5 Amendments of Vladimír MAŇKA related to 2011/2017(BUD)
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Is expecting the Bureau to submit realistic requests when presenting the estimates and is ready to examine its proposals on a fully needs-based and prudent basis in order to ensure an appropriate and efficient functioning of the institution;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Requests a detailed and clear overview of those budget lines that were under-implemented in 2010 and looks forward to analysing the reasons for this; also wishes to receive an account of all carry-overs and their use in 2010, as well as an update on the final assigned revenues compared to the amounts that were budgeted;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that Members must be given access to quality services in order to be able to perform their duties on an equal footing; stresses, therefore, the importance of Members being able to work and express themselves in their moequal treatment of Members of all nationalities and languages in terms of their possibility to carry out their duties and political activity incumbent upon them in their tonguown language if they so choose; finds, for instance, the absence of interpretation in committee meetings to be unacceptable; believes that the principle of sound financial management needs to apply to interpretation and translation as well;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Is also of the opinion that all means must be sought to increase the flexibility of interpretation as a crucial step to ensure good working practices and notes that, in many instances, problems and financial wastage could be avoided if there were a possibility to swap languages at short notice depending on the actual attendance at meetings rather than the planned attendance;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Believes that, as is the case for all big organisations, an independent external viewpoint on how resources are used and how work is organised is sometimes necessary and can only be beneficial if handled correctly; while stressing that a political European institution such as Parliament is unique in character, considers that, in the long term, consideration should be given to carrying out such an external analysis of its organisation and management; believes that in 2012 some specific sector(s) could be identified and examined in this way;