BETA

14 Amendments of Rebecca HARMS related to 2008/2005(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the ‘Technology Map’ (SEC(2007) 1510) and the ‘Capacities Map’ (SEC(2007)1511) accompanying the abovementioned Communication,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the threat posed by climate change continues to grow and the COP14 talks at Poznan and COP15 talks at Copenhagen will be of critical importance to achieving an international agreement on climate change to replace the Kyoto protocol regime,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Commission has estimated that it will be costing EU EUR 70 billion per annum by 2020 to achieve the EU's greenhouse gas reduction and renewable energy targets, which is equivalent to the windfall profits of the electricity generators in just five Member States, i.e. UK, Germany, Spain, Italy and Poland,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) allocates only EUR 2,3 billion over the seven-year programming period to non-nuclear energy research,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that financing for research for renewable and efficiency technologies must be at least double compared to financing for other non-renewable energy sources;
2008/05/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the Euratom part of the FP7 will grant approximately EUR 4.1 billion to nuclear energy over the period 2007- 2013, EUR 2.9 billion of which may finance the sole construction of ITER and fusion research,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. Whereas the Commission’s "Technologies Map", referring to fusion, recognises, “There is of course no obvious market positioning for a technology needing another 30-40 years to reach maturity, especially in view of the current uncertainties in predicting the contributions from other, mainly renewable, energy sources over that time- scale.”,
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the SET Plan should support activities which promote public acceptance oftimulate public debate on the merits of different new energy technologiy choices;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that cheaper, more effective low carbon technologiesrenewable energy technologies and technologies for energy efficiency are critical to achieving a newpost-2012 international agreement on climate change to replace the Kyoto protocol regime;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly believes that increased support is urgently needed for low carbon technologies in the demonstration and commercialisation phase; therefore welcom for new decentralised renewable technologies,; the proposed EIIs; stresses, however,refore stresses the need to also increase this support for R&D in such technologies that will be needed over the longer term;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Strongly supports the proposed EIIs on wind, solar, bio-energy, CO2 capture, transport and storage, electricity grids and nuclear fissionDoubts whether the priorities identified for the new EIIs represent the technologies with the greatest cost effective potential to deliver our energy goals;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology will be of critical importance in tackling global climate change; calls on the Commission to include the 12 proposed CCS demonstration projects (the so-called EU Flagship Programme) within the EIIs; notes that support for clean coal technologies will make it easier and cheaper to deploy CCScould play a role in reducing greenhouse gases emissions in the long term; calls on the industry to fully finance CCS demonstration projects; notes that pursuing coal generation would be easier if CCS would be made mandatory;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Believes that, given the priority attached to climate change and energy issues, significant additional EU resources for a low carbon technologiesrenewables future are needed and should be deployed urgently, if they are to help to meet the EU's 2020 targets;
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Notes that, under the proposed revision of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), auction revenues willcould provide a significant source of funding for new low carbon technologies; believes that businesses affected by the ETS should be involved in deciding how this funding is utilisedenhancing the EU's energy security of supply while achieving its climate, energy efficiency and renewables targets.
2008/05/08
Committee: ITRE