10 Amendments of Robert NAVARRO
Amendment 87 #
2008/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 - Indent 3
Paragraph 3 - Indent 3
– a complete list of European rules currently in force which affect urban transport, directly or indirectly, with the potential for deregulationadjustment being considered in each case;
Amendment 111 #
2008/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that a European urban mobility observatory should be set up in order to – devise a set of standard indicators, in collaboration with the stakeholders concerned, for the purpose of measuring and comparing the performance of European towns and cities as regards sustainable mobility, which should be considered from every angle, that is to say, in terms of its logistical, environmental, and social aspects as well as from the safety point of view, – set up a centralised database pooling together the data collected by means of the above indicators and, on that basis, measure the progress made by individual towns and cities in implementing their sustainable mobility plans, – in the light of the data gathered, compile an annual league table of European towns and cities meeting given criteria, based on the progress observed and allowing for the respective starting points, – list innovative best practices in European towns and cities in the area of sustainable urban mobility, – help towns and cities exchange and disseminate those best practices, by regularly publishing a list of the most successful ground-breaking initiatives;
Amendment 118 #
2008/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers it necessary for the European Union to take into account the particular needs of urban transport, having regard to the new sustainable mobility objectives, in the policy areas where it has legislative power (e.g. environment policy, social and labour market policy, competition policy, industry policy, regional and cohesion policy, transport policy) and to make adjustments as and where required;
Amendment 241 #
2008/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Also calls on the Commission and the Member States to take advantage of the forthcoming comprehensive review of the structure of the Union budget in 2008- 2009 in order to rationalise the structure of European aid for sustainable mobility and allocate more substantial resources under that heading, consistent with the priority which has been assigned to the goal of combating climate change;
Amendment 242 #
2008/2041(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Notes that one way of bringing about such rationalisation might be to extend the time-frame and the scope of the Civitas programme, laying emphasis also on the dissemination and implementation of the best practices already developed under the Civitas I and II programmes;
Amendment 9 #
2008/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, in order to meet these challenges, the European Union and the Member States should, in a context of inadequate budgetary resources, set themselves specific coordinated priorities, concentrate their resources on a limited number of measures favouring sustainability and intermodality in freight transport, and take account of sensitive regions.
Amendment 46 #
2008/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls also on the Commission and Member States, pending the overhaul of the European Union's budget anticipated for 2009, already to consider the position of transport in that budget, in order to avoid any repetition of past errors and ensure sufficient future investment in strategic infrastructure to attain the objectives which the Union has set for itself with regard to sustainable development and emission reduction;
Amendment 57 #
2008/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that various horizontal techniques which would help simplify the transfer of freight not only from lorries to rail but also between differing rail gauges are often insufficiently standardised; therefore urges the international and European bodies to standardise these technologies in particular with a view to greater efficiency and cost reduction; stresses in this connection the importance of quickly adopting a European standard for intermodal loading units;
Amendment 67 #
2008/2008(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses thatWelcomes the Commission's efforts to promote the standardisingation and simplifyingication of the administration of the authorities involved in the freight transport market, together with simplified customs rules and procedures at borders is bound to lead to greater efficiency of freight transport logistic; welcomes in particular the decision to establish a European maritime space without barriers; urges the Commission to develop a single intermodal European freight document; recalls the experience gained from the 'one-stop shops' in the Trans- European Rail Freight Network (TERFN) initiative;
Amendment 54 #
2005/0238(COD)
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. :A Member State shall ensure that any ship which – flies the flag of a State whose detention rate falls into the black list, adopted in accordance with the Paris MOU on the basis of information recorded in the inspection database and as published annually by the Commission, and has been detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 36 months in a port of a Member State or of a State signatory of the Paris MOU; or corresponds to the criteria set out in this paragraph, where it – flies the flag of a State whose detention rate falls into the greyblack list, adopted in accordance with the Paris MOU on the basis of information recorded in the inspection database and as published annually by the Commission, and has been detained more than twice in the course of the preceding 2436 months in a port of call or watering of a Member State or of a State signatory of the Paris MOU; or – has been issued with a prevention of operation order under Directive 1999/35/EC more than twice in the course of the preceding 36 months in a port of call or watering of a Member State or of a State signatory of the Paris MOU, is refused access to its ports, except in the situations described is refused access to its ports of call and watering, except in the situations described in Article 20(6). Refusal of access shall become applicable as soon as the ship leaves the port of call or watering where it has been the subject of a third detention and where a refusal of access order has been issued.