BETA

8 Amendments of Ingeborg GRÄSSLE related to 2010/2079(INI)

Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to contribute to the present reform of the Financial Regulation which pursues the following aims: increase of coherence in the present legal framework; reduction of provisions; clarity and unambiguousness and manageability. To this end, calls for the incorporation of the Rules for Participation into the body of the Financial Regulation;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that any simplification process should be carefully deployed within the current FP7 to maintain stability, consistency and legal certainty for the participants; in that regard stresses that, whereas uniform interpretation of existing rules should be pursued as a matter of urgency, for running contracts the application of post-conclusion 'guidelines' should be avoided;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses its concern that the current system and the practice of FP7 management are excessively control- oriented, thus leading to waste of resources, lower participation and less attractive research landscapes; notes with concern that the current management system of ‘zero risk tolerance’ seems to avoid rather than to manage risks; calls therefore for the revision and/or extended interpretation of the EU Staff Regulation on the issue of personal liability, as well as for the presentation of concrete proposals in the ongoing reform of the Financial Regulation (e.g. insurance or risk-pooling system);
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that EU monitoring and financial control should be primarily aimed at safeguarding public funds and combating fraud, whilst distinguishing clearly between fraud and errors; in that regard considers it necessary to establish a clearer definition of 'errors' including the mechanisms for the establishment of errors vs. differing interpretations; calls, therefore, for a thorough analysis of errors and respective remedial actions;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the management of European research funding should be more trust-based and risk- tolerant towards participants at all stages, with flexible EU rules that can be applied in accordance with national regulations ando align better, where possible and existing, with different national regulations and internationally recognised accounting practices;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Urges the Commission to actively pursue Parliament's requests as raised in its discharge decisions for the years 2007 and 2008, in particular to make concrete proposals for simplifying the calculation of average personnel cost and to apply these proposals;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Requests further clarification on the definition of eligible costs (such as taxes and charges in personnel costs), as well as on the question whether VAT can be covered under eligible costs; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of exempting purchases financed by Union funds from VAT in the Member States; requests further clarification on procedures related to exchange rates for partners using different currencies;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Recommends improvement in the stability provided to stakeholders by having, as far as possible, one single Commission project officer, delivering personalised support throughout the lifetime of a project with consistent implementation of rules; as well as a 'one face to the customer' approach, in which advice on multiple programmes can be received from just one contact point;
2010/07/16
Committee: ITRE