6 Amendments of Vladimír MAŇKA related to 2016/2242(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the objective of the Youth Guarantee is to ensure that all young people under the age of 259 receive a good- quality offer of employment, continued education, an apprenticeship or traineeship, within four months of leaving formal education or becoming unemployed;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the necessity of guaranteeing a long-term commitment through ambitious programming and stable financing from both the EU budget and the national budgets in order to offer a full access to all young people who are Not in Employment, Education or Training (NEETs) in the EU;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that, according to the International Labour Organisation, an efficient Youth Guarantee requires an annual funding of approximately 45 billion EUR for the EU-28; this funding should be viewed as an investment, given the significant reduction that it will produce, if effective, in the costs associated with youth employment;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Member States to properly assess the costs of their Youth Guarantee schemes, to manage expectations by setting realistic and achievable objectives and targets, to mobilise additional resources from their domestic budgets and to reinforce the financing of their public employment services in order to enable them to fulfil additional duties linked to YEI implementation;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that an evaluation of the YEI is to be concluded by the EC by the end of year 2017, and expects a swift introduction of the necessary adjustments to ensure a successful implementation; stresses the importance of a continued assessment of the performance of the YEI by relevant stakeholders, including youth organizations;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Expects an ambitious political commitment for the next MFF and recalls that is should be financed with new appropriations, and not through flexibility instruments or redeployments of the existing budgetary appropriations;