BETA

7 Amendments of Satu HASSI related to 2010/2021(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital C
C. whereas acts adopted under Article 290 and 291 of the TFEU may have important social, environmental, economic and health implications, and Article 290 ensures that, rather than being decided upon "behind closed doors", such acts are subject to a; whereas it is therefore of paramount importance, in particular with regard to delegated acts, that they are developed and decided upon in a fully transparent manner which effectively enables the co-legislators to control the exercise of the power delegated to the Commission, including by public debate in Parliament, where necessary,
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that sufficient time for a possible objection should be provided for in the basic act to enable Parliament to coordinate its internal positions and to take a sound decision, without unduly delaying the entry into force of uncontroversial delegated acts;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Therefore considers a minimum period for objection of two months, with a possibility of its being extended by a further two months on request by Parliament or the Council, to be the most appropriate solution, inasmuch as this allows for a relatively short period until entry into force for the large majority of uncontroversial delegated acts while granting Parliament or the Council sufficient time in which to exercise their rights of control in the case of controversial acts;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that so-called "early approvals" of the delegated acts are necessary only in precisely defined and exceptional casesConsiders that a formalisation of "early approvals" of delegated acts could lead to a situation in which early approvals become the rule; takes the view, however, that this would place a significant administrative burden on Parliament and the Council, given the substantial number of delegated acts; considers that a 2+2- month approach would instead provide comparable time gains without creating additional administrative burden, and could thus make such "early approvals" redundant;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that Parliament, by delegating certain powers to the Commission under Article 290, in no way abdicates its responsibility for any decisions taken pursuant thereto; considers therefore, in light of the potentially far-reaching nature of delegated acts, that Parliament should make available increased resources in all relevant entities so as to be able to discharge its responsibility for delegated acts;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Considers that Parliament, because of its continuing responsibility for decisions taken under Article 290, should ensure, in cooperation with the Commission, that Members of Parliament and their staff can easily access a digital information system that provides all relevant documents and up-to-date information on the process; considers that Parliament should furthermore ensure that the public has access to the documents and to information on the process as soon as the delegated acts are notified to Parliament, possibly through a system comparable to the Legislative Observatory;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Considers, in light of the individual nature of each delegated act, that it would be most appropriate for the rapporteur who worked on the basic act, if still a Member of Parliament, to assume special responsibility for effectively controlling the adoption of the delegated acts relating thereto;
2010/02/24
Committee: ENVI