BETA

7 Amendments of Françoise CASTEX related to 2010/2311(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets that the opportunity was missed to explain how certain EU counter- terrorism instruments such as data retention, PNR and the Swift Agreement fit into the EU counter- terrorism strategy;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers the decision to deepen and develop the four main strands of the counter-terrorism strategy – prevent, protect, pursue and respond – to be a good one; wonders at the same time whether different kinds of terrorism such as organised terrorism and "lone wolves" would not need specific approaches;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is aware that all measures that lead to prosecution may at the same be preventive measures and is therefore concerned by the delay in implementing Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and calls on the Commission to assess the implementation of Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA whose final date for transposition was 9 December 2010; considers it crucial that the Member States transpose and implement effectively counter-terrorism legisl. Emphasises nevertheless that preventive measures, in particular those that aim to prevent radicalisation and recruitment, need to go beyond this and promote dialogue and social inclusion, rather than stigmatization, adopted at Union levelnd may seek cooperation with social and civil society projects both within EU Member States and abroad;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that terrorism is a phenomenon that is constantly evolving and should be met by a counter-terrorism policy that can address this fact; welcomes in this respect the measures adopted recently in the field of aviation safety, both on checking cargo and on passenger screening systems. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the processing of passenger name records both within the EU and in third countries complies with EU data protection law and that the introduction of body scanners respects individual rights and do not cause any harm to health;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls Parliament’s important role in preventing and combating terrorism and related activities, such as the financing of terrorism; urges the Commission to introduce, as soon as possible,would welcome the introduction of administrative measures in respect of the freezing of assets to prevent and combat terrorism and related activities; urges the Commission to clarify the role of certain counter-terrorism instruments (data retention, PNR, EU-US TFTP Agreement);
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to disclose where the cooperation with third countries does not comply with the acquis and why there is a need to go beyond;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Council to quickly implement arrangements for the solidarity clause introduced by the Lisbon Treaty;
2011/03/28
Committee: JURI