BETA

6 Amendments of Holger KRAHMER related to 2009/2108(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Visa 7 a (new)
7 a having regard to the its resolution of 22 May 2007 on halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 (T6-0195/2007)),
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. underlines the need for a thorough impact assessment and suitability study before deciding on the precise targets and sub-targets of the future EU biodiversity strategy;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. takes the view that farmers play a vital role in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective; points out that in 1992 an initial impetus was given to integrating protection of biodiversity into the common agricultural policy (CAP), and that subsequently the 2003 reform has introduced measures such as cross compliance, the single farm payment (decoupling) and rural development which have benefits for biodiversity;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Expresses, however, its concerns about the EU farmers' ability to continue to produce high-quality food competitively; believes that the CAP reform should properly reward EU farmers for their efforts in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. takes the view that soil plays a vital role in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective; is however convinced of the fact that this issue should be dealt on the level of EU Member States as it is a matter of national legislation; urges therefore the Member States to move towards the adoption of national provisions, if it is not already the case;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Stresses the need to develop a clear baseline, on the basis of which the Commission is to set realistic and evidence-based (sub-)targets; underlines that existing data should be used rather than insisting on new data collection;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI