilitate access to testing and processing facilities, promote certification and standardisation. The programme will foster coherence and synergies with Horizon Europe, ensuring collaboration between space-related research and innovation actions.

2016/11/22

The original Cooperation Agreement in the regulation of civil aviation safety entered into force on 1 May 2011. The purpose of the Agreement is, inter alia, to ensure the continuation of high-level cooperation and harmonisation between the United States of America and the European Union in the fields within the scope of the Agreement. The purpose of the amendment is to strengthen EU—US regulatory cooperation, in civil aviation safety, to promote global safety standards, and to enhance the production of civil aeronautical products by taking into account the interests of all concerned actors: pilots, aircraft manufacturers, airport platforms, and airlines. Reinforcing the EU-US partnership, based on shared values and common goals, is key to the development of our aviation sector. Civil aviation contributes more than EUR 500bn a year to the EU GDP, employs more than 9 million people, and is one of the economic sectors most reliant on regulation. I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

The budget of the European Union for the financial year of 2018 was formally adopted on the 30th of November 2017. This report aims to amend this budget in accordance with amendment No 6/2018 adopted by the Commission on 12 October 2018. Essentially, it introduces an update to both the expenditure and the revenue sides of the budget in order to take into account recent developments. This amendment is only minor in comparison to the significant budget amendments adopted in 2016 and 2017, regarding the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the years 2014-2020. I voted in favour of this report, as it is important to recognise that the implementation of 2014-2020 programmes are progressing with a steady momentum and for this reason it is incredibly important that all Member States, as well as the Commission, make up for the major delays resulting from the significant amendments made to the budget in years previous.

2016/11/22

The budget for the 2019 fiscal year was adopted by the Commission in late November 2018 and by the Council in early December 2018. This report details that the Commission had proposed to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to supplement the financial available in the 2019 general budget for the amount of EUR 985 629 138, in order to ensure that measures in the field of migration, refugees and security are appropriately funded. However, after trilogue negotiations between the Commission, the Council and the Parliament, all three bodies agreed that the Flexibility Instrument will be mobilised for EUR 1 164 344 613, as a result of reinforcements within Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ programmes. I voted in favour of this report, as the mobilisation of this instrument, illustrates that there is an absolute need for the budget of the European Union to be more flexible, considering the fact that we cannot predict with absolute certainty what will or will not require more funding in 2019.

2016/11/22

The European Solidarity Fund (EUSF) was established to enable the EU to respond to emergencies caused by natural disasters and to express European solidarity to disaster-stricken regions within Europe. In essence, the EUSF provides financial aid to Member States, and those involved in accession negotiations, where direct damage caused by a natural disaster, or regional disaster, exceeds EUR 3bn in 2011 prices, or 0.6% of the country’s GNI, whichever is lower. The general budget of the EU for 2019 amounts to EUR 50m. The European Parliament has defended in this report that when a country applies for this aid, some of this aid should be disbursed to affected countries in an advance before the final decision has been made, in order to make the Fund more effective. The amount of this advance should not exceed 10% of the total amount requested and not exceed EUR 30m. It also details that the Commission will recover any advances paid unnecessarily from the Member State. I voted in favour of this report, as it is important that these figures be included in the 2019 budget.

2016/11/22

After negotiations between the Council, the Commission and the Parliament at the beginning of December 2018, the 2019 budget of the EU was established. Although the draft budget, submitted by the Parliament to be modified by the Council, does not entirely meet the need for a sustainable, coherent and efficient EU budget, Parliament’s ultimate objective is to provide the EU with a budget that can deliver tangible benefits to the citizens and companies within the Union. Through this report the Parliament also welcomes the increased commitment to Parliament’s main political priorities, namely supporting researchers, young people, SME’s, tackling the root causes of migration, climate change and increasing the security of European citizens. I voted in favour of this report, as I too applaud the increased financial commitments to our priorities. In addition, I support this report as it insists that the agreed reinforcement of Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+ programmes, of €100m in an amending budget in 2019, will be financed through new appropriations and not taken from alternate programmes.

2016/11/22

This report dealt with the future of EU trade negotiations with Japan and contained a significant number of pros and cons. There were concerns raised that this deal lacks concrete, tangible provisions detailing workers’ rights, with no reference to enforcement court or sanctions if there are any violations of labour rights which do not match the labour standards upheld by the European Union. It also underlines that the EU has adopted health and safety standards above those outlined in international agreements and therefore recognises that Japan’s standards in these areas may not be equal to those of the EU. Although not every country is obliged to set standards above the minimum rate, this is cause for concern when considering future economic relations with Japan. However, Japan remains Ireland’s fourth largest trading partner outside the EU and this deal has the potential to create a wealth of opportunities for Irish companies across different sectors. These conflicting points and the strong line of my parliamentary group, ALDE, in favour of this report resulted in my ultimately abstaining from voting on this occasion, as I do not believe that this report is overwhelmingly good or overwhelmingly bad for Irish citizens.

2016/11/22

This report outlines the future of EU-Japan bilateral relations, essentially underlining any aspects of the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) with Japan that the European Parliament applauds or calls into question. The SPA provides a legally binding framework for the future of this relationship, whilst simultaneously increasing cooperation between the EU and Japan in over forty areas, such as the promotion of peace and stability, humanitarian aid, economic matters and research and innovation, to name a few. It commends further cooperation between the two countries, noting in particular the mutual respect and confidence that were strengthened during the negotiation process for the SPA. Importantly, this report does mention the fact that capital punishment continues to be a legal penalty in Japan and calls on the EU to enter into a dialogue with the Japanese Government on the subject with a view to it eventually being abolished. I voted in favour of this report as it outlines why a comprehensive and coherent agreement, detailing the common diplomatic, economic, and cultural and security approach adopted between the EU and Japan, is so important.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report, establishing Horizon Europe, the European Union’s 9th Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, succeeding Horizon 2020. The Commission proposed a budget of EUR 100 billion for Horizon Europe. The programme is planned to run from 2021 to 2027.The general objective of the Horizon Europe programme is to deliver scientific, economic and societal impact from the Union’s investments in research and innovation. This will lead to: (1) the strengthening of the scientific and technological bases of the Union and foster its competitiveness, including in its industry; (2) delivering on the Union strategic priorities; and (3) contributing to tackling global challenges, including the Sustainable Development Goals & Paris Agreement. Horizon Europe is comprised of 3 pillars: Pillar I is ‘Open Science’ which builds on the success of the European Research Council and the Research Infrastructures component in the current framework programme. Pillar II is ‘Global challenges and industrial competitiveness’ which has a more ‘top down’ directed approach addressing Union and global policy and competitiveness challenges and opportunities. Pillar III is ‘Open Innovation’ which focuses on scaling up breakthrough and market-creating innovation by establishing a European Innovation Council, a one stop shop for innovators.

2016/11/22

Although this report highlights the fact that Member States remain first in line to prevent and respond to threats (this is a sovereign issue), there is clearly a need to fully recognise the role of the European Union and of the counter-terrorism measures adopted within the framework of the ‘Security Union’ in supporting them. There is also a need for coordinating and sharing best practices and providing common solutions, which would allow Member States to better counter the phenomena of radicalisation, extremism and terrorism. The European Union, as an area without internal borders, needs action at an EU level to ensure a high level of security across the European territory. In addition, deepening cooperation and the exchange of information between Member States and with the European Union is crucial to effectively respond to and prevent terrorist threats and protect citizens. Also, this report stresses the importance of the exchange of good practices between Member States within the European Union as a major initiative to counter any future terrorist attack. I voted in favour of this report, which strives to make the EU a safer place for citizens and urges the Member States and EU institutions to work towards a common strategic culture.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report. It highlights four major priorities for the EU, and these should be the basis for a European Foreign Security Policy. The first priority is the promotion and safeguarding of universal values such as peace, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, including minority rights. Secondly, a commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order with the support of the UN system and regional organisations.The third priority is an emphasis on conflict prevention and management, mediation, peaceful conflict resolution, peace building and institution building. The final priority is the promotion of sustainable development, aid and economic cooperation, fair trade, climate-friendly agreements and alternative sources of energy. Furthermore, the report also highlights the important work the EU and its Member States carry out internationally. Based on the collective contributions of EU institutions and individual Member States, the EU is the world’s leading development aid donor.

2016/11/22

I voted against this report. The launch of a European Defence Fund will be used to support investments in joint research and the joint development of defence products and technologies, thus fostering synergies and cost—effectiveness, and to promote the Member States’ joint purchase and maintenance of defence equipment. However, this fund would also be used to complement national funding already used for this purpose and would act as an incentive for Member States to invest more in defence. Therefore, I could not support this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ In order to achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to stimulate job creation and respect the long-term decarbonisation commitments, the Union needs an up-to-date, multimodal high-performance infrastructure to help connect and integrate the Union and all its regions, including remote, outermost, insular, peripheral and mountainous ones, in the transport, digital and energy sectors. Those connections should help to improve the free movement of persons, including persons with reduced mobility (PRM), and of goods, capital and services. The trans-European networks should facilitate cross-border connections, foster greater economic, social and territorial cohesion and contribute to a more competitive and sustainable social market economy and to combating climate change.The aim of the Connecting Europe Facility (the ‘Programme’) is to accelerate investment in the field of trans-European networks and to leverage funding from both the public and the private sectors, while increasing legal certainty and respecting the principle of technological neutrality. The Programme should enable synergies between the transport, energy and digital sectors to be harnessed to the full extent, thus enhancing the effectiveness of Union action and enabling implementing costs to be optimised. Therefore, I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report which was based on both a fact-finding mission to Ukraine by the Foreign Affairs Committee and three expert studies - on electoral reform, on the level of implementation of the Association Agreement and on the institutional framework for this implementation. The findings of the Foreign Affairs Committee provide a positive image of the implementation of the Association Agreement with Ukraine but a number of shortcomings by Ukrainian authorities were highlighted. There have been positive developments in many areas, notably judiciary, decentralisation, energy, health, pension and education. However concerns remain regarding (1) A proper functioning legal framework to fight corruptions, including institutions, financial transparency and audit; (2) Finalisation of the decentralisation reform and (3) Lack of efforts in de-oligarchisation and privatisation. While calling on the Ukrainian authorities to address these concerns in line with the AA and other bilateral commitments, the report also highlights the European Parliament’s position in relations to ongoing reforms. These include (A) The calls to lift the e-declarations for NGOs activists, (B) full independence of the prosecutor general and (C) rapid establishment of the High Anti-Corruption Court and to provide it with appropriate means for its functioning.

2016/11/22

Technology is evolving at an incredible rate, transforming many aspects of our lives and societies, including the labour market, with changes occurring in many professions across all industries. These continuous changes mean that we need a proper response from our education systems to ensure the digital education of our citizens, employees and employers. With these rapid changes, our education systems are struggling to adapt, most strikingly in terms of teaching skills and providing training for teachers. Many initiatives that exist in this area, such as the Digital Education Action Plan or even smaller-scale initiatives such as EU Code Week, are promising but stem from different directorates-general of the European Commission. These initiatives could be more effective if there were greater levels of coordination and cooperation across departments. This report highlights that there is a large disparity across Member States concerning levels of digital skills, with many schools not sufficiently digitally connected despite possibilities for funding at EU level. This lack of connectivity results in a lack of digital skills education. I voted in favour of this proposal, as initiatives to improve the teaching of digital skills should be improved and coordinated at EU level.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Proper implementation and appropriate funding of EU environmental and climate legislation and policy are necessary in order for us to meet the international environmental and climate commitments that the EU and our Member States have agreed to. The European Parliament has worked to ensure a sufficient level of funding for the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2021-2027, as well as a greater amount of budgetary resources dedicated to areas that stimulate sustainable economic growth. In this report, Parliament outlined that an increase in climate-related spending to a minimum of 30% in the MFF for 2021-2027 is essential. In addition, this report details that a considerable amount of the proposed increase in the Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE) has been allocated to the new Clean Energy Transition sub-programme and, more specifically, used for the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. I voted in favour of this report as the protection of the environment is not an obstacle to economic growth and employment, but rather is vital for long-term socio-economic prosperity and global competitiveness. It is incredibly important that the EU continue to be a global frontrunner for sustainable economic growth and employment.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report aims to improve and clarify the current legal environment in order to ensure the protection of workers’ health. Specifically, this report emphasises that occupational exposure to chemical carcinogens or mutagens in the workplace must be reduced, whilst also stressing the importance of a more level playing field to exist for economic operators. In addition, this references that cancer is the number one cause of work-related deaths in the EU, with seven to twelve people dying of work-related cancer every hour according to Commission’s figures in 2017. I voted in favour of this proposal as it could potentially improve the protection of at least 4 million workers, whilst simultaneously making regulations in this area clear for employers. Importantly, this report also mentions that identifying the causes of why some companies may fail to comply with the Directive, and presenting possible solutions to their issues, would potentially make this Directive more effective, especially in cases of small and medium-sized enterprises. Ultimately, I welcome this report as a member of the Employment Committee, as it seeks to provide greater protection for workers in the workplace.

2016/11/22

The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is one of the longest-established EU agencies. It produces many high-quality data analyses on vocational education and training systems and policies, giving it a high degree of credibility with political decision-makers. Importantly, Cedefop also fosters exchanges of ideas and good practices. Cedefop has gradually broadened the scope of its activities to cover skills and qualifications, in order for them to more accurately take account of significant economic, social, political and technological developments. The digital age has changed the way we look at vocational educational and training policies, as well as creating jobs which did not exist several years ago. This also means that skills and qualifications will constantly have to change and develop to meet the needs of the economy. Due to these reasons, Cedefop’s objectives and tasks have changed drastically over the past few decades. I voted in favour of this report, as it will revise Cedefop’s Founding Regulation, originally created in 1975, to ensure that it accurately reflects the current nature of the agency’s work.

2016/11/22

The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) seeks to make European workplaces safer, healthier and more productive, promoting a culture of risk prevention and sharing knowledge of good practise on health and safety. I voted in favour of this report as it details that particular aspects of the EU-OSHA’s organisation need to be streamlined and that important principles, such as evaluation, transparency and cost-effectiveness, need to be properly reinforced. Some of the revisions emphasise the need for effective communication and transparency within this Agency, taking full advantage of modern communication methods. By utilising all methods of communication, this Agency can extend its circle of potential beneficiaries, to include micro and small enterprises and their employees. The revision of the EU-OSHA is being conducted in parallel to the similar revisions of CEDEFOP and Eurofound. This is in order to identify and examine any possible overlaps in the activities of these Agencies’ and insure that their efficiency is maximised.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report outlines the proposed revisions to the Founding Regulation of Eurofound as presented by the Commission, in order to provide a clearer description of the agency’s role in supporting the Commission, other EU institutions and Member States in shaping policies regarding living and working conditions. It also details that the mandate of Eurofound will be updated, with a stipulation that the current mandate is for the agency to be a centre for analysis, research and policy monitoring. In addition, Eurofound’s objectives will be properly adjusted to reflect its current contribution to the development of social and employment-related policies. This includes providing relevant and high-quality research output in the areas of employment, industrial relations and working and living conditions. I voted in favour of this report, as Eurofound is an important centre for promoting research and fostering dialogue between social players, and it is essential that it evolves to keep pace with a changing Europe.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The date of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union is set for 30 March 2019, at which point EU legislation will cease to apply in the UK. Therefore, from this point on all manufacturers that have previously obtained a UK type approval will require a new EU type approval. This report proposes that the manufacturers concerned may submit applications to any EU27 type-approval authority, so as to ensure that the current framework on Union type-approval legislation will maintain the same standards post Brexit. In addition, it states that this regulation must enter into force as soon as possible, in order to give manufacturers the necessary time to prepare for the UK’s withdrawal.The purpose of the report is to ensure that there will be minimum impact on trade and market access: that although Brexit may mean the UK has restricted access to the single market, trade should not come to a complete halt. I voted in favour of this report, as it attempts to lessen the impact that this withdrawal may have on manufacturers and the industry, as well as providing the industry with more preparedness and certainty.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Despite many announcements and requests for the establishment of safe and legal pathways offering access to European territory for persons seeking international protection, there is no harmonisation of protected entry procedures at EU level, nor is there a comprehensive EU-wide legal framework for humanitarian visas. This report details that Member States should have the possibility to issue European Humanitarian Visas to such people for the sole purpose of making an application for international protection within that particular Member State. These visas would not be a substitute for existing national entry procedures for humanitarian protection or resettlement, and any decision to issue them would be taken solely by the Member States. Additionally, any initiative involving these visas would be without prejudice to other migration policy initiatives, including those to address root causes of migration.I voted in favour of this report, as there is an absolute need for the European Union to establish specific safe and legal pathways to the territory of the EU, of which the European Humanitarian Visa could be one. Safe pathways would better ensure the protection of the most vulnerable migrants.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report aims to amend the Commission’s most recent proposal on Regulation (EC) No 810/2009, concerning the establishment of a Community Code on Visas. One of the agreed upon amendments involves ensuring that those who have been refused a visa have the right to an effective and prompt judicial appeal and are given detailed information on the refusal grounds. Another details that appropriate measures for the monitoring and evaluation of this Regulation must be adopted, to ensure consistency in the processing of visa applications.Importantly, this report also adds many references to the importance of respecting human dignity and fundamental rights, as referred to in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. As such, visa applications should not only be processed on a non-discriminatory basis, but the entire foundation of the common visa policy should remain consistent with other EU policies, including those discussing freedom of movement, residence and mobility.I voted in favour of the overall agreed upon amendments, ultimately because I believe that the common visa policy should strive to generate growth, whilst simultaneously remaining coherent with other EU policies in this area, including external relations, trade, education, culture and tourism.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report aims to amend the Commission’s most recent proposal on Directive 2006/112/EC, which aims to amend the common system of VAT, taking into account the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism (GRCM) on goods and services above a certain threshold. The original document states that Member States that fulfil certain criteria regarding their fraud levels should be allowed to use a GRCM. One of the Parliament’s amendments adds to this by detailing that those Member States using a GRCM should be required to establish that estimated gains in tax compliance and collection expected as a result of the introduction of the GRCM outweigh the estimated overall additional burdens on businesses and tax administrations. Another details that data sharing between Member States on the subject of GRCM will be subjected to personal data protection and confidentiality provisions. I voted in favour of this report, as the amendments proposed by Parliament add positively to the work of the Commission and flesh out many of the aspects so that they are more concrete.

2016/11/22

. ‒ In 2007, as part of the Act of Accession to the EU Bulgaria and Romania adopted the ‘Schengen acquis’, which stated that certain provisions, including the abolition of checks at internal borders, would apply to these two countries after they had met a specific set of conditions. In 2011, the Council ruled that Romania and Bulgaria had successfully fulfilled the conditions required of them. Despite this, the Council has not made a decision regarding the accession of both countries to the Schengen area. This proposal urges the Council to make this decision as soon as possible and remove all checks in these countries at internal land, sea and air borders with a binding legal act. There have been suggestions that a two-step approach should instead be adopted to move this procedure along, which would establish two different timeframes for the abolition of checks at land, sea and air borders. I voted in favour of this report as this approach could negatively affect the future enlargement of the Schengen area and perhaps even create lines of division within the European Union.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report predominantly deals with the establishment of military mobility within the Schengen area, facilitating free movement of troops and military equipment within the majority of the EU. It details that military mobility is an essential strategic tool to pursue the EU’s security and defence interests, whilst also ensuring the ability to intervene in crises abroad. In addition, it urges that the EU and NATO intensify their cooperation in this area, commending the EUR 6.5 billion from the Connecting Europe Facility that the Commission has set aside for military mobility between 2021-2027.I voted against this report as it encourages the civil-military cooperation and EU-militarisation, envisions military mobility as an integral part of the EU becoming a rapid intervention force outside EU territory and, potentially limits funds for necessary civilian infrastructure projects as military deployment may be prioritised. There are also many references to the EU’s cooperation with NATO, enhancing and deepening any future cooperation in military mobility matters, something which is not necessarily in Ireland’s best interests as a neutral country and non-NATO member.

2016/11/22

At present, the European Union is facing many challenges, including growing social inequalities, a rise in populism and radicalisation, and security threats that both threaten European integration and cause concern that solidarity between Member States is perhaps not as strong as it should be. Therefore, it is important to recognise that which connects us, most notably our culture, as this can create a sense of belonging and promote active citizenship. Europe’s cultural sectors are also economically resistant, offer a higher percentage of youth employment than most others and, are the third largest employer in the EU. This report emphasises that there is a need to shape a coherent, comprehensive and sustainable EU cultural policy. In addition, it commends the creation of the Creative Europe Programme (2014-2020), but simultaneously underlines that this Programme requires an appropriate-sized budget and simplified administration procedures in order to overcome any obstacles to progress. I voted in favour of this report, as investing in this employment sector has many benefits, most notably reducing youth unemployment, as well as uniting all Member States in our diversity.

2016/11/22

. ‒ When Parliament adopted legislation introducing the Euro 5 (gas and diesel) emissions requirements for two, three and some four-wheeled vehicles, the co-legislators provided for a comprehensive environmental study to be carried out to detail how the transition to Euro 5 should take place, particularly for subsets of the L-category class of vehicles. This report addresses the legislative proposals that followed publication of the environmental study. Specifically, it discusses the requirement to install an on-board diagnostic (OBD) stage II system on these vehicles. OBD systems ensure the monitoring and reporting on emission control system failures.Based on the aforementioned study there are technical limitations in some monitoring aspects of the system and further development is needed to ensure that it is implemented correctly. As a result, it is necessary to implement an exemption for categories L1e and L2e from the OBD system requirement and for this exemption to also extend to light quadricycles and to certain motorcycle subcategories.I voted in favour of this report, as I believe it is important that we follow the recommendations made in the environmental study regarding postponement of the application of Euro 5 requirements for these specific classes of vehicles.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning the trade of certain goods that could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishments. The main element of Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 encompasses the prohibition of the export and import of goods which have no practical use other than any form of capital punishment or torture. For those that do have another use, an export authorisation licence is required and one will not be issued if there are reasonable grounds to assume that they will be used for the aforementioned purposes. I voted in favour of this proposal as it does not alter the content of this Regulation, but it brings together the content of it under a common system through the process of codification.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The Commission presented Parliament with this text, detailing recommendations on how best to re-commit the remaining amounts committed to support the implementation of Council Decisions which detail the priorities of the European Union and the Member States in specific areas of migration and asylum. Mostly, this proposal consists of Parliament recommended amendments to the Commission’s text. These include ensuring that all allocations of these funds take place in full respect of the principles set out in the Financial Regulation, most notably in an efficient and transparent manner.The original text from the Commission outlined that the target group eligible for relocation be expanded to assure more flexibility for Member States when carrying out relocations, however, our amendments change this slightly to urging that the expansion should extend to the countries from where the relocation will take place too. There is also specific mention that the relocation of unaccompanied minors, other vulnerable applicants and family members of beneficiaries of international protection be given priority. I voted in favour of this text, as I believe the amended version will improve the process and end result of the re-committing of these remaining amounts.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal includes provisions for the approval of Samoa’s accession to the EU-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement (EPA). The EPA is a development-oriented trade agreement that provides Samoa with particular market access and allows it to protect sensitive sectors from liberalisation, while offering numerous safeguards and a clause to protect some infant industries in Samoa. Samoa had been originally benefiting from the EU’s Everything-but-Arms trade preferences, but due to Samoa graduating from least developed country status in 2014, it will lose access to these preferences as of January 2019. If the EPA agreement is applied to Samoa provisionally before then, Samoa will maintain the current duty-free and quota-free access to the EU on all products with the exception of arms and ammunition. Samoan exports to the EU are extremely significant to the Samoan economy, meaning it is vital that the EPA come into force in January 2019 to avoid any disruption in Samoa-EU trade flows. I voted in favour of this proposal as it aims to support the development of Samoa and the interests of Samoan citizens.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Greece has submitted this application under the intervention criteria requiring that at least 500 workers in the same economic sector, as defined under the NACE Revision 2 Division, became redundant over a period of nine months. Their application outlines that from 29 May 2017 to 28 February 2018 there were 550 redundancies in the economic sector, all of which occurred in Attica. The expected impact in the territory is linked to the difficulties of redeployment due to the disproportionate numbers of job-seekers to available long-term jobs. The Commission has concluded that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) are met and therefore proposes that the EGF be mobilised for EUR 2 308 500, representing 60% of the total costs of the actions proposed by Greece in response to this crisis. I voted in favour of this proposal as Attica currently accounts for 34.7% of total Greek unemployment and 36% of long-term employment and it is necessary that the requested amount be transferred.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The Schengen area is one of the greatest achievements of European integration. However, it has never been more fragile than it is today due to the recent challenges the EU has faced. A lack of trust between some Member States has resulted in some reintroducing internal border controls in recent years, putting at risk future processes of political integration within the EU, as well as our economies.In September 2017, the Commission proposed amending the Schengen Borders Code to allow Member States to reintroduce internal border controls where there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State for up to five years. Under current rules these controls may only be utilised for a maximum of two years. This report rejects the Commission’s proposal to amend the Code as it could legalise current illegal practices of Member States regarding their internal border controls.I voted in favour of this proposal as it instead solidifies that any changes to the Code, regarding the reintroduction of internal border controls, should make the legal framework clearer and ensure their use is proportionate when responding to actual needs, including an appropriately limited time frame.

2016/11/22

This report discusses some of the prominent issues in the current German family law system, including the controversial role of the German Youth Welfare Office (Jugendamt), which has been denounced through several petitions submitted by non-German parents. The Petitions Committee has detailed that the petitions they have received on this subject detail instances of serious discrimination by the Jugendamt towards non-German parents, particularly in cross-border family disputes involving children. I voted in favour of this report as it denounces instances where non-German parents are prevented from communicating with their children in their mother tongue during visits, as they constitute discrimination on the grounds of language. These instances also absolutely go against the aim of fostering multilingualism and diversity of cultural backgrounds within the Union and are in breach of the fundamental rights of thought, conscience and religion. This resolution is important as it reiterates that Member States that there is a need to provide foster care to children which takes into account their ethnic, religious, linguistic and cultural identities.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The WTO has played an essential role in strengthening multilateralism, promoting an inclusive world economic order and fostering an open, rules-based and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system. In addition, as developing countries now account for half of the world’s trade, the number of people living in extreme poverty has been reduced by half since 1990. This resolution highlights that transparency is a key element in ensuring a stable and predictable trading and investment environment and recommends that in the future the WTO should work to enhance the transparency of monitoring procedures. It is imperative that the EU works to enhance transparency by increasing incentives for Members to comply with notification requirements. I voted in favour of this resolution as it also emphasises that the EU continue to ensure that its activities with developing countries, in the areas of development and trade, are based on a balanced framework through the co-operation with the WTO and are aimed at the promotion of and respect for human rights.

2016/11/22

This report is comprised of detailed information regarding Serbia’s progress on the path of integration into the European Union, if they continue to deliver real and sustained reforms and definitive solutions to disputes with neighbours. It highlights the progress made by Serbia in developing a functioning market economy, ensuring economic growth and preserving monetary stability, as well as calling for Serbia to develop a sustainable plan for the future of state-owned enterprises, considering that SME’s are an essential component to Serbia’s economy. However, it also references some concerns that the European Union continues to have surrounding the persistent unemployment rates in Serbia and emphasises the importance of training and developing entrepreneurial skills among young people, in addition to improving the position of women in the labour market. I voted in favour of this report as it provides a thorough background on Serbia’s progress, as well as offering recommendations for them to strengthen the role and capacity of its authorities concerning the protection of vulnerable groups, including women, children and those with disabilities.

2016/11/22

This report details information on the current situation in Kosovo and the country’s progress in the EU accession process. Kosovo has made some positive steps forward in the spirit of good neighbourly relations in ratifying the August 2015 Border Demarcation Agreement with Montenegro. However, their pace in implementing fundamental reforms remains slow, caused by a lack of cross-party consensus and continued political polarisation. There is also a need for the Kosovan authorities to improve the effectiveness and transparency of law-making. Importantly, it also highlights the concerning amount of inter-ethnic incidents, strongly condemning all acts of intimidation and violence, and urges Kosovo’s authorities to immediately distance themselves from such acts. I voted in favour of this report, as in addition to all the issues mentioned above, this report details that gender inequality and gender-based violence continues to persist within Kosovo and urges that its authorities implement gender equality and anti-discrimination legislation, which should include a strategy and action plan against domestic violence. There is also most assuredly a need for Kosovo to implement the provisions of the Istanbul Convention as stipulated in this report.

2016/11/22

This report welcomes the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s strong political commitment in implementing the 2015 Pržino Agreement, agreed upon by the four main political parties, which has led to an intensification of efforts on EU-related reforms, based on transparent and inter-ethnic cooperation. It further endorses the improvements that have been made in electoral legislation, encouraging that the new government maintain the positive momentum that has been built. With the Prespa Agreement of June 2018, Greece and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have made significant efforts in order to reach a solution to the name issue, including the September 2018 referendum. This proposal also backs the Commission’s recommendation, setting June 2019 as a date for opening accession negotiations. In addition, it stresses bilateral issues should not obstruct the accession process. I voted in favour of this resolution, as it highlights how the Government of this country has made significant gains in trust-building efforts, as well as settling open bilateral issues and fostering good neighbourly relations, which are all positive steps forward.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This report welcomes Albania’s efforts and steady progress on the implementation of EU-related reforms, specifically justice reform, and calls on Albania to consolidate the reforms achieved and continue to raise public awareness about the process of joining the European Union. It also supports the Commission’s recommendation that accession negotiations for Albania be opened, in recognition of its reform efforts, and it recognises that the Council has decided to re-evaluate the situation in June 2019, with the preparatory screening process having begun already.I voted in favour of the report because, in addition to recognising these next steps for Albania, it details the fact that Albania has made significant progress in increasing women’s participation and representation in politics, with an increased representation of women in the new government. I also support the concerns the report raises in relation to appropriate measures for the protection of women in more marginalised groups, and the specific request that the Albanian authorities strengthen their policies towards people with disabilities, who continue to face difficulties in accessing education, employment, healthcare and social services.

2016/11/22

This report details Montenegro’s progress in the EU integration process, detailing that their engagement has resulted in good progress overall. It outlines that the reforms Montenegro have applied remain a key indicator of their potential for successful integration. However, it urges Montenegro to improve their methods of planning, coordinating and monitoring any new legislation or policies that are introduced. There is a need for the Commission and the Council to ensure that there are adequate provisions in place in the next multiannual financial framework to cater for Montenegro’s possible accession to the European Union. This report also mentions that Montenegro’s political leadership needs to focus on their remaining challenges, such as the rule of law, media freedom, corruption and organised crime. In addition, there needs to be more legislation surrounding the public and political participation of women and minorities, in order to allow minorities and women to meaningfully participate in the decision-making processes of society. I voted in favour of this report, as Montenegro has indeed made great progress in the integration process, and it is important to recognise their successes, as well as the areas where they can still improve.

2016/11/22

This report recognises the importance of academic freedom in public statements, policies and actions relating to the EU’s external action and that the autonomy of education institutions be protected at all times. Academic freedom plays an essential role in the educational advancement and the development of humankind and modern society. Claims to academic freedom fall under existing human rights law, derived from the right to education and the right to freedom of expression. I voted in favour of this report as it encourages regular dialogue with university communities and organisations whose mission it is to protect higher education communities and promote academic freedom, as this will lead to the development of best policy frameworks, initiatives and advocacy strategies for academic freedom. In addition, it importantly highlights the potential of new initiatives that may be created through existing and future programmes – such as Horizon 2020, Erasmus+ and the Instrument for Pre-Accession. These initiatives could protect the importance of academic freedom, as mentioned in the report, by supporting the placement of at-risk academics, student researchers and full degree students within international protection status in European higher education and research institutions.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of sending this file to trilogue negotiations. The Commission’s proposal establishes a number of minimum universal rights for EU citizens and workers in response to pressing public demand and a desire to bring citizens closer to the EU by making them feel that Europe counts for them, and counts on them. For example, the directive sets a six-month limit on probation periods, except where a longer period is justified. It also establishes the right to work for other employers by prohibiting ‘exclusivity’ and ‘incompatibility’ clauses, and the right to greater predictability of working hours for people with variable work schedules. With this directive, the EU demonstrates that it wants to rule out any exploitation of, or lack of protection for, workers in new, more flexible, imaginative or adaptable forms of employment.

2016/11/22

Women spending a disproportionate amount of time carrying out unpaid work, predominantly care and domestic activities, in comparison to men has serious economic and social consequences, ultimately impeding the achievement of the EU goals on gender equality. The average women’s employment rate in the EU is 64%, with women continually over-represented in part-time jobs. This goes against the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, as well as undermining the EU target of achieving 75% of men and women in employment by 2020, as outlined under the Europe 2020 strategy. The lack of adequate leave to provide care for dependent relatives is a key root cause for labour market inactivity, or reduced activity, for women. 80% of all care provided across the EU is provided by informal carers, 75% of whom are women. I voted in favour of this proposal as it not only outlines that the definition of care services include; childcare, care for the elderly and care for those with disabilities, but it urges that care services become more accessible and flexible to meet the needs of different families. Importantly, it outlines that care services need to be developed in consultation with intended users and clients.

2016/11/22

The truth is that many people who have Lyme disease are undiagnosed and this is a double whammy for people who suffer from this most debilitating disease. I know in Ireland many patients have to go abroad so that they can be properly tested. It is very expensive for them, many of them have suffered for many years and they cannot get a diagnosis in Ireland. Specialists and doctors will tell them: clinically, the results say you’re fine. They go abroad and they get a diagnosis of Lyme disease. I believe that the EU can act in a much stronger way by strongly encouraging a harmonised, accurate test for Lyme disease so that all EU citizens can have access to timely and accurate diagnosis. I voted in favour of this resolution which was passed by a huge majority in the Plenary, that means most MEPs voted for it. That is a very strong message to the Commission to act on the proposals that are in the resolution. It also means MEPs can follow up with the Commission asking what, if any, progress has been made on implementing any of the proposals in the resolution.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of the MFF Report. Parliament wishes to maintain the current level of funding for the EU budget. This would mean Member States would need to contribute more, due to the UK leaving the EU. My Group called for doubling the current budget of Erasmus+, pointing to the fact that the volume of eligible applications for this flagship programme is by far exceeding its resources. A compromise was reached to increase the budget for 2019 by about 29% for the education and training strand and by about 6% for the youth strand compared to the budget of 2018. Under youth unemployment, I supported the increase of the Youth Employment Initiative. However, it should not replace financing of former national policies.I also supported the SME instrument and increasing innovation in SMEs through Horizon 2020. The report highlights that the EU budgetary guarantee facilitates access to finance for SMEs. Successful agreement was reached on the future budget for Horizon 2020 which allows support for digitalisation of public administrations, ICT education and training across the entire society and the competitiveness of the EU’s cybersecurity and ICT industries.

2016/11/22

There are well-established differences in the legal status of EU money either directly paid to final beneficiaries or indirectly paid via national authorities; however, there is often still confusion by national or regional authorities on which EU funds automatically allocate money under state aid rules and which do not. This proposal will amend the EU State aid Enabling Regulation in order to improve the interplay of EU funding programmes that follow state aid rules. It will also enable the Commission to make certain modifications to the General Block Exemption Regulation so that nationally managed and centrally managed EU funds can be combined as smoothly as possible, without distorting competition in the Single Market. I voted in favour of this proposal, as this should also contribute to administrative simplification, something which is incredibly important in order to ensure national authorities are more clear on which funds they can access as State aid or not.

2016/11/22

National Competition Authorities (NCAs) play an important role in the enforcement of EU competition law, significantly contributing to a properly functioning, competitive and consumer-oriented market. In order for the functions of NCAs to be maintained and strengthened, their enforcement powers need to be backed by specific procedures and guiding principles. These will ensure a more uniform and effective enforcement of competition rules throughout the EU. By recommending guiding principles for NCAs, this proposal could result in practical benefits for countering the distortion of competition and, is an important step towards developing the full potential of the EU’s internal market. It also highlights how important it is for NCAs to remain impartial; meaning their protection against political and business influences is another key element of this proposal. I voted in favour of this proposal as implementing guarantees against conflicts of interest and including transparent selection and dismissal commitments by the NCAs only strengthen this report. These provisions can be incredibly beneficial for raising awareness about and increasing public trust in NCAs.

2016/11/22

Establishing emission performance requirements for new heavy-duty-vehicles (HDVs) has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, thus contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the mitigation of climate change, while at the same time delivering significant fuel savings to transport operators. More fuel-efficient HDVs are beneficial to both the climate and the European economy as they reduce road transport emissions and can help businesses save transport costs. Currently, HDVs account for almost a quarter of road transport CO2 emissions while simultaneously making up less than 5% of the vehicles on the road. There has been very little improvement in the fuel efficiency of these vehicles over the last few decades. I voted in favour of this proposed regulation, as it represents a historic opportunity to improve the fuel efficiency of HDVs, reduce their CO2 emissions, potentially create more competition between European manufacturers of HDVs and, help European businesses to save fuel, transport costs and lower their respective CO2 emissions.

2016/11/22

This proposal recommends that a comprehensive EU mechanism for the protection of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights be established, in order to tackle the recent highlighted challenges to these principles in various Member States. There have been rising concerns regarding democracy and the rule of law in Malta, Slovakia and Romania and the high number of infringement procedures against several Member States in the field of justice, fundamental rights and citizenship.These challenges have the potential to directly undermine the legitimacy of the European Union’s external action, specifically regarding its accession and neighbourhood policies. In 2016, the Parliament passed a resolution calling for the Commission to present a proposal detailing a comprehensive mechanism on these principles to no avail. Therefore, I voted in favour of this proposal as it calls on the Commission to adopt an inter-institutional agreement on the EU pact on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights.

2016/11/22

Four years after the signing by the EU of three Association Agreements (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, and two years after their full entry into force, the Parliament has decided to evaluate the level of implementation of these agreements. Over the last six months, the Foreign Affairs Committee has commissioned three expert studies on Georgia detailing electoral reform, the level of implementation of the AA, and the institutional framework for this implementation. The findings of these studies provide a positive image of the implementation of the AA in partnership with Georgia. Although this proposal calls on the Georgian authorities to address some of the remaining concerns highlighted in these studies regarding labour standards, environmental protection and discrimination against vulnerable groups, the proposal welcomes the legislative and institutional steps taken in order to address those concerns. I voted in favour of this proposal as, in addition to addressing the concerns, it also outlines the institutional framework in place to implement the AA, from both the EU and Georgian perspectives, to ensure full implementation of the relevant legislation and the monitoring thereof.

2016/11/22

Four years after the signing by the EU of three Association Agreements (AA) including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine and two years after their full entry into force, Parliament has decided to evaluate the level of implementation of these agreements. In April 2018, the Foreign Affairs Committee undertook a fact-finding mission, commissioning three expert studies detailing electoral reform, the level of implementation of the AA and, the institutional framework for this implementation. Their findings provide a contrasting image of the implementation of the AA with Moldova. There has been increased backsliding on behalf of Moldova on core values of democratic standards, the essential elements of the AA. However, there have been positive developments in a number of areas covered by both the AA and the DCFTA, such as the actions taken to improve the financial sector, minimising the risk of a repetition of a large-scale bank fraud, growing cooperation in the field of energy and an impressive increase in bilateral trade through the implementation of the DCFTA. I voted in favour of this proposal as recognising the successes and faults of the implementation of the AA is imperative going forward.

2016/11/22

In 2017, Latvia experienced a long-lasting period of intense rainfall, leading to widespread flooding, destroying crops and significantly damaging watercourses, the drainage system, and connected water treatment installations, as well as road and railway infrastructure. This proposal seeks to allow the European Union Solidarity Fund to be utilised in order to assist Latvia, as is permitted under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013. I voted in favour of this proposal, which will allow the allocation of EUR 17 730 510 to Latvia under the European Union Solidarity Fund for the financial year 2018. These funds will be used for the reconstruction of the affected regions and will be allocated as quickly as possible and in a transparent way, guaranteeing a fair distribution throughout the affected regions.

2016/11/22

Between 2009 and 2015, aid allocated to basic education by the European Union decreased by 33.9%. This proposal emphasises the importance of basic learning, including digital literacy and empowering vulnerable groups to end poverty, by addressing two priorities: focusing on quality and inclusive basic education and providing enhanced support to the least developed countries. Therefore, the proposal recommends that the European Union and its Member States commit 10% of their official development assistance to education by 2024, increasing this to 15% by 2030. Placing education at the centre of EU development policies is essential, not just because it is a fundamental right, but because it helps to achieve other sustainable development goals. I voted in favour of this proposal, as these funds will be used to bolster national education systems.

2016/11/22

This multiannual plan intends to manage overfishing in the Adriatic Sea. However, an important amendment, which would have made this plan introduce the quota mechanism already used in the North Sea and the Bay of Biscay, was rejected. This mechanism would have allowed for the fishing of a higher fraction when the biomass stock is high, reducing it when it is low and maintaining a high probability of sufficient spawning stock to ensure full reproductive capacity. This system was extremely beneficial to the pelagic fish stocks (i.e. anchovies and sardines) in the Bay of Biscay where stocks had previously collapsed. Instead, this plan angles to maintain the current regime and reduce overfishing much more gradually. I ultimately voted against this resolution as I had reservations about this plan – most importantly that it will set a bad precedent: one which allows the current excessive overfishing in the area to continue.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This resolution recognises that the current Government in Romania is undermining Romania’s interests in the European Union. There have been a number of alarming political restrictions on the freedom of the media in Romania, as well as worrying changes in legislation, which could have the potential to undermine the independence of the judicial system and the capacity to fight corruption effectively in Romania, and could weaken the rule of law. I voted in favour of this resolution as it calls on the Romanian authorities to put in place safeguards to ensure a transparent and legal basis for all aspects of institutional cooperation, and to avoid any interference that upsets the checks and balances system. It also urges the Romanian authorities to counter any measures which would decriminalise corruption in office.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal offers a complete overview of Parliament’s position on the rights of national, ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in the EU, concentrating on combating discrimination, hate crime and hate speech. In addition, it seeks to protect cultural and linguistic rights, as well as offering a definition of what constitutes national and ethnic minorities. All minorities will be protected, but they are given a wider scope for protection in certain areas, as is the case with regard to linguistic rights.Under this proposal, we call for the Commission to develop a common framework for the protection of minorities, which would take into consideration existing national measures. The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights will also be required to monitor cases of hate crime and hate speech within Member States and to report regularly on these cases and on trends.I voted in favour of the proposal as there is a need concretely to define the minimum protection that minorities within EU Member States should receive with regard to their rights, and also to provide Member States with guidelines to follow to ensure that these rights are upheld.

2016/11/22

Despite the internet becoming more widely available in many developing countries, some of their emerging economies are not benefiting from increased digitalisation as much as others. Many people in these countries continue not to have access to internet communication technologies, with the gaps between countries and between urban and rural areas growing exponentially bigger.This proposal calls for sufficient funding to be allocated under the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF) for streamlining digital technologies into all aspects of development policy. It also promotes the EU’s external investment plan, which is dedicated to promoting investment in innovative digital solutions for local needs, financial inclusion and decent job creation. Parliament also called for the Commission, under this investment plan, to launch new initiatives with a special focus on developing digital infrastructure, increase investment in digital infrastructure in developing countries and mainstream digital technologies and services into the EU’s development policy.I voted in favour of this resolution as digitalisation can be a powerful development tool, allowing people to exercise their economic, civil and political rights. Importantly, in developing countries modern communications technology can allow their populations to participate successfully in the ever changing and modernising world.

2016/11/22

The current EU Member States’ national legislation relates to the protection of cultural goods from their own cultural heritage. It has come to light that the general rules applicable to the trade in goods do not address all the specificities of cultural goods with illicit trafficking of these goods linked to organised crime, terrorism financing, money laundering and tax evasion, all of which result in the loss of cultural heritage from third countries. This proposal seeks to cut the link between the trafficking of cultural goods and any organised crime or terrorism financing, whilst simultaneously giving legal certainty to the licit art market. Therefore, the Commission has suggested within this proposal a number of tools to strengthen the customs control of cultural goods, including; a system of import licenses for products deemed ‘high-risk’ in their potential links to organised crime or terrorist networks, and the creation of a system of standardised documentation requirements at import regarding the identity of each item. I voted in favour of this proposal as it is essential that the funding of terrorism through illicit trade be halted.

2016/11/22

This proposal outlines the ongoing problem of EU funds lost due to fraud, involving the transferral of funds to third countries. There is a need for the EU to avoid transferring funds through financial intermediaries operating in non-transparent and uncooperative jurisdiction, as well as a need to tackle the issue that funds from third countries to the EU can also be transferred fraudulently. This proposal outlines that the Commission must harden its´ stance when signing agreements with third countries by proactively adding anti-fraud clauses. In addition, the Commission must make significant efforts to calculate the amount of EU funds lost in these instances, as there are currently no figures available on this. I voted in favour of this proposal as the mechanism that currently exists to combat money laundering, could be expanded to include a standardised collection method that would eventually lead to the creation of a central EU database on the transfer of fraudulent assets.

2016/11/22

Smaller operators in the food supply chain are more prone to unfair trading practices (UTP´s) due to their bargaining power being weaker than that of the larger operators in the chain. This report proposed a partial harmonisation of UTP rules in the EU food supply chain, whilst introducing a common minimum protection standard in the EU, to help achieve the objective of reducing the occurrence of UTP´s. This protection will apply only to SME suppliers in the food supply chain, specifically when they are selling to buyers whom are not considered SME´s. Member States may also apply additional rules designed to combat UTP´s going above the minimum standard, if those rules also respect the rules of the internal market. I voted in favour of this proposal as due to the increasingly market-oriented nature of the agricultural policy environment, the good governance of the food supply chain has become ever-more important for operators, particularly for agricultural producers.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this proposal as the current directive regarding the charging of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) is not thorough enough, with only 25 % of the trans-European road network covered by distance-based charges for HDVs and ‘polluter pays’ charges not fully realised either. Therefore, this proposal centres on several key issues that the directive should address.First, time-based pricing better reflects actual road usage, emission levels and pollution than distance-based pricing and thus the latter pricing scheme should be phased out by 2023 for HDVs. Second, infrastructure revenues for road maintenance upkeep and improvements, as well as for transport systems overall, should be properly earmarked in order to combat the deterioration of road networks in Europe. Third, revenues from external-cost charges should be used to fund the shift to low-emissions mobility. Lastly, tolling systems become more transparent and acceptable, with road networks covered by infrastructure charge affording a high level of road safety.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this proposal, which involves the amendment of Directive 2009/33/EU, involving the promotion of clean and energy-efficient roads transport by outlining minimum targets in public procurement for clean vehicles. It clarifies the provisions on these minimum procurement targets, including: the dates of entry into force, the duration of periods for the targets, and the relevant moment of the procurement cycle which needs to be taken into account when calculating the targets. It also will contribute to the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, as well as ensuring that vehicles comply with the latest standards of emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases.In order to impose these minimum procurement targets for light- and heavy-duty vehicles, this Directive will require additional financial resources. Therefore, this proposal outlines that the financial policy and budgetary measures implemented after 2020 should take this into consideration, with the EU making additional funding available to support the uptake of clean vehicles.

2016/11/22

This proposal concerned the establishment of a multi-annual plan for demersal fisheries in the EU’s Western Waters, as well as the amendment of the multi-annual plan in existence since 2016 for the Baltic Sea. The basic regulation under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) calls for the establishment of these multi-annual plans, with the aim of putting in place a regionalised fisheries management framework for the exploitation of fish stocks in line with maximum sustainable yield (MSY). The deadline to achieve these MSY fishing levels is 2020, in order to allow all fish stocks to recover above sustainable levels. This proposal outlines that the fisheries of the Western Waters be managed according to the same principles as the multi-annual plans for the North Sea. In addition, it ensures that fisheries management measures are adopted in full accordance with the best available scientific advice available. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it is in line with the CFP and its aims to end overfishing by 2020, and ensures that the negative impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are minimised.

2016/11/22

I supported this proposal, as it aims to ensure economic growth, foster job creation and commit investment into research, innovation, digitalisation, education, infrastructure and SMEs. Outlined specifically in this proposal is that youth unemployment within the EU is lower than in previous years, but that these levels remain unacceptably high in certain Member States. Therefore, the Youth Employment Initiative will be reinforced more strongly, beyond the level initially proposed by the Commission, with emphasis placed on improving its efficiency. In addition, this proposal recognises the importance of programmes such as Erasmus+, Horizon 2020 and COSME, which provide an essential demonstration of the advantages of cooperation within the EU whilst significantly contributing to growth and job creation across the Union.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposal, as failing to grant discharge to the Secretary-General of the Council with respect to the implementation of the Council’s budget for the 2016 financial year has so far not led to consequences of any kind. The report reiterates that the budgets of the European Council and the Council should be separated in order to improve the accountability of both institutions. It also reiterates that the procedure of giving discharge separately to institutions and bodies is a long-standing practice accepted by all other institutions bar the Council. In light of Parliament supporting the Commission’s decision to shift towards performance-based budgeting, this proposal ultimately urges the Council to participate in good faith in the annual discharge as the other institutions do.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal sought to amend the Common Provisions Regulation in order to allow the performance reserve (6% of the resources allocated to the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the Cohesion Fund Investment for Jobs and Growth Goal) to be used for structural reforms instead of the ‘specific priorities’ set out in Partnership Agreements. Structural reforms are increasingly important, and the Committee on Regional Development has already supported an increase in the budget for them. Any Member State opting for a partial or full reallocation of the funds in this performance reserve would propose to the Commission a detailed outline of the measures they would introduce, as well as reform commitments containing firm and specific milestones and targets.I voted in favour of this proposal, as structural reforms tackle obstacles to the drivers of growth: they are designed to boost competitiveness, growth potential and the adjustment capacity of the economy.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Council Decision 2008/615/JHA concerns the importance of increased cross-border cooperation, particularly in the areas of combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and confers powers on the Council to enact measures which implement the decision. These include the receiving and supply of personal data. The purpose of this proposal is to entitle Ireland to receive and supply personal data for the purposes of the automated searching of dactyloscopic data. I voted in favour: as Ireland is already participating in the adoption of this proposed decision, this vote ultimately allows for the launch of the data exchange.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Council Decision 2008/615/JHA regards the importance of increased cross-border cooperation, particularly in the areas of combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and so confers powers on the Council to enact measures which implement this Decision. This includes the receiving and supply of personal data. The purpose of this proposal is to entitle Ireland to receive and supply personal data, for the purposes of the automated searching of DNA data. I voted in favour of this proposal, as Ireland is already participating in the adoption of this proposed decision, this vote ultimately allows for the launch of the data exchange.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Council Decision 2008/615/JHA regards the importance of increased cross-border cooperation, particularly in the areas of combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and so confers powers on the Council to enact measures which implement this Decision. This includes the receiving and supply of personal data. The purpose of this proposal is to entitle Croatia to receive and supply personal data, for the purposes of the automated searching of dactyloscopic data. I voted in favour of this proposal, as Croatia is already participating in the adoption of this proposed decision; this vote ultimately allows for the launch of the data exchange.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This directive marks a significant milestone in the eradication of plastics litter, aiming to ban items such as plastic straws, cotton swabs, disposable plastic plates and cutlery by 2021, with 90% of plastic bottles expected to be recycled by 2025. The ban managed to remain relatively comprehensive, including: cutting down the use of plastics for which no alternatives currently exist (i.e. food packaging) by 25% by 2025, and reducing the use of plastic components in cigarette butts by 50% by 2025 and 80% by 2030. The result of this vote is essentially therefore, a clampdown on the top 10 plastic products that most often end up littering our oceans. These items are also the most problematic throwaway pieces of litter, and so this proposal has successfully ensured that plastic producers will be held accountable for the costs of single-use plastic production, something that has been weakly enforced in Ireland in the past. I voted in favour of this directive as it is an important step forward in reducing plastic pollution across the EU.

2016/11/22

Directive 92/83/EEC, adopted in 1992, outlines the common rules on the structures of excise duty applied to alcohol and alcoholic beverages and provides a legal framework for reduced rates and exemptions. Unfortunately, the Directive has not been keeping pace with the challenges and opportunities offered by new technologies and developments within the alcohol industry. Some of the problems identified continue to persist, causing possible distortions of the internal market. The large variation in duty levels between Member States can provide a strong incentive for tax invasion, as well as requiring the use of burdensome administrative procedures. These can, in turn, allow disproportionate administrative costs to restrict the participation of SMEs in the intra-trade of alcoholic beverages. This proposal essentially seeks to increase the legal certainty of this Directive by clarifying its relevant articles. I voted in favour of this proposal as the clarification of these articles is better achieved at EU level.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal mainly involved the closure of the accounts of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) for the 2016 financial year and whether to grant the new ad interim Executive Director discharge. Following up on the 2013 and 2014 discharges, findings by the Court of Auditors illustrated that two out of five significant procurement procedures from 2016, for which payments were incurred that year, demonstrated a lack of vigour in EASO procurement procedures. Although the investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) into the EASO’s operations is ongoing, the ad interim Executive Director has taken significant, satisfactory steps to improve the governance structure, restore transparency and rebuild trust. The Office also has an action plan in place to remedy the issues found by the Court of Auditors and to strengthen future procurement procedures. In the light of these proactive efforts by the EASO, I voted in favour of this proposal.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Portugal has submitted this application under the intervention criteria requiring that at least 500 workers working in the same economic sector, as defined under the NACE Revision 2 Division, are made redundant over a period of nine months. Their application outlines that from 1 May 2017 to 1 February 2018, 1161 workers in a specific sector were made redundant, which would have a direct and significant negative effect on the local economy. The Commission has concluded that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the EGF are met. Therefore, the EGF will be mobilised for EUR 4 655 883 representing 60% of the total costs of the three types of actions proposed by Portugal in response to this crisis. I voted in favour of this proposal which will transfer the relevant budgetary line for the requested amount.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Access to high quality drinking water remains an important issues for EU citizens and one which affects their daily lives and their health. The Drinking Water Directive, one of the pillars of current EU water legislation, was drafted at the end of the 1980s and has not been thoroughly reviewed since then. This proposal aims to revise this directive to align drinking water quality standards with the most recent scientific data and to adapt the legislation to better meet challenges such as climate change. There are four areas where improvements can be made illustrated in this proposal, namely; the list of parameters, the use of a risk-based approach, the need for greater transparency, and access to information for consumers on the water they use and the materials which come into contact with drinking water. I voted in favour of this proposal as the European Citizens´ Initiative ‘Right2Water’ had such a significant amount of support by people across the EU and I believe that the proposed revisions to this directive are an important step forward in achieving universal access to safe and affordable drinking water for all.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal amends the Regulation which outlines the financing of the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI), by the European Structural and Investment Fund (ESI Fund) for the year 2018. The YEI is a part of the Youth Guarantee, a scheme under which Member States actively implement measures to ensure that young people up to the age of 25, within four months of leaving school or becoming unemployed, receive a good quality offer of either; employment, continued education, or an apprenticeship or traineeship. Some of the proposed 2020 appropriations have been frontloaded to 2018, with an increased amount of EUR 116.7 million given to the YEI, increasing their budget for 2018 to EUR 350 million. The appropriations for 2020 need to be adjusted downwards accordingly to reflect this frontloading. I voted for this proposal, which will allow for the text of this Regulation to be amended slightly to account for the needed adjustment.

2016/11/22

In June 2017, the Commission published a comprehensive fitness check evaluation on the reporting and monitoring of EU environment policy and, in review of this evaluation, drew up an action plan. This check covered 181 reporting obligations found in 58 pieces of legislation, finding room for improvement in several areas of legislation. This proposal suggests a revision or the several existing legislative acts that fall under the Commission’s Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT), in order to improve the evidence base for the implementation of EU environmental policy, increase transparency for the public and simplify reporting in order to reduce the administrative burden. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it will ensure that different legislative acts involving environment policy adopt a coherent approach.

2016/11/22

The European Financial Participation (EFP) schemes are an essential component of the EU 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. The EFP strives to involve workers in the decision-making of the companies they work for to a greater extent, whilst also helping to strengthen their skills, employability and aiming to reactivate the unemployed. Despite the numerous benefits of these schemes, overall participation remains relatively low. This proposal aims to stimulate the development of EFP schemes in Europe by actively highlighting the potential for growth and social protection they offer. In addition, this report suggests measures which could be taken at the EU level to facilitate the EFP, such as awareness campaigns, citizens’ financial education, more transparency and information, and outlining any transnational obstacles which both the Commission and Member States could work on. I voted in favour of this proposal, as there are numerous proven benefits of the EFP, and clear guidelines may incentivise an additional number of firms to develop EFP schemes.

2016/11/22

. ‒ All Members welcomed the Public Procurement Directives adopted in 2014, which aimed to encourage the widespread use of innovative public procurement to achieve smart, green, inclusive growth and to strengthen the circular economy by ensuring that all companies have access to public procurement. This proposal obligates Member States to fulfil the application of the 2014 Directives and ensure contractors and subcontractors working on these projects comply with the environmental, social and labour law provisions that apply to them. It also calls for the adoption of a European code of ethics for the various actors involved in procurement processes, referring specifically to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Therefore, I voted in favour of this proposal.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The European Commission has a long-standing commitment to implementing a definitive VAT system that is conducive with the functioning of the single market. In 2016, the Commission announced an intention to adopt a definitive VAT system for intra-Union, cross-border trade, dedicated to the creation of a robust single European VAT area. This proposal aims at improving the current VAT system of the European Union in the context of cross-border business-to-business trade between Member States and to define the principles, which will encompass a definitive VAT system. More precisely, this proposal aims to amend the VAT Directive (Directive 2006/112/EC), which is an important step forward in replacing the transitional arrangements currently in place. The motive behind the creation of this definitive VAT system is that conducting business across the EU should be as simple and as secure as conducting business on a domestic level, and therefore I voted in favour of this proposal, in order to keep the progress on the definitive VAT system moving forward.

2016/11/22

Article 199a of the VAT Directive (Directive 2006/112/EC), provides Member States with the option to use the reverse charge mechanism for payments of VAT on supplies of pre-defined goods and services, which can be prone to fraud. In addition, Article 199b offers an accelerated procedure for the introduction of the same reverse charge mechanism in cases of sudden and massive fraud. Both of these Articles expire on 31 December 2018. The Commission has recently presented two legislative proposals that are aimed at tackling cases of VAT fraud more fundamentally; however, these arrangements are not expected to enter into force until July 2022. In addition, the current measures, applied temporarily in the interim, are set to expire on 31 December 2018. This proposal suggests prolonging the temporary measures until the two new legislative proposals come into effect on 1 July 2018. As these measures are considered satisfactory temporarily, I voted in favour of this proposal.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this proposal, which involves the automation of the supervision of movements of excise goods which are released for consumption in one Member State and are moved to another for commercial purposes. Specifically, this proposal will amend the scope of Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 in order to include two new categories of economic operators: certified consignors, who are registered as consignors for excise good that have already been released for consumption, and certified consignees, who are registered as consignees for excise goods that have already been released for consumption.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal encompasses defining a support framework and procedures for cooperation on clinical assessment of health technologies at Union level and common methodologies for the clinical assessment of health technologies. The idea is that this proposed regulation will not interfere with the national competence of Member States for national pricing or reimbursement decisions. The health technology assessment and amending (HTA) Directive 2011/24/EC promotes innovations that produce the best results for patients and society in general. Cooperation between HTA authorities is based on the principles of good governance, objectivity, independence and transparency. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it will make cooperation procedures more trustworthy and increasingly streamlined.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this proposed regulation, as it aims to establish emissions performance requirements for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles, in order to achieve the Union’s climate targets and to comply with its climate commitments at an international level. This regulation would apply to alternatively fuelled vehicles with their maximum authorised mass to come above 3 500kg but not to exceed 4 250kg. I voted in favour, as there is a need to regulate the emission performance standards of all new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, in accordance with the European Union’s dedication to reducing CO2 emissions.

2016/11/22

This proposal aims to amend the VAT Directive and provide greater flexibility for Member States to benefit from reduced or zero rates in force in other Member States. It also allows Member States to apply a maximum of two reduced rates of a minimum of 5%. In addition, Member States may also apply a rate lower than the 5% minimum and an exemption with deductible VAT paid at the preceding stage. I voted in favour of this proposal as it was stressed by members that these reduced rates and exemptions will benefit the consumer, with priority given to goods and services that have a positive impact on the general interest of countries, i.e. cultural, social or environmental benefits. Member States will avoid using reduced VAT rates for harmful or luxury products.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this proposal, as, in the interests of clarity and transparency, it aims to undertake a codification concerning the third countries whose nationals must possess visas when crossing the external borders and those nationals who have an exemption from this requirement. It will also establish visa requirements and exemptions for third-country nationals entering the EU for a short stay: up to 90 days in any 180-day period. It also provides a mechanism that allows the implementation of reciprocity if one of the third countries included in this list, and whose nationals are exempt from the visa requirement, decides to place nationals from a particular Member State under a visa obligation. The European Union would respond under this mechanism by acting in solidarity.

2016/11/22

The Mediterranean Research and Innovation Partnership (PRIMA) is a public-public partnership that encourages cooperation between the research capacities of the European Union and the participating Mediterranean countries to facilitate the development of innovative solutions focused on making agri-food and water management and supply systems in the Mediterranean area more efficient, secure and sustainable. At present there are 19 countries implementing PRIMA, of which Morocco is one. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it essentially outlines the terms and conditions for Morocco’s participation in PRIMA.

2016/11/22

The proposed air transport agreement includes the gradual phasing-in of traffic rights and investment opportunities, as well as including thorough cooperation on issues such as safety, security, social matters, consumer interests, environment and air traffic management. This agreement removes any restrictions in place on routes, prices or the number of flights occurring weekly between the EU and Canada. The proposal was brought before the European Parliament, as affirmation of the agreement is needed on behalf of the Union. I voted in favour of this agreement as it is expected to generate around 3.5 million extra passengers within the first few years, which would in turn generate consumer benefits of around EUR 72 million through lower fares and the creation of new jobs.

2016/11/22

The Italian Government has requested that the municipality of Campione d’Italia and the Italian waters of Lake Lugano be included in the EU customs territory and in the territory of the Union to which the excise duty directive (Directive 2008/118/EC) applies. In addition, Italy would like these two territories to continue to be excluded from the territorial application of the VAT Directive (Directive 2006/112/EC). This is essential to guarantee that the economies of Campione d’Italia and Switzerland are on an even playing field. I voted in favour of this proposal, as it only requires a small, formal amendment of the VAT Directive, changing the two territories from Article 6(2) to Article 6(1).

2016/11/22

The Netherlands have submitted this application under the intervention criteria requiring that at least 500 workers working in the same economic sector, as defined under the NACE Revision 2 Division, are made redundant over a period of nine months. Their application outlines that from 24 March 2017 to 24 December 2017, 1 324 workers in a specific sector were made redundant, which would have a direct and significant negative effect on the local economy.The Commission has concluded that the conditions for awarding a financial contribution from the EGF are met. Therefore, the EGF will be mobilised for EUR 1 192 500, representing 60% of the total costs of the seven types of actions proposed by the Netherlands in response to this crisis. I voted in favour of this proposal, which will transfer the relevant budgetary line for the requested amount.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal presents an amendment to budget No. 5 of the general budget 2018. The amendment encompasses cancelling the reserve of support allocated to Turkey from the Instrument for Pre-Accession. The European Parliament and the Council had set aside EUR 70 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 35 million in payment appropriations for Turkey in order to encourage political reforms and related progressive alignment with the values of the European Union. However, conditions were placed on these support funds in the areas of the rule of law, democracy, human rights and freedom of the press, which have not been met. It was proposed that the reserved amounts be fully cancelled, with these funds instead being utilised to increase the budgets of the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) and Humanitarian Aid. I voted in favour of this resolution, as due to the lack of steps taken by Turkey to conform to these conditions, it would be unnecessary to continue to reserve these funds, as they could be better used in the alternatively proposed budgets.

2016/11/22

The Eurojust agency deals with judicial cooperation amongst Member States with regard to criminal matters. Eurojust may conclude agreements with third countries and organisations, once both Eurojust and the Joint Supervisory Body concerning provisions on data protection have issued consultations on the matter, and the Council itself gives approval. This resolution outlines a negotiated agreement of cooperation between Eurojust and Albania, which Eurojust shall conclude, since the Joint Supervisory Body gave a positive opinion on the content of the agreement. This agreement also directly references the exchange of personal data. Albania has already ratified the Council of Europe Convention and its Additional Protocol regarding transborder data flows; making them a more than adequate data-sharing partner. I voted in favour of this resolution as the exchange of information between third countries and the EU regarding criminal matters greatly benefits the judicial proceedings of the EU.

2016/11/22

Kosovo has illustrated its commitment to a European perspective, something that the European Parliament has recognised and become a strong advocate of. As a result, the Parliament had reiterated to the Kosovar authorities to cooperate and efficiently fulfil the required benchmarks of the visa liberation process. The Commission has helped facilitate and accelerate this process, as the visa-free regime would be an incredibly important and concrete achievement for the country’s European perspective. This resolution proposes amending Regulation (EC) 539/2001, by removing Kosovo from the visa-required list, and adding the country to the visa-free list. I voted in favour of this resolution as it actualises free movement as one of the core principles of European projects.

2016/11/22

Although plastic is plays an essential part in our societies and economies, the way plastics are produced, used and disposed of has a devastating impact on the environment. The key component to reduce the amount of damage done by plastic, is to produce and use plastics in a sustainable manner. There is an obligation on the EU to fulfil commitments made under the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive by the end of 2020, as well the plastic packaging recycling target of 55% that it has imposed. This resolution welcomes several proposed initiatives such as; plastic-free supermarket aisles, marine waste recovery programmes; clear, harmonised rules on bio-based content and biodegradability; a ban on microplastics; and the development of a global plastics protocol. I voted in favour of this resolution, as plastic waste has a significantly detrimental impact on the environment, the climate, our economy, and on our health.

2016/11/22

Prevalent excessive and incorrect uses of antibiotics and poor infection control practices in both human and veterinary medicine has exacerbated the threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) for humans and animals alike. Misusing antibiotics only succeeds in making them inefficient. This resolution called for measurable and binding AMR objectives, striving for ambitious targets, both in the European One Health Action Plan and in national action plans, to ensure benchmarking of targets. It also called for Member States to commit to a global strategy to combat AMR, covering policy areas such as international trade, development and agriculture. Countries outside the EU can still use antibiotics in animal feed, something which is banned within the EU. Therefore, there is a need for the Commission to include a clause in all trade agreements involving the importing of food from other countries stipulating that antibiotics are not used as growth promoters. I voted in favour of this resolution, as it is essential that we tackle AMR in both animals and in people, considering that the health of both are directly connected to the health of the environment.

2016/11/22

The mobility sector is a key component of both European society and the economy. New developments in this area, such as automated cars and digitalisation, have seen it undergo profound changes in the past decade. It is vital that Member States adopt measures in anticipation of these changes. This resolution recommends the development of an EU-wide strategy surrounding the digitalisation of the transport sector and the employment opportunities that this modernisation will create. This strategy will encompass research and innovation in sustainable and innovative transport technologies and mobility solutions; improve the connectivity in Member States; further transparent financial support; and invest in environmentally responsible low-carbon fuels. I voted in favour of this resolution, as it is important that more funding be allocated to research and development into and of increased connectivity, improved transport infrastructure and traffic management.

2016/11/22

Following the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, an evaluation revealed the objectives of this regulation, protecting human and animal health and the environment, have not been met. Moreover, occasionally these objectives and instruments of the Regulation are not wholly in line with EU policies, particularly in the fields of; agriculture, health, animal welfare, food, security, water quality, climate change, sustainable use of pesticides and maximum residue levels of pesticides in food and feed. This resolution urges an enhancement of the transparency of the regulatory processes in these areas, including data surrounding safety studies. There is a definite need to review the procedures of this regulation to improve evaluations, increase the independence of those carrying out these evaluations and illuminate any potential conflicts of interest. The resolution also stresses that low-risk and no-chemical pesticides need to be both authorised and championed. I voted in favour of this resolution, as the implementation of the regulation must be effective and currently some problematic aspects of the implementation have had negative impacts on public health and the environment.

2016/11/22

Research conducted across Member States have revealed that although the brand name, packaging design and marketing look the same initially, the recipes, basic ingredients or materials used can vary wildly depending on the country of purchase. Although this is predominantly a fault in food products, it also occurs with non-food products: cosmetics, toiletries and detergents. This represents a significant shortcoming of regulation in the area of dual quality of products. All consumers across Member States should enjoy the same level of product quality assurance. This resolution proposes ways to address this issue, including a commitment to delivering a common method of testing, allocating a budget for the enforcement of standards and upgrading Directive 2005/29/EC, that outlines unfair commercial practices. It also underlines the importance of a public debate, in order to raise consumer awareness of products.I voted in favour of this resolution, as assuring dual quality of products is an integral part of how the single market functions, as is ensuring consumer confidence. Therefore an EU-wide solution is necessary to enforce quality measures.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposal is an amendment to Regulation (EC) 110/2008 of the European Parliament. The current nominal quantities of prepacked products recognised under Directive 2007/45/EC do not allow for the import of Japanese shochu, a spirit drink generally produced in quantities of 720 ml or 1800 ml. The change can be introduced only by means of this regulation, as the exception must apply in all Member States simultaneously. I voted in favour in order to allow these products entry into the EU.

2016/11/22

. ‒ This proposed amendment to the Memorandum of Cooperation NAT-I-9406 between the European Union and the United States, was signed on the 13 December 2017. The amendment builds entirely on the same principles of research and development in civil aviation as the memorandum, but specifically references the development of air traffic management (ATM) modernisation and global interoperability. All phases of ATM modernisation, including deployment, are part of the natural evolution of the work carried out under the memorandum. Therefore, I voted in favour of the amendment.

2016/11/22

This resolution proposed to amend the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, as presently it does not recognise the accession of Croatia to the European Union. It also proposes that under this Agreement Member States must also provide the necessary linguistic adaptations due to Croatia’s accession. I voted in favour of this amendment, as Croatia is entitled to become a Party to the aforementioned Agreement.

2016/11/22

The foundation of the European Union are the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. It is imperative therefore, that all Member States must uphold these values. If there is a real risk that a Member State is breaching these common values, than the EU safeguards them by making use of the process under Article 7 TEU. In a resolution regarding the situation in Hungary on the 17May 2017, Parliament stated that Hungary is at risk of violating the fundamental values of the EU, with some main concerns involving corruption and conflicts of interest, freedom of religion, the right to equal treatment and the rights of persons belonging to minorities. I voted in favour of this resolution as it is now necessary for the Council to evaluate appropriate measures to restore inclusive democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights in Hungary.

2016/11/22

The use of lethal autonomous weapons no doubt raises fundamental ethical and legal questions, focusing on how well they can be controlled, as machines and robots are unable to make necessary judgement decisions, especially concerning target selection and engagement. It is vital that EU remains an actor for peace on a global level and continues to dedicate itself to all global disarmament and non-proliferation efforts. This resolution calls for the EU to adopt a common definition on autonomous weapon systems and commit to preventing the development or production of any of these weapon systems. I voted in favour of this resolution, as it is a recognisably important step in ensuring the maintenance of international peace and security, the protection of civilians and the respect for international human rights law.

2016/11/22

There is no doubt that the EU-US relationship is essential for global stability, maintaining peace and stability since WWII and allowing for the creation of a multilateral trade system. However, the current ‘America first’ policy of the Trump administration harms the interests of both the EU and the US. This resolution criticises some of the recent unilateral decisions of the US that have strained the EU-US relationship, including; President Trump’s decision to leave the JCPOA; the decision of the US government to movie its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and formally recognise the city as Israel’s capital; and the imposing of steel and aluminium tariffs. The resolution also outlines the importance of continued cooperation between the EU and the US, especially regarding NATO, the situation in Syria and improving the field of cybersecurity and cyber defence. I voted in favour of this resolution, it is imperative that what unites the EU and US continues to outweigh that which divides, and that the EU remain cohesive and unified in the face of any more unexpected unilateral decisions by the US.

2016/11/22

The EU-China Comprehensive Partnership, founded on a shared commitment to the principles of openness and cooperation, is extremely important to the EU. Yet the steady growth of the economic and political power of China has challenged this commitment somewhat. China continually and systematically attempts to translate its economic power into political influence, specifically through very strategic infrastructure investments. This resolution calls for Member States participating in the 16 + 1 format with China to ensure that they remain tethered to the ideals and values of the collective EU, carrying out sound analysis of any infrastructure projects to ensure European interests are not subverted for financial support. It also firmly condemns China’s ongoing harassment, arbitrary arrests and persecution of Chinese human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists and academics, referencing the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) in Geneva in 2017 as the EU’s first official failure to address China’s human rights record in a joint statement. I voted for this resolution as the EU must pursue a more ambitious, united and transparent policy regarding human rights in China.

2016/11/22

Under Council Decision 2003/17/EC, inspections and production of certain species of seed carried out by certain non-EU countries are equivalent to those carried out on seed harvested and controlled within the EU, as they are in accordance with EU law. Currently neither Brazil nor Moldova is among these recognised non-EU countries, and consequently their seed cannot be imported into the EU. Brazil has submitted a request that its fodder, plant and cereal seed be considered equivalent under the aforementioned Council Decision. Moldova has submitted a similar request for the equivalence of cereal, vegetable and oil and fibre plant seed produced in Moldova. Inspections by the Commission showed that the certification systems in place in these two countries are equivalent to those in the EU, and therefore I voted for both of these countries’ requests to be approved.

2016/11/22

Although Member States may exempt some small businesses from paying VAT, many small businesses continue to pay disproportionate VAT compliance costs due to the design of the current exemption. In combination with this, small businesses involved in cross-border trade are not eligible for an exemption in Member States other than the one in which they are established. Therefore, some small businesses are required to charge their customers VAT that differs from that of their own Member State. This proposal intends to amend the current VAT directive, in order to simplify and modernise the current small businesses scheme and reduce VAT compliance costs for small businesses at both EU and domestic level. This will be done by establishing an online portal, on which small businesses may register for an exemption in an alternate Member State, and through the creation of a one-stop shop, at which small enterprises may file VAT returns for all Member States in which they are operating. These measures will be introduced by 31 December 2019. I voted in favour of these amendments, which should reduce compliance costs for small businesses by 18% and increase cross-border trading activities within the EU by 13.5%.

2016/11/22

An assessment submitted to the Commission by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction in March 2018 outlined the risks that both cyclopropylfentanyl and methoxyacetylfentanyl potentially pose to the health of individuals, specifically referencing the acute toxicity of these two synthetic opioids. For example, the former has been circulating in the EU since 2017, with 77 deaths in two Member States involving exposure to the substance. The information available on the health and social risks that these substances can cause provides sufficient grounds for implementing control measures on them both, and I therefore voted in favour of the introduction of such measures.

2016/11/22

During 2017, Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland all faced a series of disasters, costing the lives of at least 16 people, as well as injuring over 150. These disasters also caused immense damage to the infrastructure of these countries, public property, areas of natural resources and important cultural heritage sites. This proposal seeks to allow the European Union Solidarity Fund to be utilised in order to assist the aforementioned countries, as is permitted under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013. I voted in favour of the proposal, which will allocate EUR 2 258 225 to Bulgaria, EUR 2 535 796 to Greece, EUR 16 918 941 to Lithuania, and EUR 12 279 244 to Poland under the EUSF for the financial year 2018.

2016/11/22

During 2017, Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania and Poland all faced a series of disasters, costing the lives of at least 16 people, as well as injuring over 150. These disasters also caused immense damage to the infrastructure of these countries, public property, areas of natural resources and important cultural heritage sites. This proposal intends to allow the European Union Solidarity Fund to be utilised in order to assist the aforementioned countries, as is permitted under Article 10 of Council Regulation No. 1311/2013. I voted in favour of this proposal, which will allocate EUR 2 258 225 to Bulgaria, EUR 2 535 796 to Greece, EUR 16 918 941 to Lithuania, and EUR 12 279 244 to Poland, under the EUSF for the financial year of 2018.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this resolution as special EU programmes in Northern Ireland (NI) and the border regions are an integral part of sustaining the peace process, as they promote cross-community cooperation and trust. NI has benefited from special cross-border programmes, namely the PEACE Programme and the Interreg V-A programme. The latter provides funding for NI, Scotland and the border counties of the Republic.In the current financial period, more than EUR 1 billion is devoted to economic and social development in NI and the border regions, with half of this spent on the aforementioned programmes. This resolution commits future funding in the Commission’s draft multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2021-2027, in order to ensure that the peace processes in NI and the border regions will continue. A UK position paper published in April 2018 outlines that the UK is willing to both continue to engage with these programmes under the current MFF, as well as explore successors to these programmes. This resolution emphasises that the reconciliation process in NI provides a positive example for post-conflict areas in the EU and that the PEACE programme could become the EU model for establishing sustainable peace by fostering trust between communities in conflict.

2016/11/22

Due to both the financial crisis and the refugee crisis having severe effects on the Greek economy, the country faced liquidity shortages and a lack of public funds vital for stimulating sustainable economic recovery and growth. It was of upmost importance that these hindrances did not affect investment in Greece. Therefore, Regulation 2015/1839 outlined provisions for European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) adopting measures specifically aimed at Greece.Funds provided by the ESI, as well as cohesion policy, are regarded as the most important sources of direct investment into Greece. I voted in favour of this resolution, as supporting public investing and deploying EU investment in a flexible way in Greece has succeeded in mitigating the impact of the financial crisis and sustained fiscal consolidation in several Member States. I also support Greece’s efforts and hope that the country continues to make use of all avenues for assistance available under the Structural Reform Support Programme.

2016/11/22

European workforces are ageing, so there is a necessity to ensure that our labour markets are more inclusive and responsive to the needs of our ageing societies, as well as preventing them from losing valuable skills due to the exclusion of older workers. This resolution presents three main ways in which the EU can provide assistance to Member States in this area.The first involves prevention and early intervention, whereby it is important for Member States to implement functioning legislation ensuring that employers provide inclusive work environments, for example by providing targeted additional benefits for people with disabilities or chronic disease.The second considers return-to-work policies as an integral part of a broader holistic approach to healthy working lives in order to counter the negative effects of long-term work absence.The third stresses that it is imperative that workers are aware of occupational rehabilitation and return-to-work policies programmes, as well as any improvements to company culture, in order to tackle any existing prejudices or discriminatory practices. I voted in favour of this report, as my Group stress the importance of campaigns fighting discrimination in the workplace, as well as the promotion of prevention and health and safety at work measures.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The financial crisis allowed for the introduction of 15 pieces of financial legislation, specifically referencing ‘third-country provisions’. These give the Commission the discretion to decide whether regulatory rules in foreign jurisdictions will be equivalent. However, no single framework has been provided as a foundation for these equivalence decisions. This resolution therefore, calls for the development of a consistent framework for ongoing supervision of equivalent third-country regimes, in order to ensure that all equivalence procedures are transparent, coherent and consistent. Decisions on equivalency will be monitored by the relevant European Supervisory Authority and their outcomes will be made available to the public. I voted in favour of this report, as I appreciate increased regulatory and supervisory cooperation between the EU and third countries, as this has greatly contributed to improvement of global consistency in financial regulation. I also recognise that the current equivalence procedures for third-country provisions could benefit greatly from increased transparency.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Border regions persistently face certain obstacles when it comes to their growth and development rates, resulting in their economic performance being comparatively lower than other regions within Member States. I voted in favour of this resolution as it targeted three specific areas in order to boost growth and cohesion in these areas. The first is to target the more persistent and prevalent obstacles with more scenario-specific approaches, that are tailor-made, integrated and place-based. There is a need here to provide small businesses in these areas with additional support, as well as focusing on the development of sustainable transport infrastructure in these regions. The second calls for more coordination and dialogue between authorities, ensuring that there is an effective exchange of information. One way this could be achieved is by using Interreg programmes, the likes of which I support in NI and the border regions of the Republic. The third is that European territorial cooperation programmes, and the budget attributed to them, should be continued, as these can be expertly exploited in order to remove obstacles to economic growth.

2016/11/22

I do not support the rapporteur in her recommendation to divert public funds to new or alternative forms of energy involving the use of nuclear technology – namely fusion energy. However, the paragraphs outlining a commitment to the safer disposal and decommissioning of nuclear power plants within Europe are agreeable. Considering the conflicting points of interest in this report, coupled with the fact that Ireland has never operated with nuclear reactors nor relied upon nuclear energy, I ultimately decided to abstain from this resolution.

2016/11/22

Women in the EU continue to be less protected against gender-based violence and sexual and psychological harassment due to legislation in this area differing across Member States. Sexual harassment at work result in many cases in the victim’s dismissal from or isolation within the workplace. I voted in favour of this resolution, as it calls for the introduction of policies which outline prevention measures, introduce confidential procedures to deal with complaints and appropriate sanctions for perpetrators. A zero-tolerance approach to sexual harassment is necessary within the workplace, with work environments also including those within the political sphere, as sexual harassment and bullying of women in politics remains a vehement issue. This resolution also references the importance of including communication technologies within the definition of a public space, as sexual harassment is increasingly occurring in ‘virtual’ public spaces, as is the case on all social networking sites.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The technology gap between well-resourced languages and their less-resourced counterparts continues to grow, putting more than 20 European languages at risk of digital language extinction. Europe currently remains lacking in language technologies, and so this resolution proposes several measures to improve language technology policies at EU level in order to promote and protect the cultural and linguistic diversity within the Union.The report recommends long-term, large-scale funding programmes directed towards research, development and innovation in the field of language technologies, including a human language technologies (HLT) financing platform.I voted in favour of the resolution as it will not only cultivate the growth and development of Gaeilge online but will also enable students and young people fluent or proficient in the language to become aware of career opportunities in language technology.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Taking action now and allowing forests to regrow by putting a stop to deforestation, would achieve at least 30% of all mitigation action needed to confine global warming to 1.5°C. This resolution proposes that the EU establish stronger cooperation and effective partnerships with countries that are timber-usage heavy, with imports of timber and timber-made products subject to more extensive checks at EU borders, to ensure their compliance with EU regulations. There is also a need for the EU to regulate the trade and consumption of commodities such as soy, palm oil and cocoa, the production of which involves an intensive risk to forests. As well as this, the EU must commit to a meaningful, EU-wide action plan on deforestation and forest degradation. I voted in favour of this resolution, as diverse forests are a vital part of sustainable development plans and an important component of the Paris Agreement.

2016/11/22

I voted to challenge this mandate, which will allow the entire Parliament to have a final say on the proposed Copyright Directive in September. This is an extremely contentious issue for both creators of copyrighted material as well as the citizens of the EU and deserves further debate and input from MEPs.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) – in line with similar models in the US, Canada and Australia – as proposed by the European Commission. My Group which is generally in favour of visa liberalisation, find the proposed new system an adequate tool to control the migration and security risks, as the ETIAS will collect information of the visa-exempt travellers to screen them before entering the EU. Europol, the Union’s law enforcement agency, will be tasked with managing a database of persons who are suspected of committing serious crime or a terrorist offence.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) – in line with similar models in the US, Canada and Australia – as proposed by the European Commission. My Group which is generally in favour of visa liberalisation, find the proposed new system an adequate tool to control the migration and security risks, as the ETIAS will collect information of the visa-exempt travellers to screen them before entering the EU. Europol, the Union’s law enforcement agency, will be tasked with managing a database of persons who are suspected of committing serious crime or a terrorist offence.

2016/11/22

To address the current limits of EU information systems, eliminate information gaps and enable information to be shared between information systems, the Commission proposed to strengthen the mandate of EU-LISA, enabling it to develop and rollout the technical solutions to make the EU information systems interoperable. The proposal would also strengthen the management of new systems to ensure that its mandate meets the current challenges in the area of migration and security on the European level. I voted in favour of the report, which will strengthen the functioning of EU-LISA, enhance, and strengthen its role to ensure that its mandate meets current challenges at EU level in the area of freedom, security and justice.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this resolution which points out the inadequacy of the protection afforded by the EU-US Privacy Shield. Via this arrangement, the European Commission authorises the transfer of personal data to a third country, if that country guarantees an adequate level of protection. In October 2017 the Commission presented the first annual review of the functioning of the Privacy Shield framework, identifying several shortcomings. Today, nearly two years after the adoption of the mechanism, serious concerns remain about the lack of compliance by the US authorities. The current arrangements do not provide the adequate level of protection required by Union data protection law (GDPR) and data transfer by companies from Europe to the US should be suspended until the US fully complies with the rules.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this resolution on the extraterritorial impact of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) – an American law requiring foreign banks and financial institutions to report to the American tax authorities on customers who are ‘US Persons’, i.e. US citizens or people with ties to the US, or pay a 30% withholding tax. Due to this law, many ‘accidental Americans’, who, by accident of birth, inherited US citizenship, but who do not maintain any ties to the US and are EU citizens, face problems with banks or financial institutions. Banks, for example, are refusing US citizens as customers, so these EU citizens no longer have access to financial services like a basic bank account, mortgage loans or credit for their business. Denouncing US citizenship is expensive and cumbersome. EU Member States are facilitating FATCA by transferring the personal data of US persons to the US tax authorities. This resolution calls on the Commission to put citizens’ rights before diplomatic relations, and demand that the US find a solution ending the predicament of US citizens in Europe and to ensure that in Europe no one is excluded from essential financial services on the basis of their nationality.

2016/11/22

. ‒ Through the Structural Reform Support Programme, put in place in 2017, the EU helps and strengthens the capacity of Member States to prepare and implement growth-enhancing administrative and structural reforms, contributing therefore to the achievement of common goals of supporting economic recovery, cohesion and job creation, boosting Europe’s competitiveness and productivity, and stimulating investment in the real economy. I voted in favour of the Commission’s proposal to increase the financial allocation of the SRSP by EUR 80 million to EUR 222.8 million for 2019-2020.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report reforming the EU electoral law to encourage citizens’ participation, to reinforce the European dimension of elections, to make Parliament’s own functioning more efficient, and to improve the conduct of elections. With the new rules, citizens will finally be more aware of the link between the national parties and candidates running in the elections and their affiliation with a European political party. European issues can gradually replace national ones in the debate on European elections. European elections will also become more accessible, with the possibility to introduce electronic and postal voting. This would mean that electoral turnout would increase.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) was negotiated during the years 2015-2017 following the decision by Armenia in 2013 not to sign the negotiated Association Agreement (AA) and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with the European Union (EU), but to join instead the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) on 2 January 2015. In signing CEPA, it should be appreciated from several aspects. Firstly, it shows the interest and commitment of Armenia to have closer ties with the EU to the extent that is compatible with its obligations under the EEU. Secondly, it represents the flexibility of the EU in line with the new differentiated approach under the European neighbourhood policy to negotiate a tailor-made agreement for Armenia compatible with the EEU. I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ CEPA was negotiated during the years 2015-2017 following the decision by Armenia in 2013 not to sign the negotiated Association Agreement (AA) and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with the European Union (EU), but to join instead the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) on 2 January 2015. In signing CEPA, it should be appreciated from several aspects. Firstly, it shows the interest and commitment of Armenia to have closer ties with the EU to the extent that is compatible with its obligations under the EEU. Secondly, it represents the flexibility of the EU in line with the new differentiated approach under the European neighbourhood policy to negotiate a tailor-made agreement for Armenia compatible with the EEU. I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report on the conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the EU and Iraq. The report stresses that the PCA is an essential instrument for implementing the EU strategy for Iraq and for strengthening the EU’s cooperation in the country’s reconstruction, stabilisation and reconciliation at national and local level with a long-term strategy. Furthermore, it emphasises the importance of Iraqi ownership in the process of building a democratic, federal and pluralist state based on respect for human rights and rule of law.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report on the conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the EU and Iraq. The report stresses that the PCA is an essential instrument for implementing the EU strategy for Iraq and for strengthening the EU’s cooperation in the country’s reconstruction, stabilisation and reconciliation at national and local level with a long-term strategy. Furthermore, it emphasises the importance of Iraqi ownership in the process of building a democratic, federal and pluralist state based on respect for human rights and rule of law.

2016/11/22

. ‒ The current agreement between the EU and New Zealand was negotiated following the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union. Under WTO rules, the EU has to enter into negotiations with WTO members having negotiating rights related to the tariff schedule of Croatia in order to eventually agree on a compensatory adjustment. Such adjustment is due if the adoption of the EU’s external tariff regime results in an increase in tariff beyond the level for which the acceding country has bound itself at the WTO. This was the case for trade between Croatia and New Zealand, in particular in relation to imports of certain meats, where EU tariffs are higher than the tariffs established by Croatia before its accession. The compensation negotiated aims to be proportional for the products affected. I voted in favour of this report.

2016/11/22

. ‒ I voted in favour of this report. In the 2015 Case T 496/11, UK vs ECB, the European Court ruled that the wording of Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, which granted the ECB regulatory powers over ‘clearing and payment systems’, was not to be construed as granting the ECB regulatory powers over CCPs. The amendment proposed last 22 June 2017 by the ECB aims to modify the Statute in order to bring ‘clearing systems for financial instruments’, in other words, CCPs, within the scope of the regulatory powers conferred by Article 22 of the Statute. This would allow the Eurosystem to take up the powers that will be granted to it as central bank of issue of the euro under the Commission proposal amending EMIR as regards the supervision of CCPs, issued last 13 June 2017. This is an important step towards the creation of an effective system for the supervision of CCPs in the European Union, which would include an appropriate role for the central banks of issue of the currencies cleared by the respective CCPs.

2016/11/22

Distance-based road pricing can play a key role in incentivising cleaner transport operations in a fair and equitable manner. However, when it comes to the introduction of such a measure, the proposal should take into account specific national circumstances and extend flexibility to its adoption and implementation to the member state in question. I voted in favour of this report. Specific National circumstances need to be flexible for the reduction of vehicle taxation. Where distance based road charging is being introduced, it is essential to also reduce the rate of vehicle taxation on HGVs while maintaining consideration of the potential for added financial burdens on the transport industry and in particular SMEs.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report. I support the opinion that it is important to tackle the multiple causes of child, early and forced marriages, including harmful traditions, endemic poverty, conflicts, customs, the lack of appropriate educational opportunities, weak legal and policy responses with special attention to children from disadvantaged communities. Furthermore, the report highlights that a statutory ban on child, early and forced marriages by itself would not guarantee an end to these practices. The EU and its Member States need to better coordinate and strengthen the enforcement of international treaties, legislation and programmes, as well as via diplomatic relations with governments and organisations in third countries.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report that argues that the EU must ensure that the deepening of relations between the EU and Azerbaijan is conditional on that country upholding and respecting the core values and principles of democracy. Azerbaijan must also respect the rule of law, good governance, human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression and association, the rights of minorities, and gender equality, in the interest of both parties and, in particular, their citizens.

2016/11/22

Parliament had an opportunity to adopt a position on transport legislation that would have helped to protect the haulage industry, those who work in it and the very many exporters who rely on it in Ireland. Unfortunately, this did not happen and we now face the real prospect of a very damaging position on the cross—border road haulage sector as this file returns to the Committee on Transport and Tourism. In Ireland, there are 3 500 registered road hauliers and the typical haulage business has 4 trucks in operation. Some 50 000 jobs depend directly or indirectly on the road haulage sector. Road hauliers transport well over 80% of Irish exports to the continent and a crucial element in our attractiveness for foreign direct investment is that we can guarantee exports to mainland EU in a timely and cost—effective manner. This vote is at best a threat to our ability to access EU markets and no effort must be spared in the coming month to ensure a positive outcome for the Irish road haulage sector.

2016/11/22

Parliament had an opportunity to adopt a position on transport legislation that would have helped to protect the haulage industry, those who work in it and the very many exporters who rely on it in Ireland. Unfortunately, this did not happen and we now face the real prospect of a very damaging position on the cross—border road haulage sector as this file returns to the Committee on Transport and Tourism. In Ireland, there are 3 500 registered road hauliers and the typical haulage business has 4 trucks in operation. Some 50 000 jobs depend directly or indirectly on the road haulage sector. Road hauliers transport well over 80% of Irish exports to the continent and a crucial element in our attractiveness for foreign direct investment is that we can guarantee exports to mainland EU in a timely and cost—effective manner. This vote is at best a threat to our ability to access EU markets and no effort must be spared in the coming month to ensure a positive outcome for the Irish road haulage sector.

2016/11/22

Parliament had an opportunity to adopt a position on transport legislation that would have helped to protect the haulage industry, those who work in it and the very many exporters who rely on it in Ireland. Unfortunately, this did not happen and we now face the real prospect of a very damaging position on the cross-border road haulage sector as this file returns to the Transport Committee. In Ireland, there are 3 500 registered road hauliers and the typical haulage business has 4 trucks in operation. Some 50 000 jobs depend directly or indirectly on the road haulage sector. Road hauliers transport well over 80% of Irish exports to the continent and a crucial element in our attractiveness for foreign direct investment is that we can guarantee exports to mainland EU in a timely and cost effective manner. This vote is at best a threat to our ability to access EU markets and no effort must be spared in the coming month to ensure a positive outcome for the Irish road haulage sector.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report and I support the opening of negotiations for an agreement on the exchange of personal data for fighting serious crime and terrorism.

2016/11/22

I voted in favour of this report and I support the opening of negotiations for an agreement on the exchange of personal data for the purposes of fighting serious crime and terrorism.

2016/11/22