5 Amendments of Andreas MÖLZER related to 2013/2109(INL)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. Whereas Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA constitutes the cornerstone of mutual recognition and has been very successful inits purpose is to speeding up surrender compared to traditional extradition procedures among Member States;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. Whereas problems have however arisen in its operation, some specific to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and resulting largely from poor implementation, but others shared with the set of mutual recognition instruments due to the incomplete and unbalanced development of the Union area of criminal justice;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C – point x
Recital C – point x
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 – point d
Paragraph 3 – point d
(d) a procedure whereby a mutual recognition measure canmust, if necessary, be validated in the issuing State by a judge, court, investigating magistrate or public prosecutor, in order to overcome the differing interpretations of the term “judicial authority”;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8