10 Amendments of Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA related to 2009/2178(INI)
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas in order properly to address the question of IPR enforcement in the internal market, it is important to take into consideration not only EU territory but also the situation at the EU's external borders and in third countries, in order to ensure compatibility between the protection of content of Community origin and the holders of rights thereto and consumer access to non-Community content,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas current Community law constitutes no impediment to the development of multi-territory licensing systems,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas in various areas, including the text- and image-based sector, there are business models and channels and licensing schemes that provide broad access to works in a wide range of forms and formats, both within and across national borders,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas today's intellectual property rights management systems are already highly transparent and effective,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the communication of 11 September 2009 from the Commission concerning additional non-legislative measures; regrets however that the communication does not deal with the matter of completing the legislative framework by introducing a set of measures to combat intellectual property right infringements in an effective manner;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In the light of the experiences undergone by rights-holders in some Member States, does not share the Commission's certitude that the current civil enforcement framework in the EU is effective and harmonised to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market and reminds the Commission that the report on the application of Directive 2004/48/EC is essential to confirm those claims;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need toCalls for both the Commission and the Member States and their relevant authorities to take part in organiseing a campaign to raise awareness at European, national and local level of the risks to consumer health and safety arising from counterfeit products and also the adverse impact of counterfeiting and piracy on the economy and society;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the need to educate young people to enable them to understand what is at stake in intellectual property and to identify clearly what is legal and what is not, by means of targeted public awareness campaigns, particularly against on-line piracy; in which national governments are more actively involved, particularly against on-line piracy and with a view to raising awareness of the role played by collecting societies in protecting IPRs;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Agrees with the Commission that additional non-legislative measures are useful to improve the application of IPR, particularly measures arising from in-depth dialogue among stakeholders, without prejudice to the establishment of secondary legislation laying down coercive measures to apply in the event of non-compliance;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Commission to think broadly about methods of facilitating industry's access to the digital market without geographical borders by addressing urgently the issue of multi- territory licences as well as an effective and transparent system for rights management, as this is a requirement for the growth in services which are legal and which meet consumer demand for ubiquitous, instant and customised access to contentthe introduction of a compulsory collective system for the management of the right to make content available, at least for performers, granting them an inalienable right to fair remuneration, as provided for, moreover, in the aforementioned Commission document of 22 October 2009, as this is a requirement for the growth in services which are legal and which meet consumer demand for ubiquitous, instant and customised access to content; takes the view that bodies representing rights-holders should be consulted on a possible approximation with the rules governing satellite broadcasting, as laid down in the 1993 Satellite and Cable Directive, which could be used as a basis for establishing a model for the management of and payment for online rights;