BETA

7 Amendments of Thomas ULMER related to 2010/2211(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that the next financial perspectives should achieve the EU 2020 Strategy objectives, especially the 20/20/20 climate and energy objectives, including a rise to 30% of the target for emission reductions, and meet the "Resource Efficient Europe" flagship initiative goals;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Reiterates the importance of transforming the EU economy into a resource-efficient economy; considers therefore that the EU should use its budget to drive reductions in the use of resources and dependency on imports, while increasing recycling and restoration in the fields of waste, water, materials and land;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need to strengthen integration of EU environmental and climate legislation and objectives into sectoral policies (including the CAP, the cohesion policy and, the CFP and development policy); suggests therefore mainstreaming EU finances to ensure compliance with EU environmental legislation and policy objectives and as suggested by the Commission's budget review include an obligation to identify in a transparent manner where sectoral programmes have promoted climate objectives specified in the Europe 2020 Strategy; underlines the importance of future research and innovation programmes in delivering the EU's objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Is convinced that the EU budget should support the provision of public goods that are unlikely to be sufficiently delivered by the market; environmental public goods include the preservation of biodiversity and ecosystem, wilderness, climate stability and carbon absorption capacity, water provision and quality, air and soil quality, resilience to fire and floods, as well as the maintenance of valued cultural and historic landscapes; believes, therefore, that the Common Agricultural Policy should reward farmers and land managers for the delivery of public goods, such as an attractive countryside rich in biodiversity, and that the Structural and Cohesion Funds should foster ecological sustainable development and the transition to a low energy-consumption and resource-efficient society;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for education and lifelong learning to be regarded as key factors in improving public health;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Is convinced that economic growth, job security and a preventive approach to healthcare must be promoted jointly;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines the importance of the LIFE+ programme as the main EU instrument entirely dedicated to environmental financing and underlines the need to strengthen LIFE+ in the future financial framework to achieve EU environmental objectives while promoting synergies with other EU financial instruments;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI