Activities of Jean-Marie CAVADA related to 2010/2306(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (6)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Internet’s neutrality is compromised when content protected by intellectual property rights is pirated;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas in this regard as soon as they become suppliers of protected content, the various Internet operators need to abide by the rules in force by purchasing the IPR and paying suitable sums along the chain of title;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that although the Internet is a marvellous tool for accessing content, it can also be regarded as destroying value in creation and the cultural industries;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Acknowledges that creation and innovation are matters of general interest and urges that investing in programmes should be prioritised and supported in order to stimulate the supply of good quality content available on the networks;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that Internet neutrality should not be synonymous with ‘neutralising the Internet’ and that it is therefore clear that the interests of the contents’ creators should be protected through their intellectual property rights;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Emphasises that the search for a paying economic model, such as the premium services for film works between the OSP and the IAP, seems to be the route that should be taken to allow the fixed and mobile networks to continue to develop and so there are no long-term expectations that works protected by IPR can be accessed free of charge;