BETA

11 Amendments of Gabriele ZIMMER related to 2010/2300(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that clearly defined, widely supported and closely monitored indicators are essential in order to demonstrate the concrete effects of budget support in third countries, and that the relevant budgetary authorities should be updated regularly on the indicators and guidelines that shape the decision-making process in relation to budget support; underlines that these indicators must be better tailored to the specific needs of partner countries in order to avoid the ‘one size fits all’ approach taken by the Commission, which is potentially counter-productive; underlines that indicators must be focused particularly on combating poverty and the fulfilling of the Millenuium Development Goals (using the MDGs indicators) including crosscutting themes as gender equity and access to universal energy and potable water; stresses the added value for Europe of a successful development aid which might have as a result important savings of EU funds when migration flows are reduced at the place of origin; emphasizes therefore that EU developement funds should first of all finance small local and regional projects as economic and infrastructure developments that support people directly;
2011/03/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Takes the view that financing decisions on budget support must be driven not only by expected benefits but also by the short- and long-term risks, as for example, the possibility of political changes or consequences of climate change, incurred in both donor and partner countries; notes that the Court of Auditors, in its Special Report1 , is in full agreement with this assessment by highlighting that a sound risk management framework is still to be developed and implemented;
2011/03/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers effective mutual accountability to be a cornerstone of budget support and a prerequisite for its sustainability: not only should governments in both donor and partner countries be fully accountable domestically, but it is equally important that governments, parliamentarians and citizens on both sides are accountable to their respective counterparts, whether the latter be donors or recipients; takes the view, in this connection, that further efforts should be made to enhance public awareness in donor and partner countries of the scope and results of budget support; and proposes therefore to install open and transparent mechanisms to ensure that every citizen, NSA or LA is able to monitor the budget during its realization;
2011/03/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is firmly convinced that a thorough analysis of the future of EU budget support to third countries must address the issue of budgetisation of the European Development Fund; is aware of the historical and institutional background to the current situation, but believes that the time has come for the Council, the Member States and the ACP countries to acknowledge that this state of affairs is detrimental to the efficiency, transparency and accountability of EU budget support; underlines the necessity of full transparency in order to ensure that EU development funds finance the intended programmes and to avoid that EU funds are turned aside; rejects fully that EU development funds are derived to support military actions;
2011/03/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States and the Commission, in line with the practice established in other policy fields, to improve the coordination of their respective budget support to third countries in order to avoid potential or existing overlaps, inconsistencies and incoherencies, which are all the more unacceptable in a context of scarce funding; maintains that a focus on specific areas offering the greatest added value should drive EU budget support throughout all phases of preparation and delivery; asks for a sound cooperation between the EP Committees to enhance the coordination of their policies concerning third countries to avoid inconsistencies as for example between trade restrictions, agricultural agreements and development aid; maintains that a focus on specific areas offering the greatest added value should drive EU budget support throughout all phases of preparation and delivery to create the personal, technological, infrastructural and financial capacity to eradicate poverty and start their (beneficiaries') independent sustainable development as soon as possible;;
2011/03/15
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that budget support must not be used to reinforce EU´s particular economic and strategic interests, but to reach development objectives of and for developing countries, especially to eradicate poverty and hunger;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Demands that parliaments’ democratic budget control in recipient countries should be crucial to receive budget support; asks for a broad participation of parliaments and civil society in partner countries in order to democratically decide about the use of budget support funds;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reminds that public investments in public goods, such as education, social security, infrastructures and productive capacities, especially with regard to smallholder farming and support to local markets, are crucial for successful development strategies;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls the EU and its Member States to fulfil its commitments to spend 0,56% of GNI and 0,7% respectively until 2015 in ODA and for the eradication of poverty and hunger; demands a moratorium of all agreements and contracts between the EU and third countries which do not contribute to or hinder the accomplishment of the MDGs until 2015; asks the EU and partner countries to significantly increase investments in agriculture and manufacturing capacities in order to accomplish the human right to food;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to fulfil their objectives such as spending two thirds of ODA as budget support;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Reminds the Commission and the Member States to harmonise their development cooperation between each other and to improve its mutual accountability with recipient states;
2011/04/12
Committee: DEVE