BETA

7 Amendments of Thijs BERMAN related to 2010/2239(INI)

Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Insists that Member States better include the EU dimensEU secondary legislation in their policies with a view to improving the functioning of the internal market and facilitating workers‘ mobility;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Observes that pension reforms are necessaryoften required in the context of demographic ageing and the financial and economic crisis, but notes at the same time that the first objective of a reform should be to ensure adequate retirement income for all;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for facilitating the social dialogue in order to set up collective work-related pension systems in Member States;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the EU has a strong role to play in developing a definition of an adequate retirement benefit, in the form of a set of goods and services that older people need to enjoy for a decent life;deleted
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Observes that even if more pension products exist on the market, not every European citizen has access to thesethough there is a great variety of pension provisions in the different Member States, not every European citizen has access to these; therefore calls on the Commission to facilitate, through the exchange of best practices, the setting up of supplementary pension institutions managed or supervised by the social partners;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 143 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Considers that Solvency II is a valuable starting point for developing a solvency regime for IORPs; underlines that such a regime needs to be adapted to the specificities of pensions, in particular as regards the conditionality of pension rights, the duration of pension portfolios and the dedicated purpose vehicle operating a homogenous product portfolioStresses that it is important to clearly differentiate between the solvency regime for insurers and a possible pension security regime; underlines that such a regime needs to be adapted to the specificities of pensions;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON
Amendment 168 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls for due consideration to be given to the fact that IORPs are based on labour agreements and fulfil a social task and thus cannot be considered as financial institutions;
2010/12/10
Committee: ECON