5 Amendments of Nathalie GRIESBECK related to 2014/0217(COD)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a
Article 2 – point a
(a) ‘Law enforcement officers’professionals or aspiring professionals' means officers of police, customs and of other relevant services, including Union bodies, responsible for preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime that affect a common interest covered by a Union policy and for, public order, crisis management and international policing of major events., including employees or experts of Union institutions, bodies, offices and departments whose competences are related to those tasks;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) common curricula to raise awareness and knowledge, address gaps and/or facilitate a common approach in relation to cross-border criminal phenomena, in particular with regard to terrorism, cybercrime, financial investigation, and participation in Union missions;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 24 – paragraph 3
3. The provisional seat of CEPOL shall be in Budapest, Hungary.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall present, no later than two years after the date of application of this Regulation, a cost- benefit analysis and an impact assessment on the provisional seat as compared to The Hague as an alternative scenario and, if appropriate, a legislative proposal to amend paragraph 3 accordingly.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
1. No later than 53 years after the date referred to in Article 43of application of this Regulation and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall commission an evaluation to assess particularly the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of CEPOL and its working practices. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify the mandate of CEPOL, and the financial implications of any such modification.