8 Amendments of Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI related to 2020/2072(INL)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the situation with regard of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights has substantially deteriorated in a number of Member States; recalls in particular the importance of upholding the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights and the obligation of Member States to ensure effective judicial protection, which is a core value of the Union as a community based on law;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that the Union institutions are to practise mutual sincere cooperation in line with Article 13(2) TEU and therefore should all contribute to the defence of the Union values in accordance with the procedures set out in the Treaties; calls for such activities to be governed by an interinstitutional agreement and calls for the existing mechanisms to be consolidatedreviewed in line with the division of the competences between three institutions stipulated in the Treaties, while setting out detailed assessments of the situations in all Member States, determining preventive and corrective actionslevant actions to be undertaken;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that for effective implementation, in accordance with Article 295 TFEU and their power of self- organisation, the three institutions should establish a joint advisory body responsible for coordinating their cooperationfacilitating dialogue among them in this field;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Insists that the Annual Monitoring Cycle should be governed by the principles of transparency, impartiality, and equality between Member States, be based on objective evidence and lead to effective and realistic measurrecommendations prepared by independent experts designated by the Member States;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Insist that, regardless of the annual cycle, while considering the gravity of the possible consequences of rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights violations and the scale of its effects, a specialthe regular procedure, for urgent cases of violation of Union valueseseen in he Art. 7 TUE should be considerapplied;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights that the Conference on the Future of Europe provides a momentum for better understanding the need to protect Union values in this context; therefore, in the event of Treaty changes being made in the future, the effectiveness of the Article 7 procedure should be enhanced by removing the requirement for unanimity and reinforcing the sanction mechanism; while taking into account the principle of proportionality and subsidiarity guaranteed by the Treaties.