6 Amendments of Andreas MÖLZER related to 2011/2245(INI)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ascertain whether the EED will generate a more strategic and political EU approach to democracy supportsupporting democratic developments by providing context- specific, flexible, timely and bottom-up assistance with rapid reprogramming where this is needed to facilitate democratic transition in partner countries;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) ensure that the EED fosters and encourages ‘deep and sustainable democracy’ in pre-transition and transition countrieefforts to bring about profound and sustainable democratic reforms in countries where a transition to democracy is pending or in progress, with a primary, although not exclusive, focus on the European Neighbourhood;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) enable the EED to act in the early stages of transitionhe democratisation process, to kick-start projects which thus far could not be supported by the EU owing to bureaucratic restrictions; and model the EED in such a way that it is less risk-aversefunctions more quickly, efficiently and comprehensively;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ensure that the EED has robust links with beneficiary groups, but without having regional offices, relying instead on local organisations or independent experts and practitioners, while ensuring that no inefficiency arises and, indeed, that there is no misuse of the monies made available;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
(k) structure the EED as an administratively flexible and efficient Brussels-based structure, with straightforward grant-award mechanisms; applicants should not be required to undergo cumbersome tendering proceduresand rapid but comprehensive mechanisms for awarding grants where justified; co-financing by beneficiaries should not be a prerequisite for funding;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) review after one year of activities – or, in special circumstances, for example if there is an above-average number of funding awards in a short timespan, on a six-monthly basis – the impact and performance of the EED;