3 Amendments of Kartika Tamara LIOTARD related to 2011/2226(DEC)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Has also taken serious note of ‘revolving door’ cases and the need to establish and implement respective measures, urgently, to avoid such incidents, which undermine the Authority's credibility; is convinced that such actions need to be accompanied by a set of consequences enforced when those rules are not respected;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Is firmly convinced that necessary steps have to be taken should cases of non- compliance with existing rules occur; believes that, in such cases, the Authority has to draw up an action plan aiming to remedy the shortcomings and its implementation should be monitored by the European Parliament and the European Parliament or the European legislator has to address these problems, as a matter of priority, by changing the existing rules and regulations to eliminate possible loopholes;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes, however, that the discharge decision for the Authority cannot be based upon additional requirements, e.g. OECD guidelines, when the implementation of those requirements have neither been officially called for by the EU legislator nor by specific arrangements within the Agencies during the respective discharge procedure; invites the European institutions to examine, as a matter of priority, if it is advisable to incorporate and to commit to additional guidelines in a possible common framework for all European institutions and bodies;