BETA

3 Amendments of Christofer FJELLNER related to 2010/2143(DEC)

Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69 a (new)
69a. Believes the Parliament, as a public institution, is not competent to judge the artistic merit of film productions; insists the LUX prize be discontinued in 2011;
2011/02/22
Committee: CONT
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69 b (new)
69b. Notes that the direct costs of the LUX prize amount to in excess of EUR 300 000 and that indirect costs (travel to film festivals, promotion etc) may well mean the prize costs much more; notes that after four years of operation fewer than one third of Members actually participate in the vote; further notes that voting participation varies dramatically across national delegations but appears to be significantly higher amongst Members from countries with a film on the shortlist;
2011/02/22
Committee: CONT
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69 c (new)
69c. Opposes attempts to expand the prize by organising events in the member states which would imply substantially increased costs relating to publicity and promotion, venues and translation;
2011/02/22
Committee: CONT