BETA

28 Amendments of Bernadette VERGNAUD related to 2012/0192(COD)

Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1 – introductory part
(1) ‘Clinical studytrial’: any investigation in relation to humans intended:
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 1 – point a
(a) to discover or verify the clinical, pharmacological or other pharmacodynamic effects of one or more medicinal products; or
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 2
(2) ‘Clinical trial’: a clinical study which fulfils any of the following conditions: (a) the investigational medicinal products are not authorised; (b) according to the protocol of the clinical study, the investigational medicinal products are not used in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorisation of the Member State concerned; (c) the assignment of the subject to a particular therapeutic strategy is decided in advance and does not fall within normal clinical practice of the Member State concerned; (d) the decision to prescribe the investigational medicinal products is taken together with the decision to include the subject in the clinical study; (e) diagnostic or monitoring procedures in addition to normal clinical practice are applied to the subjects.deleted
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 3 – point b
(b) according to the protocol of the clinical trial, the investigational medicinal products are used in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorisation or their use is a standard treatment in any ofin the Member States concerned;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) the aim of the study is not that of identifying, characterising or quantifying a safety hazard, confirming the efficacy or safety profile of the medicinal product, or of measuring the effectiveness of risk management measures.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4
(4) ‘Non-interventional study’: a clinical study other than a clinical trial;study where the medicinal product is prescribed in the usual manner in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorisation. The assignment of the patient to a particular therapeutic strategy is not decided in advance by a trial protocol but falls within current practice and the prescription of the medicine is clearly separated from the decision to include the patient in the study.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 4 – indent 1 (new)
- No payment or other advantage or facilities can be made to healthcare professionals in order to encourage them to prescribe, dispense or use a given medicinal product.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 6
(6) ‘Normal clinical practice’'Best current proven intervention': the treatment regime typically followed to treat, prevent, or diagnose a disease or a disorder; according to the current reliable scientific evidence; (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 12
(12) 'Substantial modification': any change to any aspect of the clinical trial, including early termination of the trial, which is made after notification of the decision referred to in Articles 8, 14, 19, 20 and 23 and which is likely tomay have a substantial impact on the safety or rights of the subjects or on the reliability and robustness of the data generated in the clinical trial;, i.e. change the interpretation of the scientific documents used to support the conduct of the trial, or if the modifications are otherwise significant.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 13
(13) 'Sponsor': an individual, company, institution or organisation which takes responsibility for the initiation and, management and/or financing of the clinical trial;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 20
(20) ‘Protocol’: a document that describes the objectives, design, methodology, statistical considerations and organisation of a clinical trial. The term protocol refers to the protocol, successive versions of the protocol and protocol amendments;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 30 a (new)
(30a) 'Clinical study report' : a report containing the full protocol and its eventual subsequent modifications and dates thereof, a statistical analysis plan, summarised efficacy and safety data on all outcomes, and individual anonymised patient data in the format of tabulations or listings.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
– the data generated in the clinical trial are going to be relevant, reliable and robust.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 2 – title
AProtection of the subjects and authorisation procedure for a clinical trial
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a General principle An authorisation for the conduct of a clinical trial by a competent authority of a concerned Member States can be granted only if the concerned ethics committee has given its approval.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 b (new)
Article 4b Best current proven intervention The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention, except in the following circumstances: (a) the use of placebo, or no treatment, is acceptable in studies where no current proven intervention exists; or (b) where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons the use of placebo is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of an intervention and the patients who receive placebo or no treatment will not be subject to any risk of serious or irreversible harm. Extreme care must be taken to avoid abuse of the option set out in point (b) of the first subparagraph.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 c (new)
Article 4c Toxicological experiments The clinical trial subject's protection is notably safeguarded through risk assessment based on the results of toxicological experiments prior to any clinical trial involving the use of a non- authorised investigational medicinal product.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In order to obtain an authorisation, the sponsor shall submit an application dossier to the intended Member States concerned through the portal referred to in Article 77 (hereinafter ‘EU portal’).Within six days following submission of the application dossier, Member States shall collectively appoint a reporting Member State and a co- reporting Member State.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The sponsor shall propose one of the Member States concerned as reporting Member State.deleted
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Where the proposed reporting Member State does not wish to be the reporting Member State, it shall agree with another Member State concerned that the latter will be the reporting Member State. If no Member State concerned accepts to be the reporting Member State, the proposed reporting Member State shall be the reporting Member State.deleted
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Within six days following submission of the application dossier, the proposedappointment of the reporting Member State, the reporting Member State shall notify the sponsor through the EU portal of the following:
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) whether it is the reporting Member State or which other Member State concerned is the co- reporting Member State;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) the clinical trial registration number in the EU portal.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Where the proposed reporting Member State has not notified the sponsor within the time period referred to in paragraph 2, the clinical trial applied for shall be considered as falling within the scope of this Regulation, the application shall be considered complete, the clinical trial shall be considered a low-intervention clinical trial if this is claimed by the sponsor, and the proposed reporting Member State shall be the reporting Member State.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) significant differences in normal clinical practice between the Member State concerned and the reporting Member State which would lead to a subject receiving an inferior treatmentcare than in normal clinical practice;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) Infringement of more comprehensive national provisions for clinical trial subjects' protection than the provisions of this Regulation, in particular as regards vulnerable populations;
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) refusal of the Ethics Committee to approve the conduct of the clinical trial in the Member State concerned.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Where the Member State concerned disagrees with the conclusion onf the basis of point (a) of the second subparagraph, it shall communicate its disagreement, together with a detailed justification based on scientific and socio-economic arguments, and a summary thereofreporting Member State, it shall communicate its disagreement, through the EU portal to the Commission, to all Member States, and to the sponsor.
2013/02/01
Committee: IMCO