6 Amendments of Vural ÖGER related to 2007/2267(INI)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas corruption remains a serious problem in Croatia, and whereas on Transparency International's 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index, Croatia had an average score of 4,1 (on a scale of 0 "highly corrupt" to 10 "highly clean");
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is aware of the negative impact which the judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) on the Vukovar war crimes cases have had on Croatia's public perception of the work of the ICTY; urEncourages the Croatian government to take steps to restore popular support for the role of the ICTY in addressing the crimes perpetrated during the Yugoslav conflict;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the strengthening of the mandate of the Office for the Prevention of Corruption and Organised Crime (USKOK) and the increased number of corruption cases which are being prosecuted; calls for these efforts to be maintained in order to eradicate the – in some cases unacceptably high – level of corruption, which undermines the economic development of the country; and the level of reliability of public administration; in particular asks for additional efforts in combating corruption in the core institutions of the executive and judicial branches of government as well as in public and local administration;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Insists that new legislation should be rapidly implemented, since this provides a reliable yardstick against which to assess the country's preparedness for membership, a preparedness based on facts and not merely on the basis of the adopted legislation, especially as far as judicial, public administration and economic reform,s, and the fight against corruption and economic reforms are concerned;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Regrets the fact that the Croatian government has decided to introduce unilaterally the Ecological and Fishing Protection Zone (ZERP) in the Adriatic, thus reneging on the agreement reached in 2004 with the Italian and Slovenian authorities; reminds Croatia that, unless a commonly agreed solution is found, this could have serious repercussions on the pace of the accession negotiations; calls on all parties involved to find a comprehensive solution;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Notes that addressing border related issues is particularly defined as a priority for Croatia in its Accession Partnership; points out that the sea border between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia has not yet been defined; regrets that no common solution was found over the plans of the opening of Peljesac bridge construction works as Bosnia and Herzegovina voiced opposition to it; calls on both parties to find a comprehensive solution;