2 Amendments of Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI related to 2010/2294(INI)
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the Commission’s proposal of 2008 for amending Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 does not improve the Union’s transparency to the level required by the Lisbon Treaty but on the contrary that many of the amendments proposed by the Commission actually reduce the existing level; in particular, considers that the amendment which the Commission proposed to Article 3, which substantially restricts the definition of ‘document’ in comparison with the status quo, is contrary to the Lisbon Treaty; calls on the Commission to present a revised proposal for a revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 which would fully take into account the requirements for greater transparency enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, stated in the case-law of the Court of Justice and expressed in the concurrent votes by Parliament on amendments to the 2008 proposal in this and the previous parliamentary term; stresses that it is better to retain the current Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 than to adopt amendments which will water it down;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Considers that specially trained officer posts should be created and proper training of officials provided in each DG or corresponding unit of the institutions to create the best possible proactive policy as well as to, evaluate requests in the most efficient way and ensure that all deadlines laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 are properly adhered to;