11 Amendments of Hélène GOUDIN
Amendment 2 #
2008/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ca (new)
Recital Ca (new)
Ca. whereas, moreover, in many EU Member States these birds have caused proven permanent damage to vegetation in certain geographical areas,
Amendment 6 #
2008/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Proposes that, by means of systematic monitoring of cormorant populations supported byin the EU and the Member States, a reliable, generally recognised and annually updated database be drawn up on the development, size and geographical distribution of cormorant populations in Europe;
Amendment 19 #
2008/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, by promoting regular scientific researchin an appropriate manner, to provide reliable and generally recognised data on the total size and structure of cormorant populations in Europe, as well as their fertility and mortality parameters;
Amendment 20 #
2008/2177(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make some of the funds earmarked in the EU budget for data collection in the fisheries sector, in particular under heading 11 07 02: ‘Support for the management of fishery resources (improvement of scientific advice)’, available for investigations, analyses and forecasts of the cormorant population in the territory of the European Union, in preparation for the future regular monitoring of these species;
Amendment 170 #
2008/0216(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47
Article 47
Amendment 103 #
2008/0160(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to seal products originating from states with a permanent seal population, under the condition that: - the hunt is conducted according to a national management plan, - the hunt is selective and conducted under controlled circumstances and on a small scale basis, and - the hunt does not jeopardise the maintenance of a favourable conservation status.
Amendment 114 #
2008/0160(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
5. The Commission shall adopt all measures necessary to implement this Article, such as measures on the applications to be submitted to the Commission, including evidentiary requirements, in order to obtain a derogation. In doing so, the Commission shall take into consideration the different conditions which may occur in the territories of different countries, as well as the need to ensure that animal welfare benefits already achieved are not undermined. Derogations shall be assessed specifically in view of the principle of sustainable use in accordance with the Convention on Biological Diversity and may not lead to unreasonable or disproportionate costs or other requirements.
Amendment 143 #
2008/0160(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 5
Annex II – point 5
Requirements are specified as to secure that the seal and/or the hunter is sufficiently stable and that the target can be properly visualised. Other factors, relevant for the hunt in question, are also regulated.
Amendment 144 #
2008/0160(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 8
Annex II – point 8
Third party monitoringobservations of the hunt is possible, with a minimum of administrative or logistic barriers. However, third party observations must not imply any additional disturbance to the hunt or be of any threat to the security of the hunter.
Amendment 4 #
2008/0093(CNS)
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 5 #
2008/0093(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 - paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3 - paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. European vessels which benefit from the agreement shall pay the full cost of the agreement. The vessels' payments shall be in proportion to the respective catch.