27 Amendments of Kartika Tamara LIOTARD related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Noise assessments should build on existing information available and ensure that such information is reliable and accessible to competent authorities and stakeholders. Competent authorities should put in place the necessary monitoring and enforcement toolse based on objective and measurable criteria common to all the Member States. They should be accessible to all stakeholders. Competent authorities should put in place the necessary monitoring and enforcement tools. Noise assessments should involve consultations of local residents and be carried out or supervised by outside agencies independent of the airport operator.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) This legislative act deals solely with aircraft noise. It does not seek to regulate the impact of pollutant emissions from the operation of aircraft and measures to reduce those emissions. Rules and procedures governing emissions-related operating restrictions should be laid down in a separate legislative act.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to enable selection of the most cost- effective noise mitigation measures in accordance with the Balanced Approach so as to achieve, so as to achieve, in the light of the Balanced Approach, improved neighbourhood noise protection consistent with the sustainable development of the airport and air traffic management network capacity from a gate-to-gate perspective.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) ‘air traffic centre’ means the airport and its impact area;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
(2b) ‘impact area’ means the area around the airport within which local noise emission limit values are exceeded; the impact area includes the take-off and landing routes;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘Noise-related action' means any measure that impacts the noise climate around airports, for which the principles of the ICAO Balanced Approach based on the banning of excessive noise apply, including other non-operational actions that can affect the number of people exposed to aircraft noise;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – title
Article 3 – title
Competent authorities, consultation and right to take legal action
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Prior to the adoption of operating restrictions, a consultation procedure shall be carried out to hear the parties concerned.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Member States shall guarantee the right to take legal action against the measures implemented by the competent authority, in accordance with the relevant national laws and procedures.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) select the most effective noise protection measures;
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) decide on the measures and provide for sufficient notificationinform the Commission of them;
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall, when takingdeciding on noise- related action, consider the following combination of available measures, with a view to determining the most cost-effective combination of measures, inter alia:
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) regional land-use planning and management;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) noise abatement operational procedures, including changes to landing and take-off routes;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) capacity restrictions and a reduction in airport size;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictions.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Measures or a combination of measures taken in accordance with this Regulation for a given airport shall not be more restrictive than necessarymust be suitable to achieve at least the environmental noise abatement objectives set for that airport. Operating restrictions shall be non-discriminatory, in particular on grounds of nationality, identity or activity of aircraft operators.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authorities shall useassessment of the current and future noise situation shall take account of the method, indicators and information describedlaid down in Annex I for the assessment of the current and future noise situation, provided that this is commensurate with the proposed operating restrictions and the characteristics of the airport.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The competent authorities shall ensure that, at the appropriate level, a forum for technical cooperation is established betweenstablish a consultation forum which brings together the airport operator, the aircraft operator and, representatives of the air navigation service provider, for actions which these operators are responsible for, and taking due account of the interdependency between and representatives of local residents. Planning, technical and organisational measures to mitigate noise and to reduce emissions. The members of this forum for technical cooperation shall regularly consult local residents or their representatives, and provide technical information and advice on noise mitigating measures to the competent authorities shall be discussed in this forum.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The competent authorities shall assess the cost-effectiveness of the new measures, as referred to in paragraph 3 in accordance with Annex II. A minor technical amendment to an existing measure without substantive implications on capacity or operthe light of the informations is not considered as a new operating restrictionn Annex II.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4a) noise-related changes in the value of properties;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
4b) impact on business location criteria in the vicinity of the airport;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
4c) impact on working conditions at airports;
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 d (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 d (new)
4d) impact on road and rail transport;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 e (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 4 e (new)
4e) impact on external costs;