BETA

10 Amendments of Luis Manuel CAPOULAS SANTOS related to 2008/0216(CNS)

Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) Powers should be conferred to the Commission to close a fishery when the quota of a Member State or a TAC itself is exhausted. The Commission should also be empowered to deduct quotas and refuse quota transfers or quota exchanges under certain conditions and on the basis of sufficient scientific grounds to ensure the achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy by the Member States.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording
1. Without prejudice to specific provisions contained in multiannual plans, and taking account of the type of fishery products, the distance between fishing areas, landing places and ports where such vessels are registered, the Commission may, in accordance with the procedure under Article 111, require masters of Community fishing vessels or their representatives shallto notify the competent authorities of the Member State whose port or landing facilities they wish to use at least 4 hours before the estimated time of arrival at the port, unless the competent authorities have given permission for an earlier entry, of the following information:
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. On the basis of the information under Article 26 or on its own initiative, where the Commission finds that fishing opportunities available to the Community or a Member State are deemed to be exhausted, it shall inform the Member States concerned thereof and shall prohibit fishing activities for the respective area, gear, stock, group of stocks or fleet involved in those specific fishing activities.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. If the prejudice suffered by the Member State for which fishing has been prohibited before its fishing opportunities were exhausted has not been removed, measures shall be adopted with the aim of remedying in an appropriate manner the prejudice caused, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 111. These measures may involve making deductions from the fishing opportunities, relating to the same species and in the same area, of any Member State which has overfished, the quantities so deducted to be allocated appropriately to the Member States whose fishing activities were halted before their fishing opportunities were exhausted.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. These deductions and the consequent allocations shall be made taking into account as a matter of priority the species and zones for which the fishing opportunities were fixed. They may be made during the year in which the prejudice occurred or in the succeeding year or years.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the case of multi-species fisheries, real-time closure shall be based on an assessment of the situation of the fish stocks of all species contained in the same fishing area.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 3
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may permit fresh fish to be weighed after transport from the place of landing provided that the fish could not have been weighed on landing and provided they are transported to a destination on the territory of the Member State that is no more than 20 kilometers from the place of landing, especially where weighing affects the quality of the fish, in particular where it is intended for processing.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1
1. Where a Member State does not respect its obligations for the implementation of a multiannual plan, and where the Commission has reasons to believe that the non respect of those obligations is particularly detrimental to the stock concerned, the Commission may, in accordance with the procedure under Article 111, provisionally close the fisheries affected by those shortcomings.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 97 – paragraph 3
3. If a Member State takes catches from a stock subject to a quota for which it has no quota, allocation or share of a stock or a group of stocks available to it, the Commission may deduct in the following year or years quotas for other stocks or groups of stocks available to that Member State in accordance with paragraph 1.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 99
The Commission may deny the transfer of quotas for stocks of a Member State to the following year in accordance with Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 of 6 May 1996 introducing additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs and quotas if: a) the quota to be transferred has been overfished by the Member State concerned in any one of the immediately preceding two years or b) the quota refers to a stock that is under a multiannual plan or is caught in association with a stock under a multiannual plan and there has been an overfishing of that quota or of quotas for stocks under a multiannual plan in association with which that stock is caught, by the fleet of that Member State in one of the immediately preceding five years or c) the Member State concerned does not take appropriate measures to ensure a proper management of the fishing opportunities of the stocks concerned, in particular by not operating a computerized validation system as referred to in Article 102 or by insufficiently operating the systems providing the data for this validation system.Article 99 deleted Refusal of quota transfers
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH