BETA

12 Amendments of Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ related to 2009/2155(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas simplification should be addressgeared to farmers at the point of deliverycilitating and improving daily management by farmers on their farm,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the objective should be to reduce the costadministrative costs and bureaucratic burdens of the CAP, both direct and indirect,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas a new CAP should be more market-oriented and focused on reducing the excessive protectionism that hinders competition, without forgetting the need to have tools available that make it possible to correct market volatility, given the special features of this economic activity,
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the CAP to be outcome-driven rather than focused on regulation, with Member States offering more help and advice to farmers, and believes that, to that end, a telephone helpline should be instituted in all Member States to assist farmerit might be useful to create a telephone helpline to assist farmers in some Member States;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that, where possible and where it would result in a real reduction in the number of checks by the administration, Member States should allow self- certification;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for the CAP to be simpler, more transparent and more equitable; in this respect a single flat rate payment would be preferable;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that the future single payment should be based on a simplified flat rate basic support system based on uniform payments in order to make the CAP simpler, fairer and more transparent;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that, for health reasons, the identification of animals should continue to be done using the producer number instead of the holding numberholding number, since each holding represents a distinct epidemiological unit;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that only one holding number should be issued per producer;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that the number of registers should be limited, with batch registration combined with holding number being sufficient, and that there is no benefit in adding an individual register for each holding;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that double reporting on the movement of sheep and goats to the central data base should be abolished (slaughter report + holding registers)should be simplified as much as possible, permitting the use of new technologies for this purpose;
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the use of handwritten ear tags should be allowed for sheep in the same way as for bovines;deleted
2010/02/26
Committee: AGRI