BETA

11 Amendments of Gunnar HÖKMARK related to 2010/2074(INI)

Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas, well-functioning and dynamic European financial markets are a precondition for an innovative and competitive European economy,
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, there will be no European recovery, new jobs and investments if European financial markets are not able to increase lending to the private sector,
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, the main problems of the European banking sector was not lack of solvency but the lack of liquidity, confidence combined with falling asset prices,
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas, the present framework of rules contributed to falling asset prices due to their procyclical nature,
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines that a recovery of the European economy requires dynamic financial markets, able to finance investments and innovations, warns against rules, and requirement that would create a new credit crunch, destabilising the economical development and European labour markets;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Is concerned about the pro-cyclical nature of a fixed bank-specific capital conservation buffer, notes that present capital requirement rules are designed in a way that contributed to systemic risks during the crisis;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Underlines the need for future rules to be truly risk based and being designed in a way that awards procyclical behaviour;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Notes the concept of a ‘crude’ LR as a possible backstop against building excessive leverage, but can find no evidence of a LR that has prevented excess leverage in other jurisdictions, and has strong concerns about its added value;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Is, however, concerned that a crude LR maywould not sufficiently take risk into account and would penalise entities providing traditional low -risk banking services (such as corporate and real-estate financing) or economies where the corporate sector is financed predominantly through lending;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Urges the Commission to ensure that a leverage ratio does not lead to excessive securitisation, which played an important role in provoking the financial crisis, and less credit (these being likely ways for banks to reduce their leverage ratio);
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Reminds the Commission that decreased lending would reduce growth and could create new risks and undermine the stability of European economies;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON