6 Amendments of Tadeusz ZWIEFKA related to 2013/2024(INI)
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls urgently for measuresfor future reflection to address the so-called Copenhagen dilemma, describing a situation in which the Union sets high standards for candidate countries to meet but lacks tools for Member States; announces its intention to set up a Copenhagen Commission within the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recognises that initiatives in the field of the mutual recognition of legal situations, judgments and documents play a very important role in this respect, as mutual recognition leaves the legal systems of Member States unchanged, but reduces the inconvenience which differences in regulation caadditional financial burdens and legal obstacles; and at the same time enhances truset for individual citizens;the citizens and business while exercising the freedom of movement
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Notes that legislative initiatives in the field of civil law have so far largely been focused on substantive law, to the detriment of procedural law; calls for a greater focus to be put on procedural law in the future;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Acknowledges the progress made with the roadmap for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, but regrets that key proposals on legal aid and vulnerable suspects are outstanding and that the level of ambition of the Council seems to be decreasing more and more; encourages European institutions to play more active role with regards to proposals on legal aid and vulnerable suspects; urges Member States to use alternative methods that have proved to be good examples of best practice in the field of free legal advice, including pro bono agencies and legal clinics;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Proposes a systematic and independent ex-post evaluation of new legislation that should also assess the continuing need for legislation in this area; Recalls the commitment made by Parliament and Council in the 2005 Interinstitutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment to carry out impact assessments, when they consider this to be appropriate and necessary for the legislative process, prior to the adoption of any substantive amendment, and calls on the committees to make use of the Impact Assessment Unit in implementing this commitment;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
Paragraph 50
50. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission in drawing up the EU Justice Scoreboard which aims at ensuring a high- quality justice system in the area of civil, commercial and administrative law since, at the end of the day, the concrete application of laws is in the hands of the courts; calls for the justice scoreboard exercise to assess all justice areas, including criminal justice and all horizontal issues; proposes that data regarding the state of the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights, and the fulfilment of European values (Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)) in all Member States be included as well within the competence of the European Union;