6 Amendments of Christian EHLER related to 2010/2079(INI)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas legal certainty is of paramount importance to establish and increase mutual trust between all stakeholders,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to stipulate, in the case of each individual simplification measure, whether it enters into force under the current legal framework or whether changes to the rules of the Financial Regulation, Rules of Participation or the specific rules applying to FP programmes are required; calls on the Commission to contribute to the present reform of the Financial Regulation, which pursues the following aims: 1. Increase of coherence in the present legal framework, 2. Reduction of provisions, 3. Clarity and unambiguousness, 4. Manageability;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that European research funding should be more trust-based and risk- tolerant towards participants at all stages, with flexible EU rules that can be applied in accordance witho align better, where possible and existing, with different nationally regulations andcognised accounting practices;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Supports the reduction in combinations of funding rates and methods for defining indirect costs across the different instruments; aAcknowledges that neither the current differentiation between universities/research centres, industry and SMEs nor the differentiation betweenshould not be abolished, but that a uniform funding rate over all activitiy types (management, research, demonstration and dissemination) should be abolishedintroduced; supports the reduction in combinations of funding rates and methods for defining indirect costs across the different instruments;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CallIs onf the Commission to further clarify the terminology on the use of flat- rate and lump sums; iopinion that lump-sums and flat rate should be applied where appropriate; calls ofn the opinion that lump-sums and flat rates should be exceptional andCommission to further clarify the terminology in used on a voluntary basis and only in justified caseflat-rate and lump sums;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Has strong reservations about the effects of abolishing theAcknowledges the need for expert knowledge e.g. by opinions provided by Member States representatives with regard ton selection decisions, especially in security and defence research and in cases of ethical evaluation of the projects; favours instead a simplified written procedure based on the current mechanisms;