BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

69 Amendments of Åsa WESTLUND related to 2011/0281(COD)

Amendment 14 #
Ska KELLER, Norbert NEUSER, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 94
(94) A single market involves a trading system at the external borders of the Union. That trading system should include import duties and should continue to include, for a limited period, export refunds and should, in principle, stabilise the Union market. The trading system should be based on the undertakings accepted under the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and in bilateral agreements, and take into account the Union's development objectives and commitments towards developing countries as well as the commitment of the 2005 WTO ministerial declaration of eliminating all forms of export subsidies until 2013.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #
Ska KELLER, Norbert NEUSER, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 107
(107) Provisions for granting refunds on exports to third countries, based on the difference between prices within the Union and on the world market, and falling within the limits set by the commitments made within the WTO, should serve to safeguard the Union's participation in international trade in certain products falling within this Regulation. Subsidised exports should be subject to limits in terms of value and quantity and should not jeopardise the food production capacity and long-term food security of developing countries. Export refunds should be phased out by 2013 according to the commitment of the 2005 WTO ministerial declaration.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Norbert NEUSER
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 136 a (new)
(136a) In order to ensure policy coherence for development, no export refunds shall be granted for exports to developing countries. Until the phasing- out effectively takes place, the Union should not use export subsidies for exports to LDC or ACP countries.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #
Ska KELLER, Norbert NEUSER, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – article 157 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For the purposes of applying this Regulation, monitoring, analysing and managing the market in agricultural products, ensuring market transparency, the proper functioning of CAP measures, of checking, controlling, monitoring, evaluating and auditing CAP measures, implementing international agreements and policy coherence for development, including notification requirements under those agreements, the Commission may in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 2 adopt the necessary measures regarding communications to be made by undertakings, Member States and/or third countries. In so doing it shall take into account the data needs and synergies between potential data sources, also taking into account data from third countries.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #
Ska KELLER, Norbert NEUSER, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – article 159 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) the food facility in case of high food prices at global level and a risk of famine in developing countries.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #
Ska KELLER, Norbert NEUSER, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – article 165 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Articles 133 to 141 shall apply until 31 December 2013.
2012/05/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 435 #
Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Phil PRENDERGAST
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) The implementation of this regulation should be consistent with the development cooperation objectives of the Union's Policy Framework for Food Security (COM (2010) 127) with specific regards to ensure that the deployment of CAP measures do not jeopardize the food production capacity and long term food security developing countries and the ability of those populations to feed themselves, while complying with the obligation of Policy Coherence for Development under Article 208 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 438 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ‘The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’11 sets out potential challenges, objectives and orientations for the Common agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2013. In the light of the debate on that Communication, the CAP should be reformed with effect from 1 January 2014. That reform should cover all the main instruments of the CAP, including Council Regulation (EU) No [COM(2010)799] of […...] establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)12 . In view of the scope of the reform, it is appropriate to repeal Regulation (EU) No [COM(2010)799] and to replace it with a new Single CMO Regulation. The reform should also, as far as possible, harmonise, streamline and simplify the provisions, particularly those covering more than one agricultural sector, including by ensuring that non-essential elements of measures may be adopted by the Commission by way of delegated acts. Moreover, the reform shall continue the direction of previous reforms towards greater competitiveness and market orientation.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 528 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 94
(94) A single market involves a trading system at the external borders of the Union. That trading system should include import duties and export refunds and should, in principle, stabilise the Union market. The trading system should be based on the undertakings accepted under the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and in bilateral agreements.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 535 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 106 a (new)
(106 a) The Union will no longer use export subsidies for agricultural products and shall continue to coordinate efforts with the world's major agriculture producers to cut trade distortion subsidies. New Common Agricultural Policy shall be aligned with the EU concept of policy coherence for development in order to achieve a reasonable level of food independence in developing countries,
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 538 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 107
(107) Provisions for granting refunds on exports to third countries, based on the difference between prices within the Union and on the world market, and falling within the limits set by the commitments made within the WTO, should serve to safeguard the Union's participation in international trade in certain products falling within this Regulation. Subsidised exports should be subject to limits in terms of value and quantity.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 547 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 108
(108) Compliance with the limits in terms of value should be ensured at the time when the export refunds are fixed through the monitoring of payments under the rules relating to the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund. Monitoring can be facilitated by the compulsory advance fixing of export refunds, while allowing the possibility, in the case of differentiated refunds, of changing the specified destination within a geographical area to which a single export refund rate applies. In the case of a change of destination, the export refund applicable to the actual destination should be paid, with a ceiling on the amount applicable to the destination fixed in advance.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 551 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 109
(109) Compliance with the quantity limits should be ensured by a reliable and effective system of monitoring. To that end, the granting of export refunds should be made subject to an export licence. Export refunds should be granted up to the limits available, depending on the particular situation of each product concerned. Exceptions to that rule should be permitted only for processed products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty, to which volume limits do not apply. Provision should be made for a derogation from strict compliance with management rules where exports benefiting from export refunds are not likely to exceed the quantity laid down.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 554 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 110
(110) In the case of the export of live bovine animals, provision should be made whereby export refunds are granted and paid only if the provisions established in Union legislation concerning animal welfare, in particular those concerning the protection of animals during transport, are respecdeleted.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 557 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 111
(111) In order to ensure equality of access to export refunds for exporters of agricultural products covered by this Regulation, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of applying certain rules for agricultural products to products exported in the form of processed goods.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 559 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 112
(112) In order to encourage exporters to respect animal welfare conditions and to enable the competent authorities to verify correct expenditure of export refunds where this is conditional on respect for animal welfare requirements, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of animal welfare requirements outside the customs territory of the Union, including the use of independent third parties.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 563 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 113
(113) In order to ensure that operators respect their obligations when participating in tendering procedures, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of designating the primary requirement for release of licence securities for tendered export refunds.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 566 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 114
(114) In order to minimise the administrative burden for operators and authorities, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of acts to set thresholds below which the obligation to issue or present an export licence may not be required, designate destinations or operations where an exemption for the obligation to present an export licence can be justified and permit in justified situation export licences to be granted ex- post.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 569 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 115
(115) In order to adhere to practical situations justifying full or partial eligibility to export refunds, and in order to help operators bridge the period between the application for and the final payment of the export refund, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures pertaining to: another date for the refund; the consequences for the payment of the export refund when the product code or destination mentioned in a licence is not in conformity with the actual product or destination; advance payment of export refunds including the conditions for the lodging and release of a security; checks and proof when doubts on the real destination of products exist including the opportunity for re- importation into the customs territory of the Union; destinations treated as exports from the Union, and inclusion of destinations within the customs territory of the Union eligible for export refunds.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 572 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 116
(116) In order to ensure that products benefiting from export refunds are exported from the customs territory of the Union and to avoid their return to that territory, and in order to minimise the administrative burden for operators in generating and submitting proof that refund products reached a country of destination for differentiated refunds, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures pertaining to: the time limit by which the exit from the customs territory of the Union must be finalised, including the time for temporary re-entry; the processing that products benefiting from export refunds may undergo during that period; the proof of having reached a destination for differentiated refunds; the refund thresholds and conditions under which exporters may be exempted from such proof; and conditions for approval of proof of reaching a destination for differentiated refunds by independent third parties.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 576 #
Ulrike RODUST, Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND, Karin KADENBACH, Christel SCHALDEMOSE
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 117
(117) In order to take account of the specificities of the different sectors, the power to adopt certain acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specific requirements and conditions for operators and of the products eligible for an export refund including, in particular, the definition and characteristics of the products, and the establishment of coefficients for the purposes of calculating export refunds.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 606 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point x
(x) other products, Part XXIV of Annex I.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 660 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG, Brian SIMPSON
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) fresh or chilled meat of the beef and veal sector falling within CN codes 0201 10 00 and 0201 20 20 to 0201 20 50;deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 667 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG, Brian SIMPSON
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) butter produced directly and exclusively from pasteurised cream obtained directly and exclusively from cow's milk in an approved undertaking in the Union of a minimum butterfat content, by weight, of 82 % and a maximum water content, by weight, of 16%;deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 668 #
Anna HEDH, Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG, Brian SIMPSON
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) skimmed milk powder of top quality made from cow's milk in an approved undertaking in the Union by the spray process, with a minimum protein-content of 34,0 % by weight of the fat free dry matter.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 691 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall, by means of implementing acts, close public intervention for the beef and veal sector, where, over a representative period adopted pursuant to Article 19(a), the conditions provided for in point (c) of paragraph 1 are no longer fulfilled.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 694 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – title
Buying-in at a fixed price or tTendering
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 696 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Where public intervention is open pursuant to point (a) of Article 12(1), buying-in shall be carried out at a fixed price within the following limits for each period referred to in Article 11: (a) for common wheat, 3 million tonnes; (b) for butter, 30 000 tonnes; (c) for skimmed milk powder, 109 000 tonnes.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 703 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Where public intervention is open pursuant to Article 12(1), buying-in shall be carried out by way of a tendering procedure to determine the maximum buying-in price:.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 704 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) for common wheat, butter and skimmed milk powder beyond the limits referred to in paragraph 1,deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 706 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) for barley, maize, paddy rice and beef and veal.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 710 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In special and duly justified circumstances, the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, restrict tendering procedures to a Member State or region of a Member State, or, subject to Article 14(2), determine the buying-in prices for public intervention per Member State or region of a Member State on the basis of recorded average market prices. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2).
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 712 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Public intervention price shall mean: the maximum price at which products eligible for public intervention may be bought-in by tendering.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 713 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the price at which products shall be bought-in under public intervention where this is done at a fixed price, ordeleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 715 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the maximum price at which products eligible for public intervention may be bought-in where this is done by tendering.deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 717 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for common wheat, barley, maize, paddy rice and skimmed milk powder shall be equal to the respective reference prices fixed in Article 7 in the case of buying-in at a fixed price and shall not exceed the respective reference prices in the case of buying-in by tendering;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 722 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for butter shall be equal to 90 % of the reference price fixed in Article 7 in the case of buying-in at a fixed price and shall not exceed 90 % of the reference price in the case of buying-in by tenderingnot exceed 90 % of the reference price;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 732 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Products may be disposed of by making them available for the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union set out in Regulation (EU) No […] if that scheme so provides. In that case, the accounting value of such products shall be at the level of the relevant fixed public intervention price referred to in Article 14(2).deleted
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 760 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) flax fibre;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 795 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) skimmed milk powder made from cow's milk;deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 875 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the conditions for the sale or disposal of products bought-in under public intervention, in particular, regarding selling prices, the conditions for removal from storage, the subsequent use or destination of products released, including procedures relating to products made available for use in the scheme for food distribution to the most deprived in the Union, including transfers between Member States;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 879 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) the rules relating to the procedures to be followed for buying-in at a fixed price or for granting the aid for private storage at a fixed price;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 934 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Marita ULVSKOG, Göran FÄRM
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Member States, at national or regional level, wishing to participate in the scheme shall draw up a prior strategy for its implementation.deleted
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1710 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) improving knowledge and the transparency of production and the market, including by publication ofpublication of market studies and statistical data on the prices, volumes and duration of contracts which have been previously concluded, and volumes and by providing analyses of potential future market developments at regional or national level;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1715 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) helping to better coordinate the way the products areion of placeding on the market, in particular by means of research and market studiesfor instance by;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1720 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) exploiting to a fuller extent the potential of the products;deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1723 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) providing the information and carrying out the research necessary to rationalise, improve and adjust production towards products more suited to market requirements and consumer tastes and expectations, in particular with regard to product quality, including the particular characteristics of products with a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication, and protection of the environment;deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1725 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point vi
(vi) seeking ways of restricting the use of animal-health or plant protection products and other inputs and ensuring product quality and soil and water conservation;deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1728 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point vii
(vii) developing methods and instruments for improving product quality at all stages of production and marketing;deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1731 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ix
(ix) promoting and carrying out research into integrated, sustainable production or other environmentally sound production methods;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1734 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point x
(x) encouraging healthy consumption of the products and informing about the harm linked to hazardous consumption patterns;deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1742 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point c – point xi
(xi) carrying out promotion actions, especially in third countries.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1769 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Göran FÄRM, Marita ULVSKOG
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 2
2. For interbranch organisations in the olive oil and table olive and tobacco sectors, the specific aim referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1 may also include at least one of the following objectives: (a) concentrating and co-ordinating supply and marketing of the produce of the members; (b) adapting production and processing jointly to the requirements of the market and improving the product; (c) promoting the rationalisation and improvement of production and processing.deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1831 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 112
Measures to facilitate the adjustment of supply to market requirements Taking into account the need to encourage action by the organisations referred to in Articles 106 to 108 to facilitate the adjustment of supply to market requirements, with the exception of action relating to withdrawal from the market, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160, concerning the live plants, beef and veal, pigmeat, sheepmeat and goatmeat, eggs and poultrymeat sectors on measures: (a) to improve quality; (b) to promote better organisation of production, processing and marketing; (c) to facilitate the recording of market price trends; (d) to permit the establishment of short and long-term forecasts on the basis of the means of production used.12 deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1842 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 113
Marketing rules to improve and stabilise the operation of the common market in In order to improve and stabilise the operation of the common market in wines, including the grapes, musts and wines from which they derive, producer Member States may lay down marketing rules to regulate supply, particularly by way of decisions taken by the interbranch organisations recognised under Article 108. Such rules shall be proportionate to the objective pursued and shall not: (a) relate to any transaction after the first marketing of the produce concerned; (b) allow for price fixing, including where prices are set for guidance or recommendation; (c) render unavailable an excessive proportion of the vintage that would otherwise be available; (d) provide scope for refusing to issue the national and Union certificates required for the circulation and marketing of wines where such marketing is in accordance with those rules.Article 113 deleted wines
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1938 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 133
[...]deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1950 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 134
The quantities which may be exported with an export refund shall be allocated (a) is most suited to the nature of the product and the situation on the relevant market, allowing the most efficient use of the resources available, taking into account the efficiency and structure of Union exports and their impact on the market balance without creating discrimination between the operators concerned and in particular between large and small operators; (b) is least cumbersome administratively for operators, taking into account the administrative requirements.Article 134 deleted Export refund distribution by the method which:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1955 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 135
1. The same export refunds shall apply to the same products in the whole Union. They may vary according to destination, especially where the world market situation, the specific requirements of certain markets, or obligations resulting from agreements concluded in accordance with Article 218 of the Treaty make this necessary. 2. Measures on the fixing of refunds shall be taken by the Council in accordance with Article 43(3) of the Treaty.Article 135 deleted Export refund fixation
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1962 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 136
[...]deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1966 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 137
1. With regard to products of the beef and veal sector, the granting and the payment of the refund for exports of live animals shall be subject to compliance with the animal welfare requirements established in the Union legislation and, in particular, the protection of animals during transport. 2. Taking into account the need to encourage exporters to respect animal welfare conditions and to enable the competent authorities to verify correct expenditure of export refunds where that is conditional on respect for animal welfare requirements, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 on the respect of animal welfare requirements outside the customs territory of the Union, including the use of independent third parties. 3. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt necessary measures for the application of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2).Article 137 deleted Export refunds for live animals in the beef and veal sector
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1979 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 138
The volume commitments resulting from the agreements concluded in accordance with Article 218 of the Treaty shall be respected on the basis of export licences issued for the reference periods applying to the products concerned. The Commission may adopt implementing acts necessary to respect the volume commitments, including ceasing or limiting the issue of export licences when such commitments are or can be exceeded. With regard to compliance with the obligations under the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, the ending of a reference period shall not affect the validity of export licences.Article 138 deleted Export limits
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1984 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 139
[...]deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1990 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 140
Implementing powers in accordance with The Commission shall by means of implementing acts, adopt necessary measures for the application of this Section, in particular: (a) on the redistribution of exportable quantities which have not been allocated or utilised; (b) on products referred to in point (b) of Article 133(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2).Article 140 deleted the examination procedure
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1995 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 141
Other implementing powers The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, fix coefficients adjusting export refunds in accordance with the rules adopted pursuant to Article 139(6).Article 141 deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2054 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Marita ULVSKOG, Göran FÄRM, Brian SIMPSON
Proposal for a regulation
Article 154 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Taking into account the need to react efficiently and effectively against threats of market disturbance caused by significant price rises or falls on internal or external markets or any other factors affecting the market, where that situation is likely to continue or to deteriorate, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 to take the necessary measures for the sector concerned, respecting any obligations resulting from agreements concluded in accordance with Article 218 of the Treaty and provided that any other measures available under this Regulation appear insufficient.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2085 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Marita ULVSKOG, Göran FÄRM
Proposal for a regulation
Article 155 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The measures provided for in point (b) of paragraph 1 related to a loss in consumer confidence due to public or plant health risks shall also apply to all other agricultural products except those listed in Section 2 of Part XXIV of Annex Ieggs and poultrymeat.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2098 #
Åsa WESTLUND, Marita ULVSKOG, Göran FÄRM
Proposal for a regulation
Article 156 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt necessary and justifiable emergency measures to resolve specific problems. Those measures may apply to all other agricultural products except those listed in Section 2 of Part XXIV of Annex I. Those measures may derogate from the provisions of this Regulation only to an extent that is strictly necessary and for a period that is strictly necessary. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2).
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2141 #
Ulrike RODUST, Åsa WESTLUND, Brian SIMPSON, Christel SCHALDEMOSE, Karin KADENBACH
Proposal for a regulation
Article 159 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) Chapter VI of Part III, andeleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2146 #
Brian SIMPSON, Åsa WESTLUND
Proposal for a regulation
Article 159 – paragraph 3
The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, and by way of derogation from the second paragraph of this Article, decide that transfers of funds shall not be made for certain expenditure referred to in point (b) of that paragraph if such expenditure is part of normal market management. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2).deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation