BETA

Activities of Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI related to 2017/0309(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate) FI
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0309(COD)
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate) FI
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2017/0309(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism PDF (1 MB) DOC (182 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ENVI
Dossiers: 2017/0309(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(182 KB)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism
2016/11/22
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2017/0309(COD)
Documents: PDF(382 KB) DOC(147 KB)

Amendments (10)

Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines the need to find the most efficient and sustainable way of financing the additional priorities of the amended Union Civil Protection Mechanism; asks the Commission to provide clear and transparent reasoning for the selection of the budget lines proposed for redeployment; calls on the Commission to refrain from using redeployments from well implemented policy areas and from budget lines that have a high absorption rate.
2018/03/27
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 10
(10) In order to achieve the functioning of the rescEU capacity, additional financial appropriations should made available through redeployments from budget lines with poor implementation trends to finance actions under the Union Mechanism.
2018/03/27
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) Recent experience has shown that reliance on voluntary offers of mutual assistance, coordinated and facilitated by the Union Mechanism, does not always ensure that sufficient capacities are made available to address the basic needs of people affected by disasters in a satisfactory manner, nor that the environment and property are properly safeguarded. This is particularly so where Member States are simultaneously affected by recurrent disasters and collective capacity is insufficient. To overcome these insufficiencies and emerging hazards, all Union instruments should be made use of in a fully flexible manner, including the promotion of active participation of the civil society.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
(5) Prevention is of key importance for protection against disasters and requires further action. To that effect, Member States should share risk assessments, on their national safety and security risks, on a regular basis as well as summaries of their disaster risk management planning in order to ensure an integrated approach to disaster management, linking risk prevention, preparedness and response actions. In addition, the Commission should be able to require Member States to provide specific prevention and preparedness plans in relation to specific disasters, notably with a view to maximising overall Union support to disaster risk management. Administrative burden should be reduced and prevention policies strengthened, including by ensuring necessary links to other key Union policies and instruments, notably the European Structural and Investment Funds as listed in recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/201313 . _________________ 13 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 320).
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Prevention is about a culture of precaution before disasters strike. The Union Civil Protection Mechanism should encourage and help the Member States to plan prevention measures strategically and operationally. The Member states and their authorities work closest to the citizens. The national authorities are best prepared to design and implement the risk management plans. Ultimate responsibility on the deployment of the capacities should stay with the Member States.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) The most natural partners for deepening cooperation are neighbouring Member States who share the same expertise and structures and are most likely to be affected by the same disasters and risks.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 6 – point a
(a) develop risk assessments of safety and security risks at national or appropriate sub-national level and make them available to the Commission by 22 December 2018 and every three years thereafter;
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. As national prevention should be the first priority of Member States to reduce safety and security risks, the Union Civil Protection Pool shall be complementary to existing national capacities.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point c
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. Response capacities that Member States make available for the European Civil Protection Pool shall be available for response operations under the Union Mechanism following a request for assistance through the ERCC, unless Member States are faced with an exceptional situation substantially affecting the discharge of national tasks. The ultimate decision on their deployment shall be taken by the Member States which registered the response capacity concerned. When domestic emergencies, force majeure or, in exceptional cases, serious reasons prevent a Member State from making those response capacities available in a specific disaster, that Member State shall inform the Commission as soon as possible by referring to this Article.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 12 – paragraph 7
7. rescEU capacities shall be available for response operations under the Union Mechanism following a request for assistance through the ERCC. The decision on their deployment shall be taken by the Commission, which shall retain command and control of rescEU capacities. Particular attention shall be paid to ensure that the rescEU capacities shall not be used to replace Member States' own capacities and relevant responsibilities.
2018/04/12
Committee: ENVI