9 Amendments of Tadeusz ZWIEFKA related to 2013/2114(INI)
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas in the case of online music sales, licence-granting practices are being viewed as an alternativecomplementary to the system of private copying levies;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the private copying system is a virtuous system that balances the rightexception to copying for private use with the right to fair remuneration to rightholders, and that it is a system worth preserving, especially in cases when rightholders are not in a position to license directly the reproduction right on multiple devices;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends that, in the case of cross- border transactions, private copying levies be collected in the Member State in which the product is placed on the market and that the product then be allowed to circulate freely in the internal market without being subject to additional levifinal user resides;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses the need to make clear to consumers the role of the private copying system with regard to remuneration of artists and cultural dissemination; urges Member States and rightholders to replaceto complement their anti- piracy campaigns with ‘positive’ campaigns highlighting the benefits of private copying levies;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that private copying exemption arrangementscontractual arrangements between services providers and right holders are increasingly enabling the licensing of the reproduction right, enableing consumers to copy freelyaccess their musical and audio-visual material from one medium or type of multimedia material to another without the need to seek the authorisation of rightholders, provided that this is for private useseveral devices;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Observes that, despite permanent access to online works,In the view of downloading, storage and private copying for offline use is continuing; takes the view that a private copying levy system cannot therefore be replaced byremains complementary to a licencing system;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that, as for online services, contractual authorisations cannot be allowed to prevail to the detriment of private copying exception arrangementsupplemented by private copying levies;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27