BETA

3 Amendments of Dan JØRGENSEN related to 2008/0035(COD)

Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – indents 1 - 3
-i) they have been evaluated and found safe for use by the SCCP in cosmetic products in particular in view of exposure; -in particular in view of the global exposure from other sources as well as taking particular account of vulnerable group and professionals; ii) They have been in use for an extended period as ingredients in cosmetic products without safety concerns in regard to their carcinogenic, mutagenic or reproduction toxic properties; iii) The effect is considered to have a threshold and the Margin of Safety (MoS) for these substances is at least 1000 as documented in the safety assessment referred to in Article 7; iv) they are complying with the food safety requirements as defined in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety; -v) there are no suitable alternative substances available, as documented in an analysis of alternatives.
2008/09/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When Community or internationally agreed criteria for identifying substances with endocrine disrupting properties are available, or at the latest 5 years after this regulation has entered into force, the Commission shall review the regulation with regard to substances with endocrine disrupting properties.
2008/09/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12a Substances with pronounced skin sensitising properties 1. For substances categorised as extreme sensitisers by the SCCP, the Commission shall at the latest 2 years after this Regulation has entered into force put forward a proposal that their use in cosmetic products shall be prohibited. Hereafter, the Commission shall at the latest six months after publication of an opinion by the SCCP that categorises a substance as an extreme sensitiser put forward a proposal that its use in cosmetic products shall be prohibited. 2. For substances categorised as strong sensitisers by the SCCP, the Commission shall at the latest 5 years after this Regulation has entered into force put forward a proposal that their use in cosmetic products shall be prohibited. Hereafter, the Commission shall at the latest six months after publication of an opinion by the SCCP that categorise a substance as a strong sensitiser put forward a proposal that its use in cosmetic products shall be prohibited. 3. The Commission may propose a restriction instead of a ban of the substances referred to in paragraph (1) and (2) if both the following conditions are fulfilled: i. The substances have been evaluated and found safe by the SCCP in particular in view of exposure; ii. There are no suitable alternative substances available as documented in an analysis of alternatives. The Commission shall mandate the SCCP to re-evaluate those substances as soon as safety concerns arise and at the latest every 5 years after their inclusion in Annexes III and IV. 4. For the purpose of fulfilling paragraph (1), (2) and (3) of this Article, the Commission shall follow the procedure referred to in Article 26. 5. The Commission shall at the latest 7 years after this Regulation has entered into force evaluate the effects of the measures set out in this Article and if necessary put forward a plan to ensure that the risk to consumers from substances with pronounced sensitising properties is adequately controlled.
2008/09/22
Committee: ENVI